Shun Goku Satsu Rake
Oriwa Rake. Kaizo ko ni oriwa naru
- Joined
- May 8, 2012
- Messages
- 3,897
So JD am i scum now that your caught up ?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I just had to get this out while I'm looking backMy case is made up of just about all your posts this phase; you've literally asked only pointless questions and made pointless contributions (aka fluff) without making an active attempt at scum hunting. Even now, your play caters to a defensive and passive approach that doesn't support Town. It's only when I poke you that you attempt to poke back, but you're not trying to take the initiative at any time otherwise.
Someone making a case for JokerTown would be someone showing Town where your Town intent lays and explains your thought process/approach to the game. So far, I haven't seen pro-town intent from anything you've done, really. If I have, it was small and minuscule in comparison to most of the cast.
Your reads (particularly on me) are ridiculously inconsistent and incoherent. I go from being scummy to being "cleared" to mediocre/null/whatever. Which is it and why? The rest of your play is incoherent as well. You play completely different when being pressured than when others are the focus and while you tend to post fairly strong opinions, they're frequently useless and/or not followed up and are frequently changing.Seriously though: I remember when I was getting yelled by Bardull and Kantrip about having suspicion of Riddle early D2 I was just wondering "What? Why do they have him as town enough to lynch me over it, did I miss something?" but then I just assumed I hadn't been reading hard enough and let it go.
Now I'm wondering if they didn't just choose him as their token town read. It's easy enough as scum to just go "Ok X is town" and be certain of it. Riddle might have given us his greatest contribution by simply existing and being mediocre and never proving his town outwardly lol.
I'm doubting it, you've even bothered to stick around after your hammer and ask questions like that which I doubt would serve a huge purpose as scum.So JD am i scum now that your caught up ?
It's not too hard to follow. I came in curious of you, Bardull and Kantrip threw a fit to the point of starting a wagon on me: I assumed I must have been derping it hard if you were that clear and turned my opinion on it's head. Now it's apparent they haven't had a good reason for that in the first place so I've gone back to where I used to be.Your reads (particularly on me) are ridiculously inconsistent and incoherent. I go from being scummy to being "cleared" to mediocre/null/whatever. Which is it and why? The rest of your play is incoherent as well. You play completely different when being pressured than when others are the focus and while you tend to post fairly strong opinions, they're frequently useless and/or not followed up and are frequently changing.
Would be okay with a JD lynch tomorrow.
Not sure why BarDulL thinks I'm so damn townie, would like elaboration on that as well.
Wtf, I've been asking for a mass claim today and nobody did crap.Mass claim tomarrow btw.
Nearly everyone is already claimed Vinyl.Wtf, I've been asking for a mass claim today and nobody did crap.
Trufax lol, I know I did in the past.You're forgetting that Rake is a gigantic troll, and he'd totally be willing to hang around and trollolololol even after getting caught, just for the fun of it.
You literally used the word "cleared" regarding me after an entire reread and the only basis of it was circumstantial evidence based on two uncleared players? This fear of having controversial opinions is extremely scummy.It's not too hard to follow. I came in curious of you, Bardull and Kantrip threw a fit to the point of starting a wagon on me: I assumed I must have been derping it hard if you were that clear and turned my opinion on it's head. Now it's apparent they haven't had a good reason for that in the first place so I've gone back to where I used to be.
Nope, but apparently I was right about youlol looks like joker read the end of utrik'd
Lackluster contribution, Not Scum HuntingVinyl can wait.
Vote: Riddle
I don't see the Town incentive behind your most recent post. Your contribution seems lackluster in that it doesn't serve any real purpose other than take up space. Why aren't you scum hunting?
Lackluster ContributionFluff, lackluster contribution. Don't like his earlier questions and seems like he's trying to come off as though he's actually contributing.
Reactionary playstyleDisagree here, didn't feel that you had much of an impact in painting him as dumbTown, probably because you weren't assertive that Tako wasn't scum (played him off as dumb, but of what alignment?) You're also entirely reactionary in your style of play and usually post only when someone says something about your slot (i.e. right now), you're 99% defensive, which is probably why I didn't feel that you put much of an effort to act as Tako's saving grace until scum vs. dumb debate turned to ad nauseum. Oddly, I remember you trying to counter JD's posts, but you were entirely passive about it. I have to reread it.
