BSL
B-B-B-BLAMM!!!
I can just not replace if asianaussie wants to play.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You can still play a character. Just use a vocabulary you are actually familiar with and not one you are failing to become familiar with. Following up a misuse of the concept of "rhetorical question" with "a question deserves an answer" immediately after being shown the definition of a rhetorical question and egotistically shrugging it off is ... not only absurd, but the best example I could ask for.Actually, the quote is as much related to the game as our identity. It's purpose was to portray how this hydra would work and how we wanted to play this game. The quote is identifiable in the change in attitude and more sophisticated way of communication.
But in the end, I don't have a problem with taking it off , as it bares worthless now. I truly doubt that trying to meta us or trying to understand how we operate this game would deem insufficient (EE addition: wtf) anyways. I did not plan this.
Like I'm legit foreseeing all the goddamn dozens of nightmarish TvT null-tells-explode-into-a-game-draining-argument scenarios that can come from this and they're the exact kind of **** that made me retire in the first place
<3 eesoup can you please stop with the "smart"speak.
Real talk: Your grammar and verbiage when you do this is a ****ing nightmare. It looks like you wrote it while drunk and then fixed the spelling the next day without looking at the content. It's going to make you a nightmare to read, and not in the "hur hur my po po poker face so good" kind of way, in the "what the **** is this ****" kind of way.
I see what you're trying to do. It's not working. Stop.
It's ****ing pregame and we've already had some level of miscommunication between your poor use of two-dollar words and haughtiness when called out on it.
You can still play a character. Just use a vocabulary you are actually familiar with and not one you are failing to become familiar with. Following up a misuse of the concept of "rhetorical question" with "a question deserves an answer" immediately after being shown the definition of a rhetorical question and egotistically shrugging it off is ... Not only absurd, but the best example i could ask for.
Shave off the verbosity because it's adding jack **** to your play and i'm not dealing with that for an entire game. I won't.
Inb4noeeushutupurnotmyrealdadidowatiwant
sadly i have read my role pm
any chance BSL can replace someone else? if he's already read the role pm he can just have the spot, ill in another game maybe
Or you guys could just hydra.I've read it, but you stay in. I'm here to replace, and you don't need to be replaced. You wanted to be in this game, so play it.
Oh, we are going to get along well.Soup can you please stop with the "smart"speak.
Real talk: Your grammar and verbiage when you do this is a ****ing nightmare. It looks like you wrote it while drunk and then fixed the spelling the next day without looking at the content. It's going to make you a nightmare to read, and not in the "hur hur my po po poker face so good" kind of way, in the "what the **** is this ****" kind of way.
I see what you're trying to do. It's not working. Stop.
It's ****ing pregame and we've already had some level of miscommunication between your poor use of two-dollar words and haughtiness when called out on it.
You can still play a character. Just use a vocabulary you are actually familiar with and not one you are failing to become familiar with. Following up a misuse of the concept of "rhetorical question" with "a question deserves an answer" immediately after being shown the definition of a rhetorical question and egotistically shrugging it off is ... not only absurd, but the best example I could ask for.
Shave off the verbosity because it's adding jack **** to your play and I'm not dealing with that for an entire game. I won't.
inb4noEEushutupurnotmyrealdadidowatiwant
it's so not even the grammar he's getting on you about. It's the things you're doing. Things like asking a rhetorical question, and then demanding an answer to it because the character you've made up in your head would demand answers. Guess what? Rhetorical questions don't require answers. That's, like, the definition of what "rhetorical" means.
If it requires an answer, it's not rhetorical. Stop trying to use big boy words you don't understand.He ignored me, and he ignored the rhetorical question too. "He seems nervous, but what could it be?" Don't you find it illogical for someone to respond like that? I wasn't impressed with it at all and it only makes me go back to my original stance before. The joke was completely out of context.
Too bad. You're soup and swords. You don't think you're going to read L and wonder which one of us is posting? That's who you are.Now, for the sake of the game:
Is your concern with my wording something that is actually bothering you, or is it just a personal gripe? I thought to make very clear to not treat this account like me or swords. I'd really love this game to start so I can actually do things instead of twiddling my thumbs.
I have a couple of questions, if you're willing to answer me.
Or awesome.which would render the whole rule about private information being not necessarily accurate superfluous.
Assumption: Sworddancer knew the alignment prior to hydraing which in itself is impossible. If it were the case, Soup would be modkilled for discussing his role PM with someone outside the game.Sworddancer decided to join the hydra after soup had received his role PM and I know Sworddancer well enough to understand that he wouldn't hydra with somebody who received anything other than a townie role PM.