That argument isn't valid because:
1.) Pro-banners are biased too. Especially ROB, Marth and Peach players (from my experience).
2.) Many anti-ban voters from the SBR don't play/main MK (Dazwa, Samurai Panda, Afro_Thundah, Ankoku, Atomsk, Nope, etc)
3.) Pro-banners are more inclined to vote for invalid reasons such as diversity
4.) Some MK players from the SBR voted pro-ban (TKD, Lee Martin, Overswarm)
5.) Many anti-ban voters deserve to be in the SBR more than some pro-banners (ADHD > Praxis, Candy > Xyro, Neo > Overswarm, MikeHaze > almost everyone lol)
It's not rigged. Anti-ban won fair and square. If only MK players voted anti-ban and all of them did so then it shouldn't count. But many MK player voted pro-ban and many no MK players voted anti-ban.
The only reason why MK not being banned was predictable is because that's the way it should be. Just look at all the good players, who voted no and aren't in the SBR: ADHD, Meep, Neo, Candy, hunger, Fatal ... the list goes on and on.
There was no bias in the vote.
![059 :059: :059:]()