See Bolded.My case is made up of just about all your posts this phase; you've literally asked only pointless questions and made pointless contributions (aka fluff) without making an active attempt at scum hunting. Even now, your play caters to a defensive and passive approach that doesn't support Town. It's only when I poke you that you attempt to poke back, but you're not trying to take the initiative at any time otherwise.
Someone making a case for JokerTown would be someone showing Town where your Town intent lays and explains your thought process/approach to the game. So far, I haven't seen pro-town intent from anything you've done, really. If I have, it was small and minuscule in comparison to most of the cast.
I am about to show you all of Riddle’s posts up until this point. If a post has one of the things Bardull didn’t like, I will point it out.BSP - BSP has been playing mostly sidelines and hasn't gotten himself into the meat of the business yet. Sitting in the same boat as 194, except he's up a slight notch. Would also like to see him show off his observational skill and out who he thinks should be the one to go.
Riddle - Town lean. Love his questions and his reads, his thought process also matches my own. Didn't like his first post of the game, but he's thoroughly improved throughout the day phase and I'm pretty comfortable with him.
Lets gooooo
(confirming)
@BarDull I used to be a DGames regular about a year and half ago. I'd say I've played in around 15 games and I have 0 clue what my record is.
lacking in contribution, non scum-huntingChatterbox sounds like an awful restriction/role. It's also pretty difficult to determine whether someone is a chatterbox at this point any because tons of people have that posting style.
lacking in contribution, reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingI was simply agreeing with you and Rake that Rake's posting style is not particularly indicative of any restriction, since that was practically the only topic of the Day. Adding to discussions, even if the input isn't new, helps town to see where people stand on issues and isn't anti-town in any way. Perhaps I'm just used to more inane conversation early on in Day 1.
Why are you so calm about potentially being shot? Do you believe that BarDulL has a gun? If so, how serious do you think he is about likely shooting you?
reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingI hate this explanation, but it's a really risky one for scum to use, so I'm inclined to believe it. Still, what made you think that ending RVS quickly by getting a wagon started on yourself was better for town than just letting RVS end in its own time?
His claim seems weird; I can't figure out the motivation behind it for the life of me. Other than that, I like he way he thinks. He certainly has a very different style from me, but he seems to be actively scumhunting and playing with town's best interests at heart.
What (useful) information could you possibly be hoping to gather from the answer to this question?
lacking in contribution, reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingI wasn't sure if your question was asked in order to feel Kantrip out (as it seems to have been) or if there was a more specific reason for the query.
So, what were you hop-
lacking in contribution, reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingAssuming tako is telling the truth about his role, what does this accomplish?
reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingThat doesn't make any sense. What reason would scum have to counter claim? They can just wait and then both masons are outed. Tako should breadcrumb some sort of code that is undecipherable and then tell his partner about it, so his partner can reveal the breadcrumb and clear himself at any point later in the game if/when Tako flips mason.
non scum-huntingI read the same wiki and it clearly said that masons are occasionally mafia/town, although the official name is neighbors, so it seems fairly likely that your partner is town. Definitely ask John2k4 though.
Don't answer this tako.
This information is more useful for the mafia than it is for town if Tako really is a town mason, as there is only a fairly small group of people who could be construed as having defended him. A mafia mason would almost definitely defend his partner at least to some degree, because a town mason flip could pretty easily clear him in the minds of the town. This post is either scum-motivated or poorly thought out, I'm not sure which.
lacking in contribution, reactionary playstyle, and non scum-hunting@Mod: To what extent does this rule prevent nearly impossible to discover breadcrumbing. Can you clarify it?
reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingInactivity, maybe. Regardless, I see absolutely no reason for tako to answer the question you asked him, it's clearly anti-town to lessen the pool of potential mason partners for scum when a breadcrumb would work so much better.
