Gooper Blooper
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2014
- Messages
- 83
I'm a supporter! Sceptile was my first starter in my first pokemon game!!!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Thanks Goop Bloop, you have our thanks!I'm a supporter! Sceptile was my first starter in my first pokemon game!!!
Man this is the nicest gaming community I've ever been in :DThanks Goop Bloop, you have our thanks!
~Thanks for Posting~
I second this, coming from places like the old MLG forums and current Wrestling forums this place is great. I actually have had multiple arguments with people that didn't end up in personal threats and name calling. I can't say that happens much any other forum (though for the most part Reddit is a pretty good community).Man this is the nicest gaming community I've ever been in :D
Hmm. . .your Blaziken term was a lot more PG-13 than my idea. . . .Won't say it since you-know-what it probably is.I like the term Sceptilists. Sceptilists vs Blazikrats. XD
Blazikannots? *bats eyelashes innocently*Hmm. . .your Blaziken term was a lot more PG-13 than my idea. . . .Won't say it since you-know-what it probably is.
Sceptilists is cool~
Just as I walked away letting Sceptile penetrate my grass mind, I came up with:
Scepstylists <-- my fav
Sceptilikes, these names
Very little topic to discuss, but if it were me, I'd say in favor of Sceptile that Yoshi not only got this change because he needed it to make him more up to date,but to give the dinosaur-like character to someone else. . .& who else could that be other than a resembling Dilophosaurus like Sceptile?In past Smash Brothers, yoshi moved like a dinosaur standing on two legs, with a bent back.
Don't be rude, share your milkshake with the rest of us, grab some more straws.Very, Very, VERY irrelevant point to make out, but did anyone remember when Sakurai made a certain change to a certain someone in Sm4sh, involving an eggstremely different change? No don't remember? Let's put it here for referance then.
It'sVery little topic to discuss, but if it were me, I'd say in favor of Sceptile that Yoshi not only got this change because he needed it to make him more up to date,but to give the dinosaur-like character to someone else. . .& who else could that be other than a resembling Dilophosaurus like Sceptile?
Shamrock shakes are out of season. straws are now in decline without any huge demand, why do you all keep making straws?!Don't be rude, share your milkshake with the rest of us, grab some more straws.
For the sake of the forest master, let's make that a shamrock shake.
Jokes aside, though it's a very, very small bit to favor Sceptile, it's interesting and a clever realization!
No offense at all to you, just going to ramble the thoughts that come to mind then let @ Masonomace be super cool about everything when they wake up (:After Blaziken, Sceptile is probably the most popular Hoenn Pokemon with a design that would fit well into Smash (I've been saying "fit well into Smash" a lot), and I admit that Sceptile would be a decent newcomer choice. Hell, if it did show up, I'd main it in a heartbeat. However, there are better character choices in Mewtwo, Jigglypuff, and Blaziken (ordered by likelihood, this is coming from someone who's a gigantic fan of Sceptile). Sceptile just lacks the significance of those three, and "muh fire-water-grass triangle" is a poor reason for its inclusion; Greninja wasn't even added because of its typing, that was just a coincidence. All in all, I don't think Sceptile is going to appear.
I gotchu, expect to be on it at least by tomorrowI support Sceptile and wish to be added to the list if I'm not already on it
Yo I'm here.No offense at all to you, just going to ramble the thoughts that come to mind then let @ Masonomace be super cool about everything when they wake up (:
I dont see it being any poorer of a reason than the triforce from zelda. Or the trio of sword axe lance in FE... Oh wait.. Also. Just because Greninja was revealed first doesnt mean he was chosen before another potential newcomer. He could have been chosen as the water typed after they decided on Sceptile over Swampert. He wasn't chosen based on popularity, we know that. Therefore Blaziken's advantage (other than type advantage) goes down the drain. I don't see a second fire starter getting priority over a grass. The trio has appearer in every installment (apparently) be it pokeballs or PKMN Trainer. I think if we get another new newcomer, it'll be a ivysaur replacement, and I doubt they'll give us another Captain Falcon clone over something with much more potential.(and yes I'm creative enough to make a non clone Blaziken moveset) We got Robin over the obvious Chrom. Logically Sceptile makes much more sense. I think the trio is more important than Mewtwo or Jiggs. I'd say its more important than pikachu to the game. I'm rambling. I just think they got two pokemon newcomers and Mewtwo back. So it was Chesnaught and Swampert vs Sceptile and Greninja. And they decide to not go with three heavy weight starters.
