Unless you were joking or trolling (It would be in very poor taste to joke about this considering how people on these boards are) I find this insulting.
Whoah there cowboy!
@
ミスティック Speed
has a point whether you want to admit it or not! I personally find it ****ing sad that
some of us can't be bothered to drop Melee for good after 13 years. Yes it is the game that put Smash Bros on the competitive scene, but clinging onto it and hissing at any new smash bros game that comes along even when you have top developers from Tekken/Soul Caliber working on the game's competitive edge is just childish! That's right,
CHILDISH! Think if the Street Fighter community for example were quick to throw IV in the dumpster before even properly testing the game upon release and go back to II, Alpha, or III rather than wisely choosing to first develop its competitive meta as best as possible before reaching a verdict on IV's place in the tournament scene. This what if scenario I just described is unfortunately true as its the best description for the general "MELEE IS BETTER SCREW ANY OTHER SMASH GAMES AFTER IT" attitude that plagued the smash community for years after Brawl's release and while it was somewhat justifiable why the Melee crowd threw a temper tantrum over it back then, its not justifiable to throw one to 3DS/Wii U as *gasp* it has the best of both Melee and Brawl packed in to appease both crowds for the most part and furthermore not everyone has a copy of the 3DS version yet.
You are putting negative connotations on people for both liking a game and wanting to play a game that is like that game. Wanting a successor to Melee is not selfish it is simply wanting to get the most out of loving a game. If people prefer Smash to be like Melee that desire is no more selfish than liking that the game isn't like Melee. Are you selfish for liking Smash 4 the way it is? No. Than it isn't selfish to prefer it to be different either.
While its not wrong for people to want a successor to Melee, A. We already got that it's called Project M. B. What
is selfish is bashing on a new game just because it doesn't have exploits/glitches which are both a physical challenge to pull off consistently and more or less alienate new players looking to get into the tournament scene. Brawl was one thing, but 4 is looking to be the competitive game we should have gotten six years ago with Brawl complete with tricks/advanced moves that won't give you hand problems over time and are easy to reasonably tough to pull off while retaining the welcoming new player atmosphere Brawl had. That is all but a bad thing
It is people like you that drive people to stick to one little area of the boards and not come to discuss other areas. Maybe if people weren't so hostile toward Melee players, then they might find something to like about other games.
Ad hominem attacks like that even if subtle to most don't help your argument much and if I recall correctly, some of Melee's fanbase did the exact same stuff you complain about it in your post during the Brawl era. Ask any Mod/Staff Memberfrom 2008 onward. Ask them how many flame wars they had to snuff out back then. Ask them about the chaos the boards suffered back then the first few months Brawl was out in stores everywhere. If anything, some Melee players/fans are the problem not the solution and I feel the entire debacle over Melee VS Brawl only got worse when Project M got big and acquired its own fanbase both new and old. As I've said before, they are not wrong for wanting a worthy successor to Melee, they are only in the wrong for bashing unfairly on a new game that's the best of both worlds and making snide comments like "Welp back to Project M" just because their veteran main is different even in cases where it is
for the better such as Bowser (and yes I have seen the occasional Melee/PM user whine about Bowser in 4 sadly enough.
) doesn't help their case if at all.
It is early sure, but impressions of 4 are almost strongly positive and many have gushed on and on about how its the perfect blend of Melee and Brawl or how much better the cast feels as a whole compared to Brawl's infamous problem with MetaKnight for starters. You don't have to move on if you really don't want you though don't expect 4 to go anywhere anytime soon if you do. Quite a few competitive players have been playing the 3DS version and most like what they see and are willing to pick the game up competitively speaking and once the Wii U version is out complete with the GameCube controller adapter (C-Sticking anyone?), it's expected by many that 4 will go where only Brawl could have dreamed about for most of its competitive run (making the game TOO casual is what happened to killed it in the end along with PM)
Anywhom tl;dr:
While it is a bit of an exaggeration to say that all of the competitive community wants nothing less than a Melee 2.0, the vocal minority annoyingly enough tends to act like they are the mouthpiece for the smash bros community when the reality of the situation is that they're
not. Many fans/players are digging what 4 has to offer so far and if the huge enthusiasm for the 3DS version is anything to go by, the Wii U version should not have any problems establishing its own competitive base and later being able to hold its own against the behemoth that is Melee in the tournament scene.