lacking in contribution, reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingI read the rules as well, but I feel like there has to be some way to breadcrumb in a way that only the mason partner can reveal later on. It's kind of a vague rule. I'm not sure where the boundary between codes and legal breadcrumbs is.
non scum-huntingThe term "gambit" has become too vague for me to understand the previous post you made about gambiting Kantrip. Could you please clarify the method and purpose of said gambit?
lacking in contribution, reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingPlease don't answer questions specifically directed to other players. In this case it's mostly harmless, but it's certainly preferable to just allow the person questioned to respond in nearly every imaginable situation.
reactionary playstyle@BarDulL - Fair enough. Did you believe that you gained anything useful from this "gambit"?
reactionary playstyleWhat makes distancing yourself from a player that is confirmed town to you a good idea in any way? It just doesn't make any sense to me. There's absolutely no reason to do so.
reactionary playstyle, and non scum-hunting (still going after the mason claim btw)So you're saying that if it looked like tako were going to be lynched, you weren't planning on claiming to save him? You were just going to let him die and hope that scum didn't pull out a mason connection out of thin air?
Outright wrong on Joker not defending Tako btw.There's a lot of play going on that doesn't make any sense to me at all. I can't come up with a reason for towntako OR scumtako to make the RVS play he did, and, similarly, I can't figure out why Joker wouldn't defend Tako at all. I think they're both probably town, but really only because of their claims. I just need to get in both of their heads more to figure out what they could possibly be thinking.
Not scum hunting, reactionary playstyleThe tako stuff has dominated the day, but I have Kantrip as a town lean too. Scum can just be sitting back and not doing anything to call much attention to themselves in light of this conflict, and I'm sure that's what they're doing, so my guess is that mafia is composed of people like Red Ryu/194/BSP/Vinyl./etc.
I think town's best play is to pretty quickly figure out what we're going to do about tako/Joker and then if we decide not to lynch them, we should move on. If they're telling the truth and are both town masons, than this extreme focus on them is just making it too easy for scum to coast.
Lackluster contribution, reactionary playstyleWhat are you even talking about?
Riddle’s reads outed:Riddle - Town lean. Love his questions and his reads, his thought process also matches my own. Didn't like his first post of the game, but he's thoroughly improved throughout the day phase and I'm pretty comfortable with him.
There's a lot of play going on that doesn't make any sense to me at all. I can't come up with a reason for towntako OR scumtako to make the RVS play he did, and, similarly, I can't figure out why Joker wouldn't defend Tako at all. I think they're both probably town, but really only because of their claims. I just need to get in both of their heads more to figure out what they could possibly be thinking.
So Bardull, you liked his reads even though 2 of them were on confirmed townies, and 1 was a town read. Riddle did not make a SINGLE ATTEMPT to pursue someone on his own. You specifically questioned people for :The tako stuff has dominated the day, but I have Kantrip as a town lean too. Scum can just be sitting back and not doing anything to call much attention to themselves in light of this conflict, and I'm sure that's what they're doing, so my guess is that mafia is composed of people like Red Ryu/194/BSP/Vinyl./etc.
I think town's best play is to pretty quickly figure out what we're going to do about tako/Joker and then if we decide not to lynch them, we should move on. If they're telling the truth and are both town masons, than this extreme focus on them is just making it too easy for scum to coast.
Lackluster contribution, Not Scum HuntingVinyl can wait.
Vote: Riddle
I don't see the Town incentive behind your most recent post. Your contribution seems lackluster in that it doesn't serve any real purpose other than take up space. Why aren't you scum hunting?
Lackluster Contribution againFluff, lackluster contribution. Don't like his earlier questions and seems like he's trying to come off as though he's actually contributing.
Reactionary playstyleDisagree here, didn't feel that you had much of an impact in painting him as dumbTown, probably because you weren't assertive that Tako wasn't scum (played him off as dumb, but of what alignment?) You're also entirely reactionary in your style of play and usually post only when someone says something about your slot (i.e. right now), you're 99% defensive, which is probably why I didn't feel that you put much of an effort to act as Tako's saving grace until scum vs. dumb debate turned to ad nauseum. Oddly, I remember you trying to counter JD's posts, but you were entirely passive about it. I have to reread it.