Before I begin, I think making sure your argument holds water is more important than worrying about "offending" anyone. "No offense" is never a good way to start off any response, because there's a 99.9999% chance the reader will infer that you're trying to be offensive in some way.No offense at all to you, [...]
And right after you imply no offense, the first sentence in your argument contains crude sarcasm? Ouch. Anyway, the "triforce from zelda" has nothing to do with Link's, Zelda's, or Ganondorf's recognition, nor does it have anything to do with their status as playable characters in Melee, Brawl, and probably Super Smash Bros. for Wii U/3DS. They're immensely popular and heavily demanded characters in their own right, so there goes your "triforce from zelda" analogy. I don't play Fire Emblem games, but I know enough to realize that there aren't nor have there ever been any lance- or axe-wielding characters in Super Smash Bros. What were you trying to argue there, and wouldn't the fact that there aren't even any prospective candidates for SSB4's roster from the FE universe that wield axes or lances hurt your argument that these supposed "trio"s are the ultimate factors in a character's inclusion?just going to ramble the thoughts that come to mind then let @ Masonomace be super cool about everything when they wake up (:
I dont see it being any poorer of a reason than the triforce from zelda. Or the trio of sword axe lance in FE... Oh wait..
In response to the first sentence here, that may be true, but please consider that there isn't any hard evidence of Sakurai knowing about Ruby/Sapphire remakes at the time Greninja was being worked on. Sakurai also never disclosed whether or not Greninja's typing had anything to do with its conclusion. For all we know, the template given to Sakurai by Game Freak was of a creature with an ambiguous elemental type.Also. Just because Greninja was revealed first doesnt mean he was chosen before another potential newcomer. He could have been chosen as the water typed after they decided on Sceptile over Swampert. He wasn't chosen based on popularity, we know that.
No, actually Sceptile's typing doesn't make it a more viable character choice than Blaziken. The "pattern" theory is weak, because it's known that Sakurai likes to swerve, troll, and do his own thing. Ill-perceived "patterns" don't supersede character relevance. Sceptile isn't notable enough, Blaziken on the other hand has been promoted by Game Freak for a while. Also, you should check this out.Therefore Blaziken's advantage (other than type advantage) goes down the drain. I don't see a second fire starter getting priority over a grass.
Firstly, that's not by any means "logical"; the "trio" is nothing more than an overblown observation. Secondly, there is no such thing as a "replacement" in the Super Smash Bros. series. Third, Chrom wasn't "obvious," just heavily speculated. According to Sakurai, Robin was chosen over him because of his unique moveset which incorporates magic attacks, differentiating greatly from the Fire Emblem swordsman staple. Finally, Blaziken wouldn't be "another Captain Falcon clone." Despite similar builds, Blaziken would be primed to have an entirely unique moveset, including an actual projectile in Flamethrower, a move with which it is heavily associated. What does hurt Blaziken's chances is its fire element (not because it's redundant with Charizard's in your "trio", but because several other characters use fire as well, like Ness, Mario, Ike, and Bowser), but that doesn't make it less viable than some random grass-type starter who everyone only began talking about after seeing Greninja's reveal.The trio has appearer in every installment (apparently) be it pokeballs or PKMN Trainer. I think if we get another new newcomer, it'll be a ivysaur replacement, and I doubt they'll give us another Captain Falcon clone over something with much more potential.(and yes I'm creative enough to make a non clone Blaziken moveset) We got Robin over the obvious Chrom. Logically Sceptile makes much more sense.
