Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
ok. it seemed very weird that you would laugh at a joke macman made about my meta when ive only ever played with you in one game for one day. especially when that joke was about something he said in another game of mine you werent in... now that i think about it, i also need to figure out what game that was in and see if macman was even in that game. but your laughing at it piqued my interest.Oh, and @Tom -
I thought Macman's post was funny because he suggested that people ignore 40% of what someone posted to keep from getting mindgamed. That's similar to what someone said about me in a game that I'm playing on AiB atm where I am scum and have the town down to 2 scum vs. 3 town and all but one think that I'm innocent.
kevin already knew about my new strategy - i brought it up in a game in the LoD that we are both in right now. so, no.His reasoning on why he might view things from your perspective makes sense, it's just since he made it public it would be easier for you (if you were scum) to manipulate him.
you give three reads that i cant tell if they are null-reads or not, and you dont vote, and then after those three null-reads you say you have nothing else. i pointed this out earlier, but this post sucks.Nix is getting the rest of his make-up work done from having a week off of classes due to a giant snowstorm and working on a Presentation on Robotics that's due tomorrow before having a three-day weekend.
Was gonna post tomorrow after my classes, but that would put me past the 2 day deadline. So, here we go!
Fever - You guys know his play style more then me and there doesn't seem to be "too" much of a problem with what he is doing (and to be honest, his play style seems very similar to mine usually) but his little conversation with Tom makes me feel a bit weird as I know from Sleepover me and Marshy did a few of those to throw of suspicion.
Omni - Yes, I am suspicious of you only for the reason is that you are trying to get us out of RVS (and you did it fast), and it would be a epic mafia play to actually do that to receive less suspicion later on in the game. Take no offense though, as I usually suspect all the people that take charge for the same reason.
Steel - Your current postings seem all to similar to Sleepover =P Avoiding the questions and not really giving a answer and considering I was your scum buddy in that game.....yea >_>
Don't really get anything else sticking out at me so *Shrug*
im supposed to know that how? and i dont know why, even if you HAVE told him before, why he wouldnt use that knowledge to his benefit if he were scumkevin already knew about my new strategy - i brought it up in a game in the LoD that we are both in right now. so, no.
What is a null-read? This is the first game i've really seen that word so I'm not entirely sure of its meaning.you give three reads that i cant tell if they are null-reads or not, and you dont vote, and then after those three null-reads you say you have nothing else. i pointed this out earlier, but this post sucks.
you also need to compound on what you said about bunglefever's conversation with me. basically you just cast suspicion in a weak manner on four different players without voting. stop beating around the bush plz.
Which would be why I was asking for clarification.@ryker: your "summary" post blows chunks son. no, im not voting who you say i am. plus, it doesnt seem at all like macman wants nix to take a bullet, it seemed like macman was trying to coax more out of nix before making a decision on his alignment. your post seemed like an oversimplification of every issue that was wrong about almost all of them. i dunno what this means about your alignment but it kinda seems like you *are* paying attention but you also are getting the wrong things out of each issue.
No bull.if it was legit you'd have support. not everyone ignoring you. try agian.
Discrediting the player instead of responding to the actual accusation? Just tell us who your scumbuddies are and die already.i'm also tempted to say dumb or scum, but there are two of you. i guess two heads aren't always better than one
How much more can you ask for?Chac_01, you bring up an interesting point, but is that all you got?
Hey Scumni, call me when your done nudging the stronger players while selectively going after the weaker players. You're voting Blue Yoshi because he's an easy target. You think Ronike is scum but fail to adress anything specific amd you don't vote him.Ronike you are so scummy this game
that's the reaction i was waiting for.Omni you are so scummy in this game
Oh wait, I don't say anything, so it don't mean nothing... Ready to put your money where your mouth is yet?
1.) extremely weak argument is weak. i know its been a while but i've never known you to latch onto weak arguments like thisHeh, I know you've been lurking for a while, but even you should know Omni's not one to act like that when told someones gonna be inactive for a few days+ right when starting the game. And you know full well that my "bad logic" cases work quite often. Worked quite well on you in BIM and BSM, works on Marshy often, and just works for me. Whats wrong, trying to discredit me before I get you and your whole team lynched?
1.a) continuation of weak argument. you get called out by myself and a few others while getting a bit of support from Steel. i then begin to grill Steel and i become rude towards Gheb/ChacoBut Omni, I'm not joking about you clearing him to lurk. Strep thoat is not something to give you a reason to lurk, in fact times when Ive had strep throat Ive become more active, so I think Ryker's bull (not about being sick, but about how he doesn't need to post) and I think its weird that you are being uncharacteristically nice about it.
2.) dont understand how "typical Omni" has not been typical this entire game. mind clarifying? the ronike i know and love HATES when Omni gets a big head and/or plays egotistically i.e. ignoring Chaco/Gheb. so you feeling better about me rather than scolding me like usual is interesting. also, i agree with Tom that Steel could either be the obvious play or the easy play so you moving onto Steel's wagon AND suggesting bungle seems like a really safe commitment to makeHmm... Well Omni's back to being typical Omni, which makes me feel better, and Ryker isn't lurking like he said he was going to (scared since he got called out?) which I suppose is a bit of a null tell... Right now I guess I'd feel comfy cozy with steel as our lynch target, bungle's startin to look nice too though... Hmm...
Chac_01, you bring up an interesting point, but is that all you got?
i.e. repeat everything Omni already saidThe buddying of me and flippy flopping and posts 172 - 179, where you basically just dodge omni's questions while trying to look like you aren't.
3.) you were silent for a while up until Ryker asked what a null-tell was. this is where my meta comes in.Ryker, I thought this would be painfully obvious by now, but nobody on swf does a vote spread. Its all vote counts.
Nix: a null-tell is a tell that doesn't really tell you much, it could be done by either a scum or town. A null read then is basically that you aren't getting anything off them, town or scum.
your name wasnt in the who's online in dgames, it was just me, cello, and magmarthWill join if you can answer me this:
Did my name appear next to it Tom? I've had it open on a tab all day long, but haven't been on my comp. I'm not sure how it reads you as actively viewing.
that is exactly what i want, and if you dont do it then i will shoot youAlso, if you're expecting the happy-go-lucky everywhere me that's in Miller, it's not going to happen. That takes more energy to keep up than I thought it would, and I don't think I could do it in two games. Besides, it's not as effective as I thought it would be anyway.
Wha? Am I the only one not quite following the logic here?I don't like that Omni tried to simply chop out Hobo's feet from under him. How is saying "There is support for your cause, therefore you can't get support for your cause", credible in any way? Still, it's something I think Omni would say, so I don't think it's scummy, but I do think Omni should go into some real detail about why Hobo is wrong. Consider this Hobo's first bit of support on the subject.