Bowser and the Suicide Clause

[Mr. Escalator]

I'm sorry for your loss, Zigsta
---
On the topic of Sudden Death and the % lead rule, I was playing the new Tournament Mode (1v1 For Glory rules) and it seems that time-out is decided by who has dealt more damage in the match. 'Sudden Death Off' is a rule you can implement in Tournament Mode - If it does indeed decide based on who dealt the most percent damage in the match (results screen will have it), then maybe we have precedence for a rule change to reflect that.

Percentage Dealt > Percentage Lead due to Nintendo's wishes? I'll have to test if that's truly how it decides in that game mode, but I think it handles it like that.

 

[S_B]

So I'm going to leave it there for you to comment on and your final words on the challenge will show your motives and determine where we go from here.

You already heard my final words:

Hell, you could be right and people might be okay with it, but you won't know until you try...

You won't know until you try. My thought is that people aren't going to be at all receptive to the idea of letting SD play out, but posing the question here is meaningless because hardly anyoen is even reading this thread any longer.

Make a case on the actual forum suggesting that SD will be played out and see what happens. The worst case scenario is that people disagree and explain why. *shrug*

 

[T0MMY]

Make a case on the actual forum suggesting that SD will be played out and see what happens. The worst case scenario is that people disagree and explain why. *shrug*

Like I said I am not interested in just pushing the idea that SD should be played out, that puts people off right away (it put me off too. What I'd be willing to do is write a thread showing its competitive viability and say it is actually a reasonable option that could be used if ever there comes a time that the community thought about using it as an option.
Personally, I'd rather support the use of a 1-stock Rematch clause first and get people away from using the %-based ruling (which we both seem to agree is atrocious).

 

[S_B]

Like I said I am not interested in just pushing the idea that SD should be played out, that puts people off right away (it put me off too. What I'd be willing to do is write a thread showing its competitive viability and say it is actually a reasonable option that could be used if ever there comes a time that the community thought about using it as an option.
Personally, I'd rather support the use of a 1-stock Rematch clause first and get people away from using the %-based ruling (which we both seem to agree is atrocious).

Sure, give it a try, then.