The Light Music Club
Smash Master
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2013
- Messages
- 3,225
- Location
- Knoxville, MD/Elizabethtown, PA
- NNID
- _TLMC_
- 3DS FC
- 0576-6097-0725
Wait is Shantae 1st or 2nd party? I thought she was 3rd.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
She's third-party.Wait is Shantae 1st or 2nd party? I thought she was 3rd.
Well that's just going by leaks anyway.Source?
I agree completely. The DLC characters they add are going to be ones that are heavily requested. If they add less popular characters, not as many people are going to buy them.Which is just as well considering that they have never been among the most heavily requested Smash characters among the more dedicated Smash fans. Considering these are the people that DLC is aimed at, this does make the Chorus Men extremely unlikely as stand-alone DLC. If they make it in, I expect them to be part of a bigger DLC pack.
We have no way in knowing whether or not Gematsu's source was accurate past the first E3 list.Well that's just going by leaks anyway.
Unless of course, they are added as part of a pack along with heavily requested characters. Potential clone additions added as extras are one possible way, like, say, Pichu being part of a pack along with Mewtwo.I agree completely. The DLC characters they add are going to be ones that are heavily requested. If they add less popular characters, not as many people are going to buy them.
Do you want us to end up being wrong about many characters once again?Is there going to be another "Rate their chances" thread? I have to admit the character discussion board looks a bit naked without that thread at the top.
Yes. You can all give Isaac 0% chance and then I'll be laughing at you when he gets confirmed.Do you want us to end up being wrong about many characters once again?![]()
But it was so much fun being wrong!Do you want us to end up being wrong about many characters once again?![]()
Well the suspicious amount RH content comes to mind, I kinda feel that it's something that leads to Chorus Kids being planned, but yeah it's not fact yet, woops.We have no way in knowing whether or not Gematsu's source was accurate past the first E3 list.
Until we have legitimate evidence that supports the Chorus Kids being an intended part of the game, you can't claim they were as if it were fact.
Were going to wrong about a certain character's chances anyway. I recommend that kind of thread never happens.Is there going to be another "Rate their chances" thread? I have to admit the character discussion board looks a bit naked without that thread at the top.
Even though speculation is back, does anyone else feel like this forum is still somewhat subdued? I guess it's because a number of the bigger support threads are gone now by either being confirmed or deconfirmed. I suppose there also isn't the same boundless expectation either, no matter how many dlc characters we get the most recent one will probably be treated like the last one.
It was more fun when we knew there were at least 10 newcomers on the way.
The only suspicious aspect is that the series got Smash Run enemy like Ice Climber did, and we know for fact the Ice Climbers were supposed to return.Well the suspicious amount RH content comes to mind, I kinda feel that it's something that leads to Chorus Kids being planned, but yeah it's not fact yet, woops.
Imagine how speculation for DLC could hypothetically go like?But it was so much fun being wrong!
Why would they spend a long time working on someone who isn't going to sell as well as someone else? I mean, I'm not ruling it out, but it would seem pointless to me.By the way, Sakurai has never said only popular characters will be DLC, don't spread that as fact yet.
What about spending less development time on extra characters, namely clones, as part of a DLC pack where the main feature is indeed a heavily wanted character?Why would they spend a long time working on someone who isn't going to sell as well as someone else? I mean, I'm not ruling it out, but it would seem pointless to me.
That could work, but I don't see them spending time working on "Savvy Stylist" as a totally unique character that takes months to develop. I'm not saying it couldn't happen, but why would you spend a lot of time working on someone who people aren't as interested in? What you're suggesting is like the Mario Kart DLC pack where they added Link (someone cool) and yet another Mario and another Peach. So I wouldn't put that past them.What about spending less development time on extra characters, namely clones, as part of a DLC pack where the main feature is indeed a heavily wanted character?
Pac-Man already had an enemy through the Pooka. Yes, those debuted in Dig Dug, but they've become integrated into the Pac-Man franchise as well.There's a Xevious enemy in the game?
There's not much plausible enemies (Going by Sakurai's enemy criteria) in Pac-Man, theoretically, it's probably the reason why they chose enemies from other Namco games too.
Or, the more plausible explanation based on how Sakurai picked out the enemies, they were included for a specific purpose (small enemy protected by shield that is more of a hindrance than a threat) and because they had a model ready to use (ripped right out of Find Mii).As for the Find Mii enemy, they are probably just the general enemies for the many games Miis starred in, I personally think it doesn't count.
They still are in reference to playable characters.The only suspicious aspect is that the series got Smash Run enemy like Ice Climber did, and we know for fact the Ice Climbers were supposed to return.
But then there's the Xevious enemy and the Find Mii enemy (though that "series" got a stage).
Well, the thing is, here's how it works.I can see them doing like the Mario Kart DLC packs. Include a very popular character (Link) and add in one or two not-so-popular or easy to develop ones (Cat Peach and Tanooki Mario) all in one pack, with maybe a stage and a few other things too.
So yeah kinda like including Mewtwo and Pichu together with the return of Pokemon Stadium or Poke Floats as a "Melee Pokemon Pack" or something. Just an example.
I still say he tried to, but had severe problems getting Ridley to work on 3DS. Not sure what limitations would've caused it, but whatever the case, he couldn't get Ridley to work, and they put so much time into him they added him as a stage boss instead. That's probably the best explanation.If the "one popular and 1-2 obscure/clones in a pack" theory is correct, then I can see fan favorites like for example Isaac or Dixie easily get in. Strange that Sakurai chose not to include Ridley then.
