• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

This hand of mine is burning red!

Jam Stunna

Writer of Fortune
BRoomer
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
6,450
Location
Hartford, CT
3DS FC
0447-6552-1484
Link to original post: [drupal=2749]This hand of mine is burning red![/drupal]



It's loud roar tells me to write something!

In all seriousness though, I made a blog a few months ago where I lamented my inability to write. I was having any ideas, school was kicking my butt, personal problems, etc. But since then, things have improved on every front. The semester is winding down and giving me more free time. Things have greatly improved in my personal life, and ideas are coming to me. I can literally feel the desire to write starting to burst out of my chest, in a good way.

I'm just having a hard time fully coalescing one idea. I get bits and pieces of interesting things that I can't exactly put together into a coherent idea: a child’s relationship with their mother; dragons; post-colonial issues; the sectional divide between the North and the South prior to the American Civil War (that one is a direct result of a fascinating class I'm taking this semester); fantasy elements I'd like to incorporate; the huge effect that Battlestar Galactica had on me in terms of what I expect from television and my subsequent (albeit only half-serious) desire to write something for television of that caliber; and hundreds, if not thousands, of other little fragments floating around in my head, looking for a home on paper.

Part of me wants to write something serious and "real-life", and a part of me wants to write something more sci-fi or fantasy based. I've always had a big internal struggle with that. As I've written in past blogs, my earliest memories of writing are writing Star Trek and Dragonball Z fanfics. For some reason, I associate that with my amateur status as a writer back then, and I can't help but feel that if I'm ever going to progress as a writer (and be taken seriously), I need to leave that "kiddie stuff" behind and write more in the vein of Hemingway or Faulkner or whatever. I know that's the wrong way to look at it, and I truly love sci-fi and fantasy. I suppose it's just my inner nerdom coming into conflict with my intellectual elitism (a very common trait among New Englanders): no matter how much I love the geek stuff, it's not "real" art, it's just genre stuff. And I know for a fact that I do not want to be identified as a genre writer.

It's a conflict that I must resolve before I can truly put my full efforts behind anything, no matter what I decide it to be. Ideally, I guess I would like to use sci-fi/fantasy settings to tell universal stories. And that's the point of sci-fi and fantasy anyway: to put social and moral issues in a setting that's just fantastic enough that people don't get offended by your message. Think about the episode of Star Trek where the aliens were half-black and half-white and they were at war with each other. That was obviously a shot at prejudice, but put in a setting where people would say, "Those aliens are stupid for hating someone based on what they look like!", instead of saying "I'm stupid for hating someone based on what they look like!" You can get an audience to say the former, but not the latter.

Anyway, these are a few ideas I've been kicking around for months, years even. Maybe putting them out on paper will help me to evaluate how serious I am about them.

1) Because I Love You re-write

A year ago, I wrote a short story entitled Because I Love You, and submitted it to Glimmer Train. I can look back on the story now and recognize what I did wrong. I conceived the story as being about how the main character deals with her unexpected pregnancy, but it became about the relationship between herself, her sisters and her mother. I think that it actually had the potential to become a really great story, but because I didn't approach it as a family drama from the beginning, the whole thing wound up being overlong and underdeveloped, at the same time. I mean, I used 6400 words and didn't make a point, because I wasn't sure what the point was until after I'd finished it. That's been a consistent problem for me. I start writing one story and end up with another when I'm done.

But I think that a story about how a young woman, on the brink of being a mother, deals with her own mother is a very good story, if only I can tell it the way it should be told. The thing that compels me the most to tackle this story again is that I sometimes find myself thinking about Rachel (the main character), and how she and her sisters are doing. Once you create a character, they become a real person, and they live outside of the story that you've put them in. I think about Rachel, and I want to visit her again, just to check in.

