A journey from lock to lock !

[Z1GMA]

First: I know this is kinda stupid.
Second: It's not a garanteed lock.

Start as Shiek, juggle the opponent from 0% to about 50% using Ftilt.
Switch to Zelda (stupid ,I know) lock opponent with Dtilt and keep kickin util he/she has about 70%, now Fsmash or Usmash.. opponent should have about 85% now!

Once again, this idea is pretty stupid and it's easy to mess up. Plus it's possible for your opponent to DI out of it..

Still I think it's a pretty cool thought!

 

[Natural High]

If only Transform was like it used to be in Melee then I might consider this idea possible.

But since there's so much "lag" in that move your opponent isn't going to just sit there and wait for you to lock them a second time.

What I'm trying to say is that strategy leaves you too open to be practical. But I do understand what you're trying to do here. We're all looking for that "Perfect Tandem"

 

[SinkingHigher]

Hellooo.

That's like saying get a tilt lock with sheik, run off the stage and die, then come back and tilt lock again.

Two different locks my friend.

 

[Z1GMA]

We're all looking for that "Perfect Tandem"

Hellooo.

That's like saying get a tilt lock with sheik, run off the stage and die, then come back and tilt lock again.

Two different locks my friend.

Two different locks that locks on different %'s ! :nerd:

 

[wazgood]

Neutral B lock on springs. Discuss.

 

[ShengNu]

yeah i agree i think the lag is too great to even consider it :/

 

[Z1GMA]

yeah i agree i think the lag is too great to even consider it :/

The lag between switching from Shiek to Zelda?

lol, I didn't mean you should switch right next to your opponent and then
continue with the lock as if the opponent wouldn't get out while you transformed for about 2 or 3 seconds..

My point is that Shieks lock is effective from 0% to around 55% were it gets quite uneffective cause of opponents DI.
And Zeldas lock becomes effective at around 55% and uneffective at around 75%.

Yeah I know! this thread is stupid!

 

[Tezmata]

Yeah I know! this thread is stupid!

And yet you posted it anyway...

 

[Z1GMA]

And yet you posted it anyway...

Read before replying, please..
The idea of (switching) i s VERY stupid...
But the fact that Shieks lock% ends where Zeldas lock% starts is pretty intresting imo.

Shall I make it even more clear maybe?

 

[SinkingHigher]

lol if this is your idea of clear...

I think you need to refurbish your post. Call it: "Sheik's lock ends where Zelda's begins".

The main post should simply say... "Discuss"

Because honestly, there's nothing else to say that's not useless or obvious.

 

[Z1GMA]

"Sheik's lock ends where Zelda's begins"

That doesn't sound as epic!

The main post should simply say... "Discuss"

"Discuss" sounds so demanding!

 

[Tezmata]

Shall I make it even more clear maybe?

Maybe you should make it more clear why you posted a thread that you openly admitted was stupid. I'm not even sure how anyone could misinterpret the meaning behind a sentence as simple as "This thread is stupid."

 

[Z1GMA]

Maybe you should make it more clear why you posted a thread that you openly admitted was stupid. I'm not even sure how anyone could misinterpret the meaning behind a sentence as simple as "This thread is stupid."

I opened the thread cause i thought it was pretty cool that Shieks lock
*bla bla bla* > Zeldas lock! *bla bla bla*

BUT! at the same time it's stupid cause you rarely get time to swith when your opponent is at 55% damage =_=