Lackluster contributionHere's an example. What were you trying to achieve with this? How are you progressing the game forward by posting this as a response? Are you just trolling, or was this an actual response to my assertion of JokerScum?
See Bolded.My case is made up of just about all your posts this phase; you've literally asked only pointless questions and made pointless contributions (aka fluff) without making an active attempt at scum hunting. Even now, your play caters to a defensive and passive approach that doesn't support Town. It's only when I poke you that you attempt to poke back, but you're not trying to take the initiative at any time otherwise.
Someone making a case for JokerTown would be someone showing Town where your Town intent lays and explains your thought process/approach to the game. So far, I haven't seen pro-town intent from anything you've done, really. If I have, it was small and minuscule in comparison to most of the cast.
But you're still fine with Riddle? He’s outed ONE read at this point outside of the confirmed townies.I said "still think he's scum" in more of a "you think he's scum even after the masonry claim?" as a response to your "I'm positive some of you aren't reading w.r.t. Joker" post. Assumed it was an insinuation that you felt Joker was scum, otherwise I have no clue where you were going with it. Would really like your reads regardless, still don't see any meat on your bones.
See Joker, I want to point out to you that you weren't (and still shouldn't be) sure about Riddle either. The strong townRiddle is baseless.I guess I can give you some of the ones that require less digging
I wanna reread Riddle and BSP before outing a read. I'll tell you that at this moment you seems seem likely town, but I don't remember much of your posts up until more recently. Ryu I think I'm Null on, but I wanna reread him too. Kinda getting a headache looking at the screen right now so it might wait until tomorrow. I promise to finish though
pssh. You avoid suspicion for all of D1 with this vig gambit, and then not shoot.Kay, read up.
Not shooting. Deal with it.
Riddle has outed 1 read. Why are you trying to get the cop off of him, and why do you trust him so much?**** outta hear with Kantrip/Riddle, Rake/JD for cop targets.
Now, I want everyone to see this. Here are Riddle’s posts since Bardull’s last read on him:BSP is not a bad choice.
Riddle is Town. Kantrip is fine and is not a threat, he's a pro-town slot and doesn't need to be investigated. Rake is pro-town but I have my paranoia with him all the damn time :[. Really though, BSP/JD is probably the best course of action.
What are you even talking about?
Note: Riddle still hasn’t made any pushes of his own.Vote: Vinyl.
I'm not liking either Vinyl or 194 right now. A lot of fluff, almost no useful information, and they both seem quite opportunistic as far as their reads go. I'd like to see a lot more content from both of them, and less complaints about how "out of it" they are.
Vinyl's discussion of BSP in particular doesn't sit particularly well with me, which is why I chose to vote him, but I would be fine with lynching either of them. They'd make good vigilante targets too (*cough*BarDulL*cough*).
I feel like almost everything I've seen from you has been interactions regarding your masonry. Reads on a bunch of other players would be awesome.
Nothing usefulWe have a couple more days for discussion, but barring anything completely unexpected, I'm down with this course of action.
Here are MY reads. Up to this point, anything Riddle has done to warrant not being copped, I’ve done the same. Remember, as far as providing ONE read outside of confirmed townies (Kantrip town lean), Riddle has made no pushes.I would be more worried about this if I didn't think you really do have a shot right now.
I think Rake is town. I can't see any malicious intent from his play so far. It got the masons outed unfortunately, but he's genuinely hunting for information, which is a good thing.
I'm leaning town on Bardull. I don't think he'd parade around mentioning this gun he has unless he didn't really have one, and he has given us some thoughts so far. I want to see you use this shot though.
I believe Joker's Mason claim. I read through all of his explanations and I can see where he was coming from. So I think he's town.
By extention, I think Tako is town too.
Toaster needs to get in this game. I don't want his slot coasting into D2, so I wouldn't mind if he gets shot.