If I could ask, what could said limitations be?I still say he tried to, but had severe problems getting Ridley to work on 3DS. Not sure what limitations would've caused it, but whatever the case, he couldn't get Ridley to work, and they put so much time into him they added him as a stage boss instead. That's probably the best explanation.
I'll give you three guesses...If I could ask, what could said limitations be?
3DS doesn't have enough power to handle certain situations. Ridley may have had some problems due to his body build. Another possible explanation could also be his wings. Even resized, his wings would still be quite large and could prove cumbersome on the smaller screen. On Wii U they wouldn't be a problem, but the 3DS might've been an issue. There's any number of things that could've gone wrong, as Ridley was always seen as a rather tricky character to get working. Sakurai even said so himself. Maybe he felt that Ridley was too slow, but if he tried speeding up Ridley's attacks, it caused extra lag on the 3DS.If I could ask, what could said limitations be?
Being "too big" could plausibly be an explanation, but not an explanation as to why he wouldn't be playable. Regardless of how Ridley would be resized, he'd still be one of if not the biggest playable characters. Slightly bigger than Bowser, likely. That is a plausible explanation for him not working on 3DS, but its a stupid argument entirely as to why any character would be skipped over (especially since Ridley's not that big in the Metroid games, in fact on average he's smaller than K. Rool).I'll give you three guesses...
Well, either they couldn't get the purple palette, time, or they needed Dark Pit to appease the war gods.I'll give you three guesses...
So what you're saying is they had issues due to size, he was "too big", so to speak.3DS doesn't have enough power to handle certain situations. Ridley may have had some problems due to his body build. Another possible explanation could also be his wings. Even resized, his wings would still be quite large and could prove cumbersome on the smaller screen. On Wii U they wouldn't be a problem, but the 3DS might've been an issue. There's any number of things that could've gone wrong, as Ridley was always seen as a rather tricky character to get working. Sakurai even said so himself. Maybe he felt that Ridley was too slow, but if he tried speeding up Ridley's attacks, it caused extra lag on the 3DS.
Pookas have appeared in the Pac-Man games as enemies.They still are in reference to playable characters.
Xevious enemy is supposed to parallel with Pac-Man along with Pooka, and the Find Mii Ghost is supposed to parallel with the Mii Fighters.
Yes it can.The Sneaky Spirit just snuck it's way in, the fact that Rhythm Heaven has an extra two trophies with them (with the Chorus Kids being among them) can't be a mere coincidence.
Is Rool so popular oustide Smash community too? Sakurai must think about other people than the extreme fans, like the usual casual group who also buys the game. How well known is Rool among those people?I still say if they go by popularity (and importance honestly), K. Rool is in a much better position than Dixie. Dixie is the most popular playable DK character, but K. Rool is far more wanted as a whole in Smash Bros. Honestly I say we should get both, but there's no guarantee that kind of thing would happen.
Now prepare for "King K Rool is too big"Ridley's not that big in the Metroid games, in fact on average he's smaller than K. Rool).
Well knowing how many oddballs we've gotten. I still think they're likely.So if unpopular or obscure characters are unlikely as DLC, is it pointless to support Mach Rider?
I dont think so, why should there be?Is it just me, or does anyone else think there's gonna be limitations for DLC characters such as only being playable in Versus Mode?
I suppose that's a fair point, but it's still Namco like Pac-Man and Pooka. Pooka isn't even marked as part of the Pac-Man franchise, despite having a lot of relations to it. I doubt we'd get the Bacura and Pooka if we didn't have Pac-Man too. So it's not like they're completely unrelated.Pookas have appeared in the Pac-Man games as enemies.
Bacura have not. The only connection is through Namco as a whole with nods and references to other games they made within games they make. So as I said to BluePikmin, it's less because Pac-Man and more because Namco.
The last bullet point still suggests that Miis are a reason too. Miis are playable.And as I also said to BluePikmin, there's more reason to believe that the Yellow Ghosts were included because of ease of inclusion and their specific function as opposed to "because Miis are playable" based on what Sakurai said about how he picked out the enemies.
– serves well as a general enemy
– light processing of movement on 3DS (comes down to the system’s hardware)
– it is possible to create uniqueness for that enemy
– maintaining balance between big or small, weak or strong enemies
– reduction of the relative workload that is required
– comes from a series that is possible to choose
More than one difference.Yes it can.
Monster Manor has two trophies. Warrior's Way has two trophies. Mii Force has two trophies. Rusty's Real Deal Baseball has two trophies.
The only difference is that Rhythm Heaven also features an enemy with its own trophy.
Pretty muchHaven't been on this thread since it reopened. What's going on, just random DLC lists?
i was just thinking it would be too much work for All Star Mode, and it's no use playing Classic Mode with them since you already got there trophies from who knows where in the game.I dont think so, why should there be?
I dont think that no use for Classic mode is a reason for not having them playable there. People may like them and want to take on Classic mode challenges with them anyways, even thought you do not get their trophy.Pretty much
i was just thinking it would be too much work for All Star Mode, and it's no use playing Classic Mode with them since you already got there trophies from who knows where in the game.
I generally agree, although I would say make it more open to the smaller franchises. Characters like Isaac, Mallo, Andy/Sami, Chibi Robo, Ray etc. Sometimes it feel like they're the real impossible ones.....the ones caught in limbo between likely and unlikely.I personally want Sakurai to use the same criteria he used for the main roster, only it's more open to third-parties and Nintendo characters that were considered impossible (like Masked Man and Geno).