- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 38,998
- Location
- Um....Lost?
- NNID
- Swampasaur
- 3DS FC
- 4141-2776-0914
- Switch FC
- SW-6476-1588-8392
I dunno. I'd rather have Zero for a second Mega Man character.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Wrong time thoughI dunno. I'd rather have Zero for a second Mega Man character.
Idea for a Pokémon Newcomer I saw from Gamefaqs:
....Though unlike PT, he'd fight directly while being able to summon Torkoal, Golurk, or Sigilyph to assist in some attacks.
And unlike the idea on Gamefaqs, Floette would be part of a victory pose.
Unorthodox, but I kind of like it.
Still Mega Man all the same.Wrong time though
X with Zero
Classic with one of those 4
Wouldn't make sense to have classic and ZeroStill Mega Man all the same.
Proto Man dah bess.I dunno. I'd rather have Zero for a second Mega Man character.
Doesn't make sense to have Zero and Tron Bonne.Wouldn't make sense to have classic and Zero
Well I would rather not see it like that in Smash.Doesn't make sense to have Zero and Tron Bonne.
Doesn't make sense to have Zero and Roll.
Capcom made it work.
Yeah, but honestly, I don't get a "sword heavy" vibe from any of the potential newcomers, unless it's specifically someone from Soulcalibur or Lloyd Irving.Still Mega Man all the same.
Intriguing but wierd. And I'd rather my sweet Greninja as playable.
Also my idea for a new pokemon newcomer.
[/spoiler]View attachment 8014You probably saw this coming golden
Welp, it was mostly the GameFAQs people, and they never seem to be short on bad ideas.I may not be too keen on the idea of shoehorning Dixie onto Diddy, but anyone who thinks Diddy/Dixie would be like Ice Climbers is a fool.
I think it could be fun and unique.Welp, it was mostly the GameFAQs people, and they never seem to be short on bad ideas.
And again, just separate them. While Diddy and Dixie are fairly similar, they could still function to be great characters separately.
Putting them together is like if you forcibly married random GameFAQs Smash 4 boards posting members; It just ends ugly no matter which way you slice it.
Better idea; don't pair them up....Welp, it was mostly the GameFAQs people, and they never seem to be short on bad ideas.
And again, just separate them. While Diddy and Dixie are fairly similar, they could still function to be great characters separately.
Putting them together is like if you forcibly married random GameFAQs Smash 4 boards posting members; It just ends ugly no matter which way you slice it.
Keep Diddy by himself and have Dixie pair up with Kiddy.Better idea; don't pair them up....
and add Cranky Kong separate instead of Dixie! (of course, K. Rool too)
Dixie with TinyKeep Diddy by himself and have Dixie pair up with Kiddy.
I know he's "irrelevant" these days, but it's the only other pairing that makes sense.
Diddy stays the way he is, and we still get Sakurai's idea of the pair-up mechanic. Everyone wins.
And yeah, K.Rool as a newcomer, too. I think he should get top priority over Dixie and others.
-----
Looks like Ridley has some competition. Who is the bigger one??Idea for a Pokémon Newcomer I saw from Gamefaqs:
....Though unlike PT, he'd fight directly while being able to summon Torkoal, Golurk, or Sigilyph to assist in some attacks.
And unlike the idea on Gamefaqs, Floette would be part of a victory pose.
Unorthodox, but I kind of like it.
YESH.Intriguing but wierd. And I'd rather my sweet Greninja as playable.
Also my idea for a new pokemon newcomer.
Doesn't mean we can't deconfirm Tom Nook, there's still the possibility of a second AC character, but it's a pretty minor one, but they are not dead.Tom Nook isn't requested because we know have an Animal Crossing character. He was requested because Sakurai rejected the idea of the Villager.
With Villager now confirmed, his chances are dead.
I actually had the team concept for Dixie and Kiddy kongI think it could be fun and unique.