I want to see Ryu add more, or he can go toDay. I believe Kantrip pointed out that pretty much the one thing he did that was important recently was suggest that the other Mason be outed.
I want 194 to answer all the questions addressed to him or he can go too.
I don't really know what to think of Vinyl, but he's pretty much mentioned me and hopes of me being scum in this game in a lot of posts. There has to be some reason for this. I don't think he's a top priority right now, but he needs to be looked into.
Riddle seems fine so far.
Kantrip seems fine so far too.
Nothing substantial yet againI don't need a full list, but if that's the only time you give out town reads, then yeah do that.
Still no pushes, and still no contentYou are correct. You will have a hard time finding any accurate meta on me until I flip in Hunter x Hunter.
I don't want to wait until the deadline or anything like that, but I would certainly like to wait until people like Red Ryu/Toaster give us content/reads before going into Night.
I feel like almost everything I've seen from you has been interactions regarding your masonry. Reads on a bunch of other players would be awesome.
NothingWith BarDulL, Rake, Joker, BSP, and Kantrip already voting 194 and 7 needed to lynch, I believe 194 is actually at L-2.
Still nothing original194's whole catch-up post was pretty terrible, but this in particular irritates me to end. Too-townie/too pro-town isn't a scumtell and it never will be, this really just strikes me as an OMGUS by pressured scum on a player that has played a very pro-town game. I'm going to switch my vote to 194 as soon as I make sure that it's not a hammer.
194 should claim.
NothingUnvote, Vote: 194
That's L-1
NothingI appreciate the caution, but you're over-thinking it. I just want to leave my vote on 194 before I go to sleep and I trust that town won't hammer until all of the loose ends are tied up.
Here’s his vote on 194. Notice the COMPLETE lack of a case. Bardull was the FIRST one on this wagon.Vo te: 194
If you've been reading this post, you know this is a blatant contradiction when Riddle is his biggest town read.194 - Don't like this slot and would be ok seeing it go. Has been mostly playing around in the shadows with some sideline commentary here and there. Don't see a lot of meat.
Riddle - Town lean. Love his questions and his reads, his thought process also matches my own. Didn't like his first post of the game, but he's thoroughly improved throughout the day phase and I'm pretty comfortable with him.
Ok, I’m scum for not scum hunting or pushing anyone. I’ve also sheeped every wagon I’ve been on. Bold parts on the Riddle read are flat out wrong and are never backed up.BSP - nullscum. literally does nothing all game. nothing. only reacts to people when they push for his slot, never pushes for anyone or does real scum hunting otherwise. was pushing against my slot d1/d2 because of my vig claim, wtf, he didn't have a scum read on me and he was pushing for my claim on what grounds? none. like seriously, this was pretty dumb if he's town, and more damning if he's scum. also i'm pretty sure he has sheeped every wagon hes been on, i don't remember him spearheading any wagon or doing anything in particular that made me think he was genuine.
Riddle - strong town lean, i wish kantrip wasn't the indy, he's the only one who sees the ballerness that is riddle. riddle has lacked obvious presence in d3, but riddle's d1/d2 play is fine. he asks all the right questions, pushes all the right people, and while he comes off as kinda passive, he's actively scumhunting. i can bring up several posts of his where he does this, and i probably will, because no one gets his play. zzz.
No Push, No Reads, SidelinesVinyl's claim was so strange. An end of the Day 1 doc claim just doesn't make any sense to me. It strikes me as more of a gambit than an actual claim, and it does make a lot of sense as a gambit for a vanilla townie to make. Essentially, if scum believes you then you save whomever you want (in this case Bardull) in return for your own life, and if Bardull is telling the truth about his role, that's awesome for town. An actual doc could just stay quiet and save Bardull and I don't see any reason for Vinyl not to do that as doc.
What complicates the matters is the lack of a death. There are a couple of possibilities. As you said RRscum is a very distinct possibility and makes a lot of sense. However, a doc save is entirely possible as well. Either Vinyl or a possible unclaimed doc (assuming Vinyl was gambitting) could have successfully saved the nkill target (Bardull or maybe Vinyl if scum believed Vinyl?).
