I actually find it a bit sad that people believe it is so unbelievable that Wii U is more powerful than horribly dated hardware.
Wii is more pwerful than last gen's consoles right?
So then is it really so hard to believe that Wii U is more powerful than 6-7 year old tech? It will be cheap to outdo them. I mean ****, entry level PC GPUs are more powerful than what the 360 and PS3 have to offer. 360 and PS3 weren't even top of the range when they were released, so really to outdo them would be a walk in the park.
WiiU's rumoured GPU is an R700, but the funny thing is, Wii's GPU even though it has no officially revealed legit specs, is capable of multidisplay tech, which wasn't present until the next generation of AMD/ATi GPUs.
But think of it this way, if Nintendo is using a high end tweaked R700, it has the power to run Crysis. That is not a small accomplishment, considering PS3/360 saw a gimpled down pathetic version of CryEngine 3 for Crysis 2. And yes, Crysis 2 looks worse than Crysis because of the dated pathetic nature of current gen.
It's not a question of if Nintendo is more powerful than the current gen, it's a question of whether Sony and MS' next systems will blow it out of the water, or rather if Nintendo can hold up graphically to the other companies' next gen systems.
If there are any typos, it's because I'm drunk, deal with it.