I just saw the movie. I dont really feel like talking about 9/11.
(and I have no interest in banking)
Let's see.
The movie said something about the Bible copying it's repetition of 12 from the 12 stars/constalations or something like that. The Bible was written about 1000 B.C. The Babalonians were the ones who created the twelve star thingies. They did it about 500 B.C. So saying the Jews copied is out of the question by a good 500 years.
December 25th. I actually never knew about this, and concede this is probably where we got Jesus' supposed birthday from. But the Bible never mentions a birth date whatsoever so, once again, the New Testament didn't copy that from other myths. What probably happened was that some people later noticed the similarites from the myths and asigned that date as his birthday.
The similarities between Horus the Egyptian god and Jesus aren't as strong as the movie would have you believe, and a quick scan through the internet would prove this. Though both were supposedly born of virgins, Horus did not have twelve followers, was not betrayed, did not die for anyone (though he did die and was brought back to life), did not rise after
three days after his death, had no baptism, blah blah. The virgin mother thing was the only similarity I could find with a quick search. Look into any of the gods Jesus is supposed to have been copied from, and it's quite obvious the similarities are greatly exaggerated.
Edit: Oops! Horus didn't die at all. It was Osirus, his father(?) who died and was reborn, but not three days later, mind you.
Oh, and the gospels New Testament was mostly written a good ten years or so after Jesus' death. The Jews were one of the most devout people when it came to their religion. Example: Jewish children, every single one of them, would memorize the first five books of the Bible (even though at that time it wasn't seperated into books and chapters like we have today) at an early age. Though I dont remember, it was definitely before ten, and they would since then memorize the rest of the scriptures by the time they became teenagers. The best of the best of the best were chosen to become Pharisees and everyone else, despite having memorized all of the writings of the Old Testament, would go off and become regular citizens. Farmers, fishermen, blah. So the point that "there is no written evidence of Jesus from Roman scholars" may or may not be true (I didn't look), but judging by the type of people the Jews were, I doubt they could have been so easily fooled like that. Any blashphemy on such an obvious level would have been squashed.
And boooooo at the conspiracy theories. Boooooo.