It's not more important. Mewtwo has unused data on Brawl's disc, more than any of the five characters from Melee that were cut. Jigglypuff has the most relevance after Mewtwo, if only because it's been in every game so far, has a simple, Kirby-like design, and has reasonable notability among casuals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jigglypuff#Promotion_and_reception). Sceptile doesn't have any of that, and neither do Chestnaught nor Swampert. I'm not even going to bother with your assertion that Pikachu is less important.I think the trio is more important than Mewtwo or Jiggs. I'd say its more important than pikachu to the game. I'm rambling. I just think they got two pokemon newcomers and Mewtwo back. So it was Chesnaught and Swampert vs Sceptile and Greninja. And they decide to not go with three heavy weight starters.
Replies are in the quote~In response to the first sentence here, that may be true, but please consider that there isn't any hard evidence of Sakurai knowing about Ruby/Sapphire remakes at the time Greninja was being worked on. Sakurai also never disclosed whether or not Greninja's typing had anything to do with its conclusion. For all we know, the template given to Sakurai by Game Freak was of a creature with an ambiguous elemental type.
If there was any evidence of Sakurai outright saying something alike another pokemon reveal due to Hoenn remakes that'd be a dead give-away, not to mention Hoenn remakes were gonna happen the moment the line of remakes beginning since FRLG. HGSS was out late 2009 - 10. Sakurai in interviews & sources claiming he finalized the roster in 2012 leads to believe that gap of time makes any game that's already developed or in development scale from HGSS all the way to ORAS, see this time-line if you're curious about the times. This promotes the idea that a pokemon from Gen 2, 3, 4, or 5 have a chance. Seeing how the pokemon that get nominated as choices for bieng newcoming fighters, it's heavy on voting for Starteres, or Legendaries.
No, actually Sceptile's typing doesn't make it a more viable character choice than Blaziken. The "pattern" theory is weak, because it's known that Sakurai likes to swerve, troll, and do his own thing. Ill-perceived "patterns" don't supersede character relevance. Sceptile isn't notable enough, Blaziken on the other hand has been promoted by Game Freak for a while. Also, you should check this out.
According to Smash Brothers' game-play, mechanics, & elements, Sceptile is just as viable of a playable character as Blaziken if not a little more. Character relevance is a factor worth mentioning from GF promoting pokemon through Smash Brothers, but character relevance is not a crucial reason that decides who gets on the roster & who doesn't, this point puts both Sceptile & Blaziken at equal chances. Nice source btw that was interesting despite it's date being March 2012, although in the end not too surprising. Also if you haven't seen this, then you should check out this source as well. It was also in March 2012.
Firstly, that's not by any means "logical"; the "trio" is nothing more than an overblown observation. Secondly, there is no such thing as a "replacement" in the Super Smash Bros. series. Finally, Blaziken wouldn't be "another Captain Falcon clone." Despite similar builds, Blaziken would be primed to have an entirely unique moveset, including an actual projectile in Flamethrower, a move with which it is heavily associated. What does hurt Blaziken's chances is its fire element (not because it's redundant with Charizard's in your "trio", but because several other characters use fire as well, like Ness, Mario, Ike, and Bowser), but that doesn't make it less viable than some random grass-type starter who everyone only began talking about after seeing Greninja's reveal.
The starters being in the first games no matter how they appeared in the game through Cameo appearances or through a game element, they still were in the game. Let alone making starters in 64 like Charizard & Blastoise pokeballs back then, was a huge step for Pokeball summons, that small step over-time gets bigger & bigger, to the point of starters finally getting playable. I won't speak much here but if I'm not mistaken wasn't so clone-worthy of despite Melee being the Clone Wars, & was scrapped technically replaced by ? Blaziken is a worthy mention of an idea for a pokemon fighter in Smash Brothers, but a few kicks, some punching, Flame element, & mainly that's all it has. You can justify for Blaziken but honestly you can factor Blaziken's total move-set a mixture of 2 characters, 3 if I felt like throwing Kyaputen Farukon at you for clone-alert. Honestly Blaziken is a cool idea but what would a mix of, 's flame elemental-based attacks, & 's fighting style of arm & leg attacks, & being automatically compared to due to his already made-up move-set since 64, leave Blaziken with to differentiate himself from all 3 of those characters, just a projectile Fire attack? Flame element is checked, Fighting style is checked, Blaziken is relevant from marketing & promotion through his games & the anime, along with a Mega Evolution, but is his fighting characteristics that unique to make a stand for himself among the pokemon fighters in Sm4sh? Blaziken's chances, of being different with his fire-based attacks, when automatically compared to Charizard (competition towards Charizards spot imo), won't be much different when you compare the other characters with a built-in Fire-based attack move aka . Too much Fire. I've wanted a grass type starter to be in the hypothetical Sm4sh since 2011 when I actually took a lot of notice during playing Brawl 's , & re-minded of playing Emerald again & again always using Sceptile, then playing Project M's in 2012, re-minded twice why a Grass type in a Sm4sh would be awesome.
