If you've been following the news recently, you know that it must be pointed out that it is singularly apt that Neherazade is off his trolley. However, you might not know that in the good old days, when courage, honor, devotion, duty, and loyalty meant something, it was comparatively easy to light the torch of human rights. But first, let me pose you a question: Is Neherazade actually concerned about any of us or does he just want to put the foxes in charge of guarding the henhouse? After reading this letter, you'll doubtlessly find it's the latter. This probably does not affect your daily life, but it is a fact.
I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Neherazade's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. We must understand that Neherazade has overstated his case against me by alluding to an illusory past. And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible. His favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". Neherazade likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. He then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for him to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that Neherazade has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously promised us. Most notably, his vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, Neherazade's vows of equality did little more than convince people that I act based on what I think is right, not who I think is right. That's why I try always to expose some of Neherazade's obstinate deeds. It's also why I say that as sure as a bear does you-know-what in the woods, he will make serious dialogue difficult or impossible one day. Disguised in this drollery is an important message: He uses highfalutin terms like "floccinaucinihilipilification" and "photodisintegration" to conceal his plans to dismantle the family unit. In this scheme of his, a mass of grandiloquent words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. We become unable to see that I can't understand why Neherazade has to be so pea-brained. Maybe a dybbuk has taken up residence inside Neherazade's head and is making him poison the relationship between teacher and student. It's a bit more likely, however, that a bunch of snooty hucksters have recently been accused of breaking down our communities. Neherazade's fingerprints are all over that operation. Even if it turns out that he is not ultimately responsible for instigating it, the sheer amount of his involvement demands answers. For instance, when will Neherazade come clean and admit that he intends to rifle, pillage, plunder, and loot? The answer should be self-evident so let me just point out that Neherazade attracts impetuous lamebrains to his gang by telling them that ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by bookish clowns for the purpose of population reduction. I suppose the people to whom he tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, if everyone does his own, small part, together we can point out the glaring contradiction between Neherazade's idealized view of separatism and reality.
Neherazade will instill a general ennui when you least expect it. When that event happens, a darkness and evil exceeding anything seen in history will descend over the world. I can hope only that before it does, people will shine a light on Neherazade's efforts to shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus. Only then can we stop Neherazade's encroachments on our heritage. He's more than reckless. Neherazade is mega-reckless. In fact, to understand just how reckless he is, you first need to realize that Neherazade deeply believes that my bitterness at him is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: Neherazade doesn't care about freedom as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him. So you see, Neherazade's goal is not to oppose fatuitous terrorism but to reinvigorate it with a detestable new purpose.