#HBC | Gorf
toastin walrus since 4/20 maaaan
Good shiz RonEEke. It's not gonna go anywhere toDay, but I'm definitely gonna keep an eye on Tan.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
1] He's solely gone after weak and inactives, generally switching once his target becomes active. He's tried to defend this a few times, so he's obviously aware of it.
Now, I gotta say I believe you RonEEke.I would love to keep my vote on roneeke after his ridiculous post against me. However, we're running out of time and I don't think I can get enough support to form a good lynch against him. I had really hoped to lynch either Jungle or Ron to help prove a theory, but I guess there is always tomorrow.
In the meantime, Cheesecake was an original target for me, so I have no problems moving my vote back to him.
UNVOTE VOTE: eXpiRed_CheEezCaKe
Whoa whoa whoa. Why is it that you don't think you can form a good lynch on him? Because there's nothing there? I don't see why you want to lynch people to 'prove a theory' as opposed to lynching people to 'help win the game.'I would love to keep my vote on roneeke after his ridiculous post against me. However, we're running out of time and I don't think I can get enough support to form a good lynch against him. I had really hoped to lynch either Jungle or Ron to help prove a theory, but I guess there is always tomorrow.
In the meantime, Cheesecake was an original target for me, so I have no problems moving my vote back to him.
UNVOTE VOTE: eXpiRed_CheEezCaKe
Journal Entry, September 22nd, 9:25 a.m.I don't find the case particularly convincing and I'm wondering why nobody questions it in the slightest. Blatant wagon hopping on day 1 is part of the reason why it's so hard to get information from what happened back then and I think it's a mistake to make the same play toDay. Ronike's case doesn't apply exclusively to Tandora - I found similar flaws in SC's play [inb4OMGUS] to name an example and complaining about activity police is textbook scum play in EE's case.
Tandora's read on cheesecake lines up with mine [although I'd rather have jungle lynched], which is reason enough for me to find her somewhat useful - more so than COUNTLESS other people and I'm still getting more pro-town vibes [including her activity police play] from her than the majority of players.
Jungle can die. Cheesecake can die. OK with Chibo dead. These are the three people I'll join a lynch for if needed. Not OK with the Tandora lynch - I'll be keeping an eye on people who dump votes on her without putting too much thought behind it. Easy opportunity for expired scumcake and other scumbags to gain credibility by not joining immediately. Townies should reconsider.
![]()
Hey guys wanna see my Tandy impression?Tando said:I would love to keep my vote on roneeke after his ridiculous post against me. However, we're running out of time and I don't think I can get enough support to form a good lynch against him. I had really hoped to lynch either Jungle or Ron to help prove a theory, but I guess there is always tomorrow.
In the meantime, Cheesecake is someone I went after at some point and who has been under fire from other people, so I'm going to move my vote back to him, as I know my actions are going to be under scrutiny from here.Tando said:In the meantime, Cheesecake was an original target for me, so I have no problems moving my vote back to him.
I wasn't aware that more than one person couldn't be guilty of the same thing. What's your point? Are you saying Soviet Coffee is more guilty of it? Are you saying Soviet Coffee is more scummy for it? Are you saying it's null, yet putting an accusatory tone toward Soviet Coffee?Gheb said:I found similar flaws in SC's play [inb4OMGUS] to name an example and complaining about activity police is textbook scum play in EE's case.
Oh, right.us said:So, for those who didn't heed my plea of please don't tl;dr, here's a summation of scumdora:
[lots of words and us being sexy millionaires like always]
So, I like tandora as a play today. Nix's "ooh, ooh, lynch me!" is just dumb. Vote: Tandora
Targeting him for doing exactly what you were doing to me, hmmm.I don't find the case particularly convincing and I'm wondering why nobody questions it in the slightest. Blatant wagon hopping on day 1 is part of the reason why it's so hard to get information from what happened back then and I think it's a mistake to make the same play toDay. Ronike's case doesn't apply exclusively to Tandora - I found similar flaws in SC's play [inb4OMGUS] to name an example and complaining about activity police is textbook scum play in EE's case.
Tandora's read on cheesecake lines up with mine [although I'd rather have jungle lynched], which is reason enough for me to find her somewhat useful - more so than COUNTLESS other people and I'm still getting more pro-town vibes [including her activity police play] from her than the majority of players.
Jungle can die. Cheesecake can die. OK with Chibo dead. These are the three people I'll join a lynch for if needed. Not OK with the Tandora lynch - I'll be keeping an eye on people who dump votes on her without putting too much thought behind it. Easy opportunity for expired scumcake and other scumbags to gain credibility by not joining immediately. Townies should reconsider.
![]()
Just to be clear, it is completely baseless lol. Like if youre thinking theres some underlying thing going on... there isn'tJournal Entry, September 22nd, 2:20 p.m.
I've liked Soviet Coffee's statements toDay. Fine with Jungle as backup lynch.
Still think Tandora should die if she doesn't give a complete defense toDay, including answering every single question she's brought upon herself. This type of behavior will be nipped into the bud.
Still want Nix to survive toDay based on Dr. Riddler's completely baseless defense of Nix.
Out of Ron's whole post, this line bugged me the most. I read it as I am being too town to be town, which is what sparked my ridiculous statement.The target? Why, it's seemingly white knight Tandora!
This is wrong. You mean that cheesecake is weak and inactive? Swords was inactive when I started my case against him? Have I gone after Nix?So, for those who didn't heed my plea of please don't tl;dr, here's a summation of scumdora:
1] He's solely gone after weak and inactives, generally switching once his target becomes active. He's tried to defend this a few times, so he's obviously aware of it.
Why does this make you uncomfortable? It's not like the whole game the only thing I have done is parrot others with "Me too" statements. I have made posts and when doing a reread saw that we had made similar posts.2] Keeps saying others are thinking the same as him, makes me uncomfortable
Like calling a female him? And then randomly remembering and switching to the female pronoun? Because you did that throughout your attack against me after I said in a post I am female. Everyone makes mistakes. I don't think I've made any major ones that require to get me lynched.3] Keeps misreading and making little mistakes, which I'm not too fond of
Praxis DID NOT like Cheese. I made a typo which Dr Riddler asked about and I clarified.4] MAJOR contradiction at day two start.
It's that whole voting against you, isn't it?5] Just doesn't rub me well at all...
What? I don't see this as a valid reason to vote or not vote for someone.No...I'm saying that if I vote for Tandora for the arguments that RonEEke posted which can also somewhat be applied to me I would be saying I'm also scum -_- but since I am not scum it would seem hypocritical of me to vote Tandora for those reasons -_-