PsychoJosh
Banned via Administration
No. I said Microsoft could MAKE the game, I didn't say it would be a "Microsoft All-Star Fighting game", I very clearly said "Rare all-star game" in that same post you quoted. Never once did I combine the words "Microsoft all-star game", that's something you pulled out of nowhere. You can't even pull the predictable "you implied such and such" argument because I quite clearly said "Rare all-star game" in that same post you quoted, making you 100% in the wrong here.You said, and I quote:
This is where you made this idea of yours analogous to Smash Bros. and being a "Microsoft All-Star game". If that's not what you meant, then disregard this and just treat my points as my "thoughts" on this idea. As for your point about Power Stone, seems like you're the one who's either not read your post or didn't think them out that well because your only comparisons to Power Stone you've made in this thread were purely gameplay related and not conceptual.
Of course my comparisons to Power Stone are gameplay related, that's the ONLY relevant criteria as to whether or not a game is "like" another game. Did you understand it as me saying it should have a STORY like Power Stone? Or saying it should have the same art style? I don't know why you'd think I was talking about anything other than gameplay. I think if there were an Olympics for mental gymnastics you'd be a gold medalist.
Again, irrelevant. Rare is now owned by Microsoft, period. Therefore any game of this caliber will inevitably be Xbox One/Windows PC exclusive. The fact that their old franchises appeared on other systems is of nobody's concern. That's like saying Sega can't do an all-star racing game with their IP because they were all previously exclusive to Sega's consoles.And you didn't get my point about association. This isn't about whether characters have games or not or how long they've had games, etc. it's not that black and white. It's just that when you hear Joanna Dark, Sabreman, Mr. Pants, etc. you don't think Microsoft or Xbox, no you think about the ones on Nintendo system because those were the ones that stood out in the franchise. Duck Hunt, ROB, etc. while they haven't had a game per se, are associated heavily with Nintendo, and are "retro" which is their own special connection to Nintendo. And they are still relevant to Nintendo because they are iconic to the company's image.
(Also Mr. Game & Watch has the recent Game & Watch Gallery games and Fox has a new Starfox game coming out so there's that).
multipleNo, "multiple" means more than one whereas numerous gives the idea of having a significant, or large number of something. Or at least that's what it's supposed to mean in this context. If you still disagree, then fine, that's what I meant to convey despite my choice of words, let's leave it at that.
[muhl-tuh-puh l]
adjective
consisting of, having, or involving several or many individuals, parts, elements, relations, etc.; manifold.
numerous
[noo-mer-uh s, nyoo-]
adjective
consisting of or comprising a great number of units or individuals:
I think you need to learn what words mean.