It's not more important. Mewtwo has unused data on Brawl's disc, more than any of the five characters from Melee that were cut. Jigglypuff has the most relevance after Mewtwo, if only because it's been in every game so far, has a simple, Kirby-like design, and has reasonable notability among casuals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jigglypuff#Promotion_and_reception). Sceptile doesn't have any of that, and neither do Chestnaught nor Swampert. I'm not even going to bother with your assertion that Pikachu is less important.
The original quote you replied to I think was referring to the handheld game's element of the starter's types, being the trio G/F/W. Not really toward Smash relations with the other Pokemon characters? Idk about that. However Purin's popularity in Japan is high-class making her painfully relevant, while having the huge appeal to the anime for the first 2 regions traveled about Kanto & Johto, but lost relevance of the puff soon before Hoenn anime was introduced. At this point Purin's only relevance she has & needs is her career in Smash Brothers, with her easy to make look & being similar to Sakurai's baby Kirby, she seems to be a shoe-in but you can't be too sure.. And again relevance outside of the games isn't a huge impacting factor for pokemon to return or be announced as newcomers into Smash Brothers, Sceptile being a popular grass-type with his design & unique characteristics can easily prove himself to be a playable worth ycharacter in Smash Bros.. Pikachu is thee mascot of everything pokemon besides the hand-held games excluding Pokemon Yellow, which I'm thinking now, is Reality_Ciak's debate topic being based on the hand-held games.. I still don't know for sure on that.
On top of all this, the Pokemon Trainer was a complete failure as a character in Brawl. Its gimmick was impractical, as was the whole "type effectiveness" system, which likely went straight to the graveyard with the Trainer, Squirtle, and Ivysaur. What makes you think a system centered on such a terrible character would return in SSB4, working on characters that can't even switch out? Type effectiveness was eluded by the Pokemon Change, which won't be available to Charizard or Greninja, so that would surely cause problems with character balance, don't you think?
Heh, I'm glad we're not alking about Stamina / Fatigue Value, but no Smash Brothers game is balanced, IF you were to say 64, Melee, or Brawl were balanced fighting games then this discussion is over. Changing aka Pokemon Switch AKA Zero Switching the Advanced Technique, as a gaming element was lacking, it had uses, but 90% of the time it was a gimmicki being punish-worthy of the risk, forced switching made sense for the Pokemon's game logic. Sakurai making a note of the realistic game-play for pokemon switch when KO'd, implementing the Type Effectiveness mechanic was impressive, they were all mechanics exactly inspired by the pokemon games themselves. When almost 20 characters out of 40 have either a decent fire-based move or a Fire-based KO move, ofc that ****s on 's MU's being viable & balanced along with tethers getting ledge-hog treatment. With the overflow of Fire attacks, & the lack of true balancing out Type Effectiveness's & it's real intent & game-play, got the most advantage out of the 3, not affected by his own Fire type except taking heavy damage from in the ditto MU, making pokemon battles versus each other both sharing the Type Effectiveness mechanic. The hilarious part is Type Effectiveness only needs 2 balancing steps to make it balanced & successful:
1. Type Effectiveness accounts for all of the current elemental-based attacks, this applies to the already existing elements of: Flame, Freezing, Electric, Darkness, Water, Grass. Aura/Steel & any other element I missed out on saying, all account for the hand-held game's Type Chart's accuracy, making said pokemon strong against certain types, or weak against those certain type of attacks.
2. Balance out the Type Effectiveness mechanic making only PKMN VS. PKMN MU's have it occur, meaning if your PKMN being, , , , & are fighting against each oher, then the TE mechanic is active. Therefore it doesn't nerf the Pokemon's MU against any non-pokemon.