2) Children of Heaven, Version 1

A few years ago, I wrote a story about a half-dragon, half-human girl who gets caught between the two worlds. Nothing terribly original, but the story was supposed to be the beginning of a novel. I got about 10,000 words in and never finished it. That novel was going to be the beginning of an entire world, filled with many different characters and conflicts and followed over hundreds, maybe thousands of years. The inspiration for that was J.R.R. Tolkein's persistent world for the Lord of the Rings, and William Faulkner's creation of an entire imaginary southern county as the backdrop for the stories he wrote. The fantasy elements were derived from Fire Emblem; in fact, the whole thing really started as a Fire Emblem fan game that I still have extensive notes for. I wanted to move beyond the game though, and that's where the idea for an entire universe, told in short story and novel form, was born.

My big problem here is that while I like the idea (and I absolutely love dragons), I really have nothing original or interesting to say. An evil empire bent on conquering everything? Check. A half-breed character caught between two worlds? Check. Heroes of destiny, legendary items, dark forces and reluctant saviors? Check, check, check, check. I want to tell the story, but I want it to be a GOOD story, and not just "Jamil Ragland Retells the Same Fantasy Story You've Heard for the 10,000th Time." At some point I want to write a dragon story, but I'm going to need a better idea than the one I've been sitting on.

3) Children of Heaven, Version 2

This is the most recent of the ideas, and it's the one that was inspired by Battlestar Galactica. The basic setup is that humans have colonized an alien world that's already inhabited, and the story takes off from there. Once again, been there, done that. But movies and other media that have tackled this subject (Battle for Terra, the upcoming Avatar, etc.) usually focus on the battle for the planet, or resistence or whatever. That would be in my story as well, but only as a part of the whole. In this story, this planet has been colonized for generations, and the story begins when the colonized peoples (let's call them counter-humans, for simplicity's sake) are ready to revolt. All of this would happen at the beginning. Like BSG, where the annihilation of humanity happens in the first hour of the show, and the story is about the aftermath. That's how I would want this story to be. The beginning would show colonization so that the audience knows exactly what the counter-humans are up against, but the main focus of the story is on post-colonial effects and rebuilding the counter-human society.

I've envisioned this as a television show, but that's only wishful thinking (once again, influenced by BSG). I don't know the first thing about writing scripts or production or anything like that, so while in a "world's perfect" dream this would be a TV show, I'm not wedded to the idea for practicality's sake. What form it would take (a series of short stories, a novel) isn't clear to me, but I'm still developing the idea. I imagine humanity, with very advanced technology and a 19th-century attitude towards indegenous peoples, colonizing a planet with people not unlike Native Americans. Basically, it would be Manifest Destiny in a sci-fi setting, minus the slavery (possibly; I think adding slavery to it makes it far too complicated and destroys the colonial/post-colonial commentary, but if I can find a way to make it work, I'm not opposed to the idea). We're there for economic gain, but we're also going to "civilize the heathens".

Like I said, there would be some fighting, and of course the rebellion would occur, but once again that would only be the beginning. Some of the themes I've thought of tackling are how much contact do the counter-humans maintain with Earth, the former colonial power (think about Great Britain and India's relationship today); do the counter-humans go back to the "old ways" when the humans leave or rebuild their society based on human civilization; how does religion play into subjugating a conquered people and do the conquered people maintain their faith after colonization is over (think the relationship between slave masters, slaves and Christianity, and how Christianity is still a critical part of the African American community today. Assume there is a God and that Christianity is the true way to reach Him. Does it de-legitimize the "true path" because the religion was forced on a people?); how do counter-humans who actually benefitted from colonization react to the end of it, and how are they treated by other less fortunate counter-humans; how do counter-humans even begin to get along with each other and work together?

There are tons of things to discuss and areas to go into, and I think that this story has the greatest potential to be something special, but by the same token it will also be the most difficult to produce, by far.

Anyway, this has already gone on much longer than I thought it would. Just getting some things out, trying to calm the loud roar that tells me to grasp victory!
 

DtJ Jungle

Check out my character in #GranblueFantasy
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
24,020
Location
Grancypher
I'd be really interested to see how "Because I love you" turns out if you ever rewrite it. It definitely sounds like you know in which direction you need to go with that short story.
 

Darkslash

Smash Master
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
4,076
Location
Strangereal Equestria
Link to original post: [drupal=2749]This hand of mine is burning red![/drupal]



It's loud roar tells me to write something!!
UNDEFEATED SCHOOL OF THE STUNNA!

