cookieM0Nster
Smash Champion
ok. if u dont care, why did you even respond?You pointed out something no one could possibly care about like someone cares. Think harder.
now good bye.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
ok. if u dont care, why did you even respond?You pointed out something no one could possibly care about like someone cares. Think harder.
It's not an inside joke.How are people supposed to figure out inside jokes
I don't think they're suppose to.How are people supposed to figure out inside jokes
lolironyhow could be dumber than him.
Falconv1.0 - "Hands off my bread!"
I bet the joke is really stupid.
No, it's not like that at all.Isn't the modskin just a green rehash of smashblue?
I want a good skin. like Germansmash skin good.
*Edit* I'm thinking of the backroom.
What does this mod skin look like?
Revolution is awful at higher resolutions.No, it's not like that at all.
The mod skin is the only good skin on smashboards imo. I used to like revolution but I think that was just because I was used to it haha. Wouldn't ever go back.
I'm going to hit you in the face. ._.The fact that people still don't get what cheesy means is beyond me.
^________^I'm going to hit you in the face. ._.
Wow.Not really.
Cool, random quote gave me my signature, read it and you'll see how epic it is.wikipedia said:In late 2005, the Free Software Foundation (FSF) announced work on version 3 of the GPL (GPLv3). On January 16, 2006, the first "discussion draft" of GPLv3 was published, and the public consultation began. The public consultation was originally planned for nine to fifteen months but finally stretched to eighteen months with four drafts being published. The official GPLv3 was released by FSF on June 29, 2007. GPLv3 was written by Richard Stallman, with legal counsel from Eben Moglen and Software Freedom Law Center.
According to Stallman, the most important changes are in relation to software patents, free software license compatibility, the definition of "source code", and hardware restrictions on software modification ("tivoization"). Other changes relate to internationalisation, how license violations are handled, and how additional permissions can be granted by the copyright holder.
Other notable changes include allowing authors to add certain additional conditions or requirements to their contributions. One of those new optional requirements, sometimes referred to as the Affero clause, is intended to fulfill a request regarding software as a service; the permitting addition of this requirement makes GPLv3 compatible with the Affero General Public License.
The public consultation process was coordinated by the Free Software Foundation with assistance from Software Freedom Law Center, Free Software Foundation Europe, and other free software groups. Comments were collected from the public via the gplv3.fsf.org web portal. That portal runs purpose-written software called stet. These comments were passed to four committees comprising approximately 130 people, including supporters and detractors of FSF's goals. Those committees researched the comments submitted by the public and passed their summaries to Stallman for a decision on what the license would do.
During the public consultation process, 962 comments were submitted for the first draft. By the end, a total of 2,636 comments had been submitted.
The third draft was released on March 28, 2007. This draft included language intended to prevent patent cross-licenses like the controversial Microsoft-Novell patent agreement and restricts the anti-tivoization clauses to a legal definition of a "User" or "consumer product." It also explicitly removed the section on "Geographical Limitations", whose probable removal had been announced at the launch of the public consultation.
The fourth discussion draft, which was the last, was released on May 31, 2007. It introduced Apache License compatibility, clarified the role of outside contractors, and made an exception to avoid the perceived problems of a Microsoft-Novell style agreement, saying in section 11 paragraph 6 that
You may not convey a covered work if you are a party to an arrangement with a third party that is in the business of distributing software, under which you make payment to the third party based on the extent of your activity of conveying the work, and under which the third party grants, to any of the parties who would receive the covered work from you, a discriminatory patent license
This aims to make future such deals ineffective. The license is also meant to cause Microsoft to extend the patent licenses it grants to Novell customers for the use of GPLv3 software to all users of that GPLv3 software; this is possible only if Microsoft is legally a "conveyor" of the GPLv3 software.
Others, notably some high-profile developers of the Linux kernel, commented to the mass media and made public statements about their objections to parts of discussion drafts 1 and 2.
I got that the first time, but the way everyone was acting confused and/or "in the know" made me think that I missed something.^________^
Come on now, cheesy=lame/stupid/cheap, how do you not get this. I made a cheesy joke, it aint easy being cheesy bro. But no, LET'S ALL FOCUS THAT THE PIC WAS FROM FAMILY GUY.
It looks good.Isn't the modskin just a green rehash of smashblue?
I want a good skin. like Germansmash skin good.
*Edit* I'm thinking of the backroom.
What does this mod skin look like?
Chester is snorting cheetos which shows that his life isn't all that it's cracked up to be (fame, fortune, etc) and shows his life isn't easy. being cheesy.Well family guy sucks but its not the point of the inside joke.
Go fishing for more clues.