2 am rants of mine are not to be taken offensively or seriously. I was just racking up the thoughts that immediately crossed my mind. Twas the blunt truth not crude sarcasm. I was in no way trying to make a well organized argument, simply just throwing some ideas around. The typing trio only seems to mean nothing to people because it's grass type. If we had Charizard and a grass type, people would fully expect a water type. If we somehow had grass and water and no fire, people would be up in arms about their fire types. I think it's just starter preference bias for a lot of people. And before I say anymore, @ Masonomace is one of the coolest, least offensive people around here. I'm stopping unless called upon by Mason.Before I begin, I think making sure your argument holds water is more important than worrying about "offending" anyone. "No offense" is never a good way to start off any response, because there's a 99.9999% chance the reader will infer that you're trying to be offensive in some way.
And right after you imply no offense, the first sentence in your argument contains crude sarcasm? Ouch. Anyway, the "triforce from zelda" has nothing to do with Link's, Zelda's, or Ganondorf's recognition, nor does it have anything to do with their status as playable characters in Melee, Brawl, and probably Super Smash Bros. for Wii U/3DS. They're immensely popular and heavily demanded characters in their own right, so there goes your "triforce from zelda" analogy. I don't play Fire Emblem games, but I know enough to realize that there aren't nor have there ever been any lance- or axe-wielding characters in Super Smash Bros. What were you trying to argue there, and wouldn't the fact that there aren't even any prospective candidates for SSB4's roster from the FE universe that wield axes or lances hurt your argument that these supposed "trio"s are the ultimate factors in a character's inclusion?
In response to the first sentence here, that may be true, but please consider that there isn't any hard evidence of Sakurai knowing about Ruby/Sapphire remakes at the time Greninja was being worked on. Sakurai also never disclosed whether or not Greninja's typing had anything to do with its conclusion. For all we know, the template given to Sakurai by Game Freak was of a creature with an ambiguous elemental type.
No, actually Sceptile's typing doesn't make it a more viable character choice than Blaziken. The "pattern" theory is weak, because it's known that Sakurai likes to swerve, troll, and do his own thing. Ill-perceived "patterns" don't supersede character relevance. Sceptile isn't notable enough, Blaziken on the other hand has been promoted by Game Freak for a while. Also, you should check this out.
Firstly, that's not by any means "logical"; the "trio" is nothing more than an overblown observation. Secondly, there is no such thing as a "replacement" in the Super Smash Bros. series. Third, Chrom wasn't "obvious," just heavily speculated. According to Sakurai, Robin was chosen over him because of his unique moveset which incorporates magic attacks, differentiating greatly from the Fire Emblem swordsman staple. Finally, Blaziken wouldn't be "another Captain Falcon clone." Despite similar builds, Blaziken would be primed to have an entirely unique moveset, including an actual projectile in Flamethrower, a move with which it is heavily associated. What does hurt Blaziken's chances is its fire element (not because it's redundant with Charizard's in your "trio", but because several other characters use fire as well, like Ness, Mario, Ike, and Bowser), but that doesn't make it less viable than some random grass-type starter who everyone only began talking about after seeing Greninja's reveal.
It's not more important. Mewtwo has unused data on Brawl's disc, more than any of the five characters from Melee that were cut. Jigglypuff has the most relevance after Mewtwo, if only because it's been in every game so far, has a simple, Kirby-like design, and has reasonable notability among casuals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jigglypuff#Promotion_and_reception). Sceptile doesn't have any of that, and neither do Chestnaught nor Swampert. I'm not even going to bother with your assertion that Pikachu is less important.
On top of all this, the Pokemon Trainer was a complete failure as a character in Brawl. Its gimmick was impractical, as was the whole "type effectiveness" system, which likely went straight to the graveyard with the Trainer, Squirtle, and Ivysaur. What makes you think a system centered on such a terrible character would return in SSB4, working on characters that can't even switch out? Type effectiveness was eluded by the Pokemon Change, which won't be available to Charizard or Greninja, so that would surely cause problems with character balance, don't you think?