LOOK THE INSPIRATION IS BURNING RED!



Well Jam if there's one thing I could recomend is, (if you havn't) , is to read the Inheritance cycle by Christopher Pollani. He manages to turn something genricish (dragons, medevial weapons, evil empire, farm boy) and makes it enjoyable.

Or maybe my taste in reading is poor. Who knows.
 

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,167
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
I absolutely love fantasy, and to me what makes a fantastic character in a fantasy story is someone normal. That's the best way I can put it. I think when it comes to fantasy, we let clichés and norms cloud our ideas.

When it comes down to it though I think of the situations I'm creating, and then imagine how I would react, how my friends would react, my family, random people I've met etc.

Fantasy can be a great setting for allowing any message you're trying to convey to be brought out more clearly. Fantasy is meant to give us a great deal of freedom, but the problem with people trying to write fantasy is that instead of allowing the nature of their writing to free them up, they let it become more restrictive than something based on reality.

It's a tough game, but I think if you have purpose behind your writing and a powerful enough imagination, anybody can produce an amazing tale, as long as they work on it a lot and keep the ideas rolling.

I would always say don't be put off writing fantasy, but then that's just me, someone who doesn't live in the real world 90% of the time.

Whatever you feel is giving you the biggest buzz is what you should go with. That's what I say.

FANTASY
 

altairian

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
1,594
Location
Ballston Spa, NY
I'm curious why you're so against being a "genre" writer? Yeah, there are plenty that are pretty average, but there are some fantastic fantasy writers. My favorite author is RA Salvatore, and going along with Teran's post, his series about Drizzt Do'Urden can literally help you mature as a person as his characters mature and deal with more serious situations. And as far as I know, RA Salvatore is a pretty respected author.
 

highfive

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
1,324
Location
Buhl, Idaho
I understand what your going through Stunna. I wrote "Slugs and Mirages" a few months? Weeks? I have no clue... ago. And now I have several great ideas but I'm scared to write a crappy story.

One (stolen idea from Constantine, the film) of them dealing with time, religion, death, and choices. It sounds great in my mind but when I try and write it seems too long and boring, just a string with loose ends and no true purpose.
 

Big Red

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
223
Location
Just West of Chicago
Glad to hear things are startin' to look up for you Jam. :)

As for your writing problem, I understand exactly where you are coming from. I struggle with the same question myself sometimes. I disagree with you, though, in saying that Sci-Fi and Fantasy stories are too childish to be taken seriously. I think they can deliver just as much thematically as they can with how enjoyable they are. My favorite Sci-Fi author Frank Herbert is paraphrased here by his close friend Bill Ransom:

"He [Frank] also believed that science fiction was the only genre whose subject matter attempted to define what it is to be human. We use contact with aliens or alien environments as impetus or backdrop for human interaction."

I could not agree more, and I think the same applies for fantasy. The two genres provide a very unique canvas for analysis of the human condition. How do we react to that which is foreign? How do we treat each other in the midst of a common threat? Where do we turn when we find we are not alone? What is human, and what is alien? These are serious topics, certainly not childish and in my opinion science fiction and fantasy provide the best, if not only, backdrops upon which they can be examined.

The most important thing I can tell you is to just write. I think every writer feels a certain anxiety when they approach the computer. Do I want to write this story? What if it is a waste if time, if it does not go anywhere? The answer is: Who cares? Write a lot, eventually something will begin to flesh out with direction that excites you. Like you said, it is impossible to determine what a story will end up when you set out to write it, so why let it bother you. The perfect story does not start perfect. So if you write something that turns out crappy, no matter, just one less idea fighting for dominance in your head.

So yeah, good luck on the writing front, and with everything else in your life.
 

El Nino

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 4, 2003
Messages
1,289
Location
Ground zero, 1945
I can literally feel the desire to write starting to burst out of my chest
Like in the movie Aliens? If so, I can sort of relate.

I remember that Star Trek episode too.

Good to hear that things are going well for you and that you're feeling inspired to get back into writing.

