Diddy Kong
Smash Obsessed
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2004
- Messages
- 26,305
- Switch FC
- SW-1597-979602774
Roy's FE13 appearance would be way more justified however.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Roy's FE13 appearance would be way more justified however.
No... she is a version of Sheik specifically designed for TP (not Smash) that wasn't used in the final game. And if Sakurai would use the appearance of a character that didn't even make the final version of the game, he could definitely use a popular recent redesign of a character, even if the character doesn't effect the main storyline.Sheik didn't even exist in Twilight princess, she is is just a more realistic version of Sheik nothing more.....
IS's reasoning for the redesigns, whatever it may be, won't effect whether they are implemented or not in Smash. That's up to Sakurai.I'm pretty sure if Intelligent System weren't lazy about the Models and the making of DLCs, they wouldn't have made Roy look like that, I'm pretty sure they made the new artworks just for the fact that they had existing models and classes ingame and they didn't want to go the extra mile and make special Classes for each DLC.
So in a nutshell, they just made the Artwork for the sake of Awakening not for the sake of the character.
Problem is, your logic is flawed.
As you said yourself, Sheik did not exist in Twilight Princess (though had concept art), yet Sheik was given a TP inspired appearance.
Despite Roy being non-canon to Awakening, he does exist within the game. Meaning him using his Awakening artwork for his appearance is not a ****ing issue.
The solution is simple; give her a ****ing sword.Ok let's suppose Elincia was choosen for SSB4, (just imagine)....
This is Elincia newest art, and as I suppose if they would have Roy on his new art than there's no harm in putting Elincia in with her new art, but Wait last time I checked Elincia is a Sword user not a lance user, but as you can see that the only resemblance that the artist just implemented the physichal appearance of the character over an existing class in the game.
No, actually you refuse other people Logic....I should've not wasted my time making you see how flawed the DLCs are, they are not a reference of any sort. You're quite hardheaded, and BTW you are contradicting yourself for the fact that you brought up Sheik in the discussion and you are criticizing me for bringing Elincia? I just brought Elincia for the sake of the argument.The solution is simple; give her a ****ing sword.
Does simple logic REALLY not come to you?
Aside from that, we're talking about Roy, not Elincia. Roy still has a sword. Argument invalid.
I'm not dumb it's just you are not smart enough to understand my logic...Wouldn't they just use whatever he'll have in SMTxFE? And isn't that probably his regular outfit? I prefer that one, even if the Mercenary outfit is great too. Gregor for Smash 4, folks.
Also Extreme Ike Dude is pretty ****ing dumb.
There are 2 ways to implement Roy or any other Lord to Fire Emblem awakening, it's either make a whole new model which time and space consuming or make an art based on an existing model in-game which is less time consuming. The art wasn't make for the sake the Roy will always be like that, the art was made so they can implement Roy in-game with the least amount of controversy, because if they updated Roy original artwork with that in-game model, people will begin to ask for their money back.Golden!
Get him.
EDIT: Ike-Sama, so you are saying that Roy should not be based on his DLC appearance because it is based on the mercenary and is not canon?
You are a complete dumbass, you know that?No, actually you refuse other people Logic....I should've not wasted my time making you see how flawed the DLCs are, they are not a reference of any sort. You're quite hardheaded, and BTW you are contradicting yourself for the fact that you brought up Sheik in the discussion and you are criticizing me for bringing Elincia? I just brought Elincia for the sake of the argument.
Note: My Logic is not flawed nor it's complicated, it's just that you are stubborn.
I better get credit for that.Golden!
Get him.
Okay, I get your argument. But to be honest, I think people are just happy to see Roy back. I don't think people would have disliked it if Roy looked just like the original.The art wasn't make for the sake the Roy will always be like that, the art was made so they can implement Roy in-game with the least amount of controversy, because if they updated Roy original artwork with that in-game model, people will begin to ask for their money back.
I'm sorry FalKoopa, but that damn Golden is just pissing me off....he think himself so high and above he is a hardheaded idiot, I really don't give a flying **** about his opinion anymore.Okay, I get your argument. But to be honest, I think people are just happy to see Roy back. I don't think people would have disliked it if Roy looked just like the original.
Going by your argument, Lyn was changed very less in her redesign. Were people unhappy with that?
Ah, but he IS correct, like it or not. Seriously, canon doesn't matter in Smash.I'm sorry FalKoopa, but that damn Golden is just pissing me off....he think himself so high and above he is a hardheaded idiot, I really don't give a flying **** about his opinion anymore.
No true scotsman?!And BTW, True Roy fans will always prefer the original....
Man, you just overdid it with the bolded S.Should SWF ever be Seized by Super Sized Slugs, I wouldn't be Scared in the Slightest because Diddy would be our Savior Since he is So Salty.
The dust has settled. Fallen to his knees, he tries to understand.Man, you just overdid it with the bolded S.
Five points for FalKoopa!No true scotsman?!
I'd rather be stubborn and right than be an idiot.Agree about GoldenY's stubbornness Ike-Sama. He's our angry little redhead of the forums though, don't always take him too serious please.
This is the funniest thing I've seen on here in a while.I'm not dumb it's just you are not smart enough to understand my logic...
Hmmm dye your hair red then, it suits you better.
I'm also quite stubborn, but unlike you I won't be saying that I'm right. I just hold strong to my own personal opinion, that's all.