Sorry if this is all a mess. I just have a lot of hypothetical scenarios going through my head right now,
No Push, No Reads, Sidelinesye s I do
No PushThe only four people I'd consider lynching at this exact moment are JDietz, Orboknown, BSP, and Rake.
JDietz - Hasn't done much of anything has far as providing new or useful information to town. His argument with Joker was strange and his focus on the mason claims doesn't make any sense to me as a pro-town move beyond getting some extra information, and that does not feel like what JD's goal was.
Orboknown - I'd rather this slot be shot, but if Orboknown starts contributing and anything he says strikes me as even remotely anti-town, I'd lynch him in a heartbeat. Toaster skated through all of Day 1 with absolutely no useful input, and I have no reason at all to see him as a townie at this point. Hopefully Orb is able to change my opinion.
BSP - All of BSP's reads feel very safe and pro-status quo. Based on his meta (i've read MLP and we were both in HxH) this isn't unlike his town play, but it's also highly reminiscent of the kind of caution that mafia often uses when "scumhunting."
Rake - Rake gives me a little bit of a bad vibe, but nothing major. He seems to be trying to look like an active and contributing player, while providing very few original reads. Some meta would be appreciated on Rake, but he just strikes me as a little off. Definitely a low priority for now though.
No Push, No Reads, SidelinesWhy is this? What do you think about Vinyl's doc claim?
How ironic. Anyway, No Push, No Reads, SidelinesI would also like to know what prompted that post, and I'm glad you feel the same way. Given Bardull's almost religious opposition to fluff posts (see my first post Day 1), the post seemed out of character.
I refuse to lynch JDietz before Orboknown catches up and gives us some information.
No Push, No Reads, SidelinesOr anyone else, obviously.
No Push, No Reads, SidelinesI NEED something more concrete than this. Give me a more certain opinion regarding Bardull or at LEAST clarify who you think the better targets for today are.
No Push, No Reads, SidelinesJDietz needs to claim at the very least before we lynch him. I would also prefer content from either Orbo or Rake, but it's not absolutely necessary.
Other than that, I'm good.
I agree.Agreeing with other people is a lot easier/safer than making your own reads.
Which posts?
No Push, No Reads, SidelinesI am Cleon [Human].
My internet connection is really spotty right now, so expect less frequent posts. I'll try my best to keep caught up.
No Push, No Reads, SidelinesMy internet problems have yet to be fixed, and they're getting worse, so V/LA until I can figure them out.
Safe vote, nothing original.Vote: Orboknown
I don't see anything stopping us from lynching Orboknown immediately. He's clearly the play for today and there's no reason to discuss the infinitely many possibilities, since we can just wait for the flip and discuss then with the possibilities likely drastically narrowed.
I still like BarDulL and Kantrip quite a bit and want them to remain alive as long as possible. The only thing that would make me suspect either of them is Kantrip's jailer claim. Is it just me or do indy Abductor and town Jailer have some pretty major overlap in terms of night actions? Having both them in the same game seems like a strange set-up.
Safe, nothing originalYou're the person I want to lynch the most out of the three that were partially incriminated by Vinyl's (almost definitely) legitimate claim.
No Push, No Reads, SidelinesWould jailer night actions go before abductor night actions?
No Push, No Reads, SidelinesOkay that makes a lot more sense to me then.
Up to D1, you literally made 1 stance , and all of your stances for D2 were very safe without substantial evidence either.I can't make a super long post right now, because I have a piano lesson in like 10 minutes, but I'm all caught up and I might be able to elaborate a little on my reads/hopes for today later tonight.
I'd just like to note that I've taken clear stances on people, and there's a difference between passive play and simply not aggressive play. If you reread all of my posts you'll see some pretty clear reads, questions, etc. BSP is literally admittng to playing passively, though.
Everything you’ve said in this post applies to you too.You literally used the word "cleared" regarding me after an entire reread and the only basis of it was circumstantial evidence based on two uncleared players? This fear of having controversial opinions is extremely scummy.