Like you, I started out in science fiction and fantasy. I still identify as someone who reads and writes genre. But I've been reading a bit of non-genre lately, and I can see why you would prefer that label over sf/f. There's a lot that literary fiction does better than genre, but the same is also true in reverse.

For me, I'd rather be considered a genre writer. It's more familiar territory. I wouldn't know high art if it bit me in the face and gave me rabies. But I'm starting to realize that none of my ideas are anything new as far as genre goes.

I think your ideas have analogues in either category. You could probably do both, depending on each specific story concept, and see where it takes you.

Edit: I wasn't a big fan of Eragon, to be honest, though I gave it a chance up until page 88. Then I put it down, forgot about it, and gave it to a neighbor to sell at the flea market.

And that's the point of sci-fi and fantasy anyway: to put social and moral issues in a setting that's just fantastic enough that people don't get offended by your message.
That's the point of a lot of sf/f, true. But I'm developing a thing for contemporary science fiction. "Hard science fiction" is just a much smaller niche market compared to the greater sf/f market.
 

Jam Stunna

Writer of Fortune
BRoomer
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
6,450
Location
Hartford, CT
3DS FC
0447-6552-1484
I'm curious why you're so against being a "genre" writer? Yeah, there are plenty that are pretty average, but there are some fantastic fantasy writers. My favorite author is RA Salvatore, and going along with Teran's post, his series about Drizzt Do'Urden can literally help you mature as a person as his characters mature and deal with more serious situations. And as far as I know, RA Salvatore is a pretty respected author.
It's not that I don't respect genre writers, it's just not something that I want for myself. In the unlikely event that I get published someday, I don't want to write a literary short story and have people react by saying, "But isn't he a sci-fi writer?" or vice-versa. If I want to write sci-fi on Monday, fantasy on Tuesday and literature on Wednesday (I hate the term "literary work" by the way, it's so elitist), I want to do so without worrying about the labels.
 

Jam Stunna

Writer of Fortune
BRoomer
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
6,450
Location
Hartford, CT
3DS FC
0447-6552-1484
Sorry for the double-post, but I figured this needed its own post.

I read the following essay a few minutes ago, and it pretty much embodies most of the things that I find problematic with writing. It gets treated like a religious experience ( I think the author of the essay actually uses that phrase), and you see words like "magical", "miraculous", "extraordinary" thrown around all the time in reference to the writing experience. And you know, I just don't feel that way about it. I have a much much less ephemeral experience when I write; I'm not saying that my feelings are right and theirs are wrong, but it does seem a little self-gratifying to speak of writing in such majestic ways. Maybe that's why I'll never be any good at it, because I don't see it as a spiritual event. I like to tell stories, not connect with the ether or whatever. But that's just me, maybe you'll see it a different way.

Here's the page the essay comes from if you want to read it there, or some of the other essays posted there:

http://www.fishpublishing.com/writing-short-stories.php#power

Introduction to the 1997 Fish Anthology, Dog Days & Other Stories,
by Joseph O’Connor

What kind of strange creature is a short story writer? I must confess that I don’t know. A high priest or priest of art? A wounded soul who can’t understand the real world and thus feels a need to re-invent it? A moralist? A Spinner of yarns? An entertainer? A prophet? Probably all of these things. Possibly none.

The single fact I can be sure about is this: writers are watchers. The one and only thing they have in common is an ability to look at the everyday world and be knocked out by it. Stopped in their tracks. Startled. Gobsmacked.

My favourite short story writer, Raymond Carver, has this to say:

Writers don’t need tricks or gimmicks, or even necessarily need to be the smartest fellows on the block. At the risk of appearing foolish, a writer sometimes needs to be able to just stand and gape at this or that thing – a sunset, or an old shoe – in absolute and simple amazement.

Another writer I love, Flannery O’Connor, put it even more strongly:

There is a certain grain of stupidity that the writer of fiction can hardly do without, and this is the quality of having to stare, of not getting the point at once.

There is only one trait that writers have in common and that’s it. They watch for the extraordinary magic that lies in the everyday. A writer is always quietly looking and thinking. Not willing inspiration but just being open to the world. This quiet looking and thinking is the imagination. It’s letting in ideas. It’s trying, I suppose, to make some sense of things.

