I don't go telling people that something or someone isn't confirmed yet if they're discussing the character/feature. I'll tell them that it's not in if they're talking about the thing as if it is confirmed.
The best example is nuro, and his thread about interchangeable movesets. I don't really like the idea, but it is a possibility. However, in his thread he gives plenty of 'evidence' that proves the feature is in the game. His 'evidence' is stuff like the puddle in rumble falls, which he uses as the only way that Mario can charge FLUDD while shielding, which he somehow uses as proof of interchangeable movesets.
Now i will argue with him until the end, because every item of 'proof' he uses is useless and in no way hints towards customizable movesets.
People who do it randomly just to be ***** are just that, *****, but i cannot stand when people claim stuff to be confirmed when it is in fact, not.
The best example is nuro, and his thread about interchangeable movesets. I don't really like the idea, but it is a possibility. However, in his thread he gives plenty of 'evidence' that proves the feature is in the game. His 'evidence' is stuff like the puddle in rumble falls, which he uses as the only way that Mario can charge FLUDD while shielding, which he somehow uses as proof of interchangeable movesets.
Now i will argue with him until the end, because every item of 'proof' he uses is useless and in no way hints towards customizable movesets.
People who do it randomly just to be ***** are just that, *****, but i cannot stand when people claim stuff to be confirmed when it is in fact, not.