I've yet to see a legitimate, original read from you the entire game. All of the focus on the passiveness of BSP/me and nobody's said anything about JD's completely useless play? For shame.
When asked, Bardull never made this case for his townRiddle read. It’s such a strong town read though, IDK what the problem is.Someone making a case for JokerTown would be someone showing Town where your Town intent lays and explains your thought process/approach to the game. So far, I haven't seen pro-town intent from anything you've done, really. If I have, it was small and minuscule in comparison to most of the cast.
Nope, I’m not buying this. You never made a legit case on 194.Pretty sure I spear headed it, I was the first one on 194, lol.
Just telling both of you guys that with one mafia dead in the animal group, there's literally no chance in hell that there's a second mafia. Indy's pretty much dead by this point no matter what if he's fakeclaiming animal.
What made you consider him being scum?I've considered BarDulL scum. I've considered it a whole bunch.
Show me why.And every time I've considered it, I've come to the conclusion that he's town.
I honestly don't know what you're trying to say with this last part. I didn't mention anything about Bardull in regards to you (correct me if I'm wrong).You should keep in mind that all the stuff that BarDulL didn't like about me, did NOT mean I was scum. It turned out I was town, and therefore any of those behaviors present in Riddle's play are also not strongly indicative of scum.
I'll think about it, again, but I don't think BarDulL is gonna be a good play.
It's not reaching, there are legitimate holes in his read on Riddle.Sounds like reaching.
A reactionary playstyle isn't entirely an indicator of alignment. I call people out on their style of play to get a feel for them, but typically I don't immediately jump to conclusions with a slot in question if it's 90% reactionary. Joker's slot is a prime example of this behavior; Joker was initially fairly reactionary in his approach to the game, however it wasn't a telltale indicator of scum alignment. Some people are just like that. However, I don't feel that you share the same case. At all. You've been playing reactionary all game while coasting, sheeping, not scum hunting, and never putting forth your own cases, which essentially puts you in the anti-town/scum section immediately. As a result, you have no clear, clean connections to draw from any other player, and thus you're a detriment.Disclaimer: this might be repetitive in some places, but im trying to prove a point.
To begin, let’s establish what Bardull DOESN’T like when he’s looking at slots:
Lackluster contribution, Not Scum Hunting
Lackluster Contribution
Reactionary playstyle
See Bolded.
Alright, so what Bardull doesn’t like in a nutshell. He questions posts lacking in contribution, reactionary playstyles, and non scum-hunting. He also EXPLICITLY states how someone is supposed to defend a town read. Keep this in mind, it comes later.
Your analysis of Riddle's play is mostly deplorable. Your responses in blue, my responses to Riddle's play in red, my response to your critique in green.Now let’s look at where he gives his read on Riddle and on myself:
Lets gooooo
(confirming)
@BarDull I used to be a DGames regular about a year and half ago. I'd say I've played in around 15 games and I have 0 clue what my record is.
lacking in contribution, non scum-huntingChatterbox sounds like an awful restriction/role. It's also pretty difficult to determine whether someone is a chatterbox at this point any because tons of people have that posting style.
lacking in contribution, reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingI was simply agreeing with you and Rake that Rake's posting style is not particularly indicative of any restriction, since that was practically the only topic of the Day. Adding to discussions, even if the input isn't new, helps town to see where people stand on issues and isn't anti-town in any way. Perhaps I'm just used to more inane conversation early on in Day 1.
Why are you so calm about potentially being shot? Do you believe that BarDulL has a gun? If so, how serious do you think he is about likely shooting you?
reactionary playstyle, and non scum-huntingI hate this explanation, but it's a really risky one for scum to use, so I'm inclined to believe it. Still, what made you think that ending RVS quickly by getting a wagon started on yourself was better for town than just letting RVS end in its own time?
His claim seems weird; I can't figure out the motivation behind it for the life of me. Other than that, I like he way he thinks. He certainly has a very different style from me, but he seems to be actively scumhunting and playing with town's best interests at heart.
What (useful) information could you possibly be hoping to gather from the answer to this question?
@Mod: Request punish for this post breaking rule 1