In that sense, it is important for a writer to be always writing. Even when you’re not actually sitting with a pen in your hand. You don’t take days off. You don’t go on holiday from writing. Sometimes you don’t even go to sleep. If you’re serious about writing then you’re a writer twenty-four hours a day, in the office, in school, doing the dishes and in your dreams.

Writers have their eyes open. They keep them open all the time.

Ezra Pound said ‘fundamental accuracy of statement is the one morality of writing’. Naming things, calling things what they really are. This is all writers can do in an age where language has become debased and sterile.

James Thurber was a full-time writer. His use of his spare time is interesting:
I never quite know when I’m not writing. Sometimes my wife comes up to me at a party and says, ‘Dammit, Thurber, stop writing’. She usually catches me in the middle of a paragraph. Or my daughter will look up from the dinner table and ask, ‘Is he sick?’ ‘No’, my wife says, ‘he’s writing something’.

The short story is one of the greatest, most challenging, most infuriating forms of literature. They look so easy! That’s the thing about really good short stories. They don’t read like they were written. They read like they simply grew on the page. When we read the work of a short story maestro like Joyce or Frank O’Connor or Richard Ford or Alice Munro or Mary Lavin, we think, yes, there is just a rightness about that sentence, that image, that line of speech. But anyone who has ever tried to write a short story will know just how tough it is to hit that reverberating note, to say something – anything at all – worthwhile about the human condition, in five thousand words or less. It’s hard.

A short story is a glance at the miraculous. Joyce used a religious word. He called his stories ‘epiphanies’. A good short story is almost always about a moment of profound realization. Or a hint of that. A quiet bomb. There is a record by the American singer Tori Amos called Little Earthquakes. That’s a good metaphor for a short story. Often, a good short story will be a little earthquake.

It is a form that has all the power of the novel – some would say more – but none of the self-importance. A deftly imagined and carefully written short story like Karl Iagnemma’s Dog Days, or Frank O’Donovan’s Johnny Mok’s Universe, or Anne O’Carroll’s Flame, by concentrating on the particular, can say a whole lot about the universal.

So let us get idealistic for a second or two. V.S. pritchett’s description of a short story is ‘something glimpsed from the corner of the eye, in passing’. And our task as short story writers is to grab that moment with both hands and invest it with all of the power and humanity and sympathy we can. To develop our skill at language and characterisation and structure and dialogue – our fundamental accuracy – for one reason. To tell the truth. That’s what all the hard work comes down to in the end.

If we forget that, we forget everything.

Joseph O’Connor
Dublin
1997
 

El Nino

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 4, 2003
Messages
1,289
Location
Ground zero, 1945
That essay is a bit on the self-glorifying side. I think I've encountered worse though. Maybe writers are just really prone to delusions of grandeur.

In comparison, the opening of Bruce Sterling's preface to Burning Chrome seems to have a different tone:

"If poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world, science-fiction writers are its court jesters. We are Wise Fools who can leap, caper, utter prophecies, and scratch ourselves in public. We can play with Big Ideas because the garish motley of our pulp origins makes us seem harmless."

Gibson's own intro starts as:

"Nothing acquires quite as rapid or peculiar a patina of age as an imaginary future."

That could be paraphrased as: Nothing ages as fast as science fiction.

On the short story form, he says: "It's been argued that 'the single' . . . was the medium that defined the most perfect expressions of rock. . . . The same has sometimes been said of the short story and science fiction. . . It requires a very peculiar sort of literary musculature to write a very short piece of science fiction that really works."

I guess I respond to stuff like that better because it's more concise and to the point. At least it's more concrete than "something glimpsed from the corner of the eye, in passing." But that's just how I see it.
 

Jam Stunna

Writer of Fortune
BRoomer
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
6,450
Location
Hartford, CT
3DS FC
0447-6552-1484
I agree. That's why I appreciated Stephen King's On Writing so much, because he has a pretty workman's approach to writing. It's not about all that other stuff, but it's about the nuts and bolts of writing. It's refreshing to hear someone describe it as a job as opposed to a calling or whatever.
 
Top Bottom