DKC tag style where they can interact, throw, etc. eachother and switch for different attacks
My speculation has always been that Diddy and Dixie, when they were planned to be paired, were a sort of hybrid between Ice Climbers and a transforming character - one character would follow behind you but there'd be something like a Down Special to switch between the two characters on screen, emulating the original Donkey Kong Country formula.I may not be too keen on the idea of shoehorning Dixie onto Diddy, but anyone who thinks Diddy/Dixie would be like Ice Climbers is a fool.
Funky Kong?To me it just wouldn't make any sense to pair Diddy and Dixie up Ice Climbers Style this time around, especially when Diddy was a fleshed out independent character the first time around, he would lose a lot of balance if Sakurai decided to change course and go with his original plan now for the duo. If we do get a new DK rep I would want it to be King K Rool, though I would be fine with seeing if there any new characters worth mentioning from Tropical Freeze as well.
That would be out of left field, but hey I wouldn't mind Funky Kong joining in, would be interesting at leastFunky Kong?
Final Smash Gamer said:Another questions for the much deeper fans that regularly watch this thread :
Do you think Fire Emblem is worthy to have 4 slots or is it too soon yet ?
For me, the ideal would be :
- Marth, the original Lord and "poster-guy" of the franchise.
- Ike, the most original Lord (is a Ranger at first), is considered as the face of the international releasing of Fire Emblem, uses a 2-handed sword, Ragnell, and is the 2nd most recurrent Lord.
- Chrom/Lucina, "poster-guys" of the most popular title of the franchise, would also represent the Dual Support system.
- Robin, the other and true hero of Awakening, would represent the second most-important class of Fire Emblem (the Tactician), would be the 'Krystal' of Fire Emblem in terms of gameplay potential.
I think this is the ideal, but also would be a bit too much.
I think Classic Megaman and Bass would work out the best. Bass has more going for him to be a unique character.Wrong time though
X with Zero
Classic with one of those 4
Can't agree more, and considering that Bass is the main rival to Megaman in most of the classic games, as well as a secret boss it would serve well if Megaman was to get two reps.I think Classic Megaman and Bass would work out the best. Bass has more going for him to be a unique character.
Splashwoman and Sheepman. or Dustman and Springman.Cut Man and Guts Man tag team
I think Fire Emblem should get 3 characters at most. 4 is pushing it a little too far.So as this thread is re-opened, I'll repost my question I've also put on the Fire emblem thread in order to see new opinions on it :
This. Fire Emblem is growing, but it's not huge. Hell, if it weren't for Awakening, it would be DOA. Four reps are generally reserved for huge franchises (Mario, Zelda, Pokemon), with Mario sometimes breaking that threshold for being the biggest.I think Fire Emblem should get 3 characters at most. 4 is pushing it a little too far.
Fire Emblem isn't a significant enough Nintendo franchise to warrant 4 characters.So as this thread is re-opened, I'll repost my question I've also put on the Fire emblem thread in order to see new opinions on it :
I would prefer that as well, but honestly, Dixie as a late addition like Wolf-status clone (which is basically like similar proportions and weights and very few borrowed moves) wouldn't be a bad move either.Better idea; don't pair them up....
and add Cranky Kong separate instead of Dixie! (of course, K. Rool too)
That would actually make a lot of sense. They are different, but have similar properties, and don't really "hold each other back" from being unique, because they are essentially unique in the same avenues. Still, again, it would be easier to separate them in terms of time, effort, and money.Dixie with Tiny
I don't care about how big a franchise is, I care about how many quality potentially playable characters it could have.Fire Emblem isn't a significant enough Nintendo franchise to warrant 4 characters.
Heck, 3 characters is pushing it, the reason that I think it will happen is because Awakening was such a big game.
DK and Kirby would be next in line for 4 reps, Fire Emblem would be down the road somewhere.
Out of curiosity, who are you thinking in terms of unique Fire Emblem reps?Fire Emblem and Donkey Kong (Country) could easily have 6 great and unique playable characters, and, to me, that's all that matters. After all, we play as characters, not franchises or "reps".