Confirming that we both dislike Chacotaco atm.
Gord uh yeah you should read. We aren't going to be able to get a successful lynch today without you, and it would be smashing to have this as a perfect win. I'm fine with KuzEE in the even of SK. Traitor KuzEE is possible. But in any event they aren't a concern. I'd only consider lynching them in 3man lylo. My vote on them earlier was me just being salty.
Uh are you claiming vig then? I mean if you're assuming that there is a traitor/vig rather than sk, then you must be one of those roles. You being traitor is definitely possible seeing as you were the driving force for the Bardull lynch (extra info). Though I really hope you're vig instead.
BTW why does John fit perfectly with traitor? Was his input on Bardull/Soup weird in anyway? I did just think of something while typing this though, but I'd like to hear where you're getting your read from.
Oh yeah one last thing, why go for Auspher if not John if you have a town read on Aus? Why not Chaco or Mjay?
Reasoning on Chaco
We believe that Chaco is pretending to have skimmed. It's as if he is intentionally playing ignorance to give off the appearance of not having a clue about SK. He should definitely have this info for a few reasons:
1. He had seen both mafia flips.If anything he should realize that there isn't likely a third mafia. Why then come in looking for connections to Bardull (which what led to his Aus vote)?
2. He had the whole night phase to at least read a good portion of the game. Yet in his
#732 he implied that he hadn't even read anything in d1: "I got some reading to do to see what caused D1's 4 hour successful lynch".
Like really? Why would he be waiting until just now to actually read something. But that's not even the juice of it (hehe juice). What leads us to believe that he is faking this is his #739: "I'd have to dig, and I'm about to crash. Basically all it was, was a general isn't it to early to be considering safeclaims. PoE and that comment give me a placeholder til I read up and investigate it further."
Oh so it seems he has been reading some. What he would argue now is that he just read up to that point during the time he just came in. But this isn't so. We had been talking with him during that time. Look at the time difference between the posts from him entering and up to this post I just quoted. He wasn't reading during that time.
Ok now we have even more. Even if he was able to "skim" up to that, then why would he have to "dig it up"? He would know exactly where Aus posted that if not the general area. This whole "dig it up" post implies that Chaco read beforehand. Yet his #732 post is trying to give the appearance of not having read anything. Why n.n?
So yeah he faking ignorance/skimming. It's like he's going for the whole It's like he's trying to go for a "OH he must be town cuz he didn't realize the sk" ordeal.