UGH I've been typing on & off, been busy all day =/.Great responses @ Masonomace and @ Reality_Ciak , I'm glad we could keep this civil.
Masonomace, you've got some good points there overall, and I especially agree that there are too many flame users, so many that Sakurai has to have taken notice by now. However, I'm still not convinced that Sceptile is deserving of a spot on SSB4's roster, especially not because it would complete a fire-water-grass triangle (and I'm still not convinced that that's anything but an overblown observation). If Sceptile was a GameFreak favorite instead of Blaziken, then its inclusion would be realistic, however as it stands, there are better character choices in Mewtwo and Jigglypuff, and Blaziken in the distant third that again, like you said, kind of gets hurt by there being too much fire (though Blaziken vs. Charizard is a very hyped matchup inspired by the anime, which negates the redundancy argument). That's not to say that Sceptile wouldn't fit into Smash Bros., I'm just saying it barely has a chance, if any. You're going to have to provide more than "Well, I like him." Yeah, I like him too. So show me an individual article on Wikipedia, recognition by Video Game publishers and magazines (one of two publishers that did take notice of Sceptile said that it's outclassed by Meganium, ouch; also, the link you gave me was from a website that isn't very notable) and demand by said publishers for an appearance in Smash Bros. That's how I think Sakurai considers characters. That said, I disagree with you on relevance; look at every roster so far, every character (even the cut 5 from Melee) has had major relevance to their respective universe. I'm not so sure there'd be any demand for a Water-type in the game if Sceptile somehow made it in instead of Greninja, either.
On type effectiveness, there'd be a ton of intricacies coming with it, but I agree that if it does return, it should be only between Pokemon, and every type should be considered (i.e., Charizard's up smash would do Flying damage, which would be resisted by Pikachu, etc.). On the whole, however, I'd rather it just not return. Every character should take the same amount of damage from every attack, regardless of their universe. I doubt Sakurai would make special cases for Pokemon, since he only did so once, and it was on a character that was highly unpopular and difficult to use effectively.
This is slightly unrelated, but I recently found out that Dark Pit is actually quite popular in Japan (16th most popular prospective Smash Bros. character, according to CoroCoro). Now it's more likely that we'll see him than Sceptile, unfortunately.
plus I happen to think Meganium outclasses him in almost every way.
These quotes straight from the source you gave were opinion-based & not entirely accurate. Off-topic not discussing Smash, Sceptile in the games is a close 2nd / 3rd place among the fully evolved grass starters said here:Okay, so Sceptile runs rings around Meganium in the Speed department but I'm still of the opinion that Meganium is the better Grass type overall.
Conclusion
Now we've gone through the quiet Grass-type Pokémon—Venusaur, Meganium, Sceptile, Torterra, and Serperior—and seen what they go for. Now, who stands out as the most solid Grass-type starter of all time? It should be clear.
Meganium just doesn't cut through, being a pretty mediocre Pokémon due to its stats, typing, and movepool. Serperior is similar to Meganium in its stats, but has a great Speed stat to get ahead of the competition, as well better moves to take advantage of; however, if Contrary Serperior were a reality at the moment, it would be fighting for a spot at the top. Torterra stands out for its pure power and versatility, sporting a great movepool; a really solid Pokémon throughout its few years on the field. Sceptile is a close second in this bout, as its great offensive power puts it ahead of the other three, but its frailty has been pushing it down the tiers throughout the years. This makes Venusaur the most solid Grass-type starter so far. Its constant positioning in UU as one of the best, and its current OU status, just shows how blessed this Pokémon is. Walk tall Venusaur; you really show what you need to succeed.
We'll get you ferioku, Thanks for Posting~Add me in as a supporter =D, My favorite grass type!
Ahh. .my mistake to the max. I didn't agree with those points either, which was why I unfortunately compared Meganium to the other Grass starters. I feel bad for that pokemon getting overshadowed so very hard but it repeats the fate that is Grass Starters. . .@ Masonomace : In my link, I wasn't saying I agreed with the IGN writer that Meganium outlclasses Sceptile (Meganium only has defensive uses, and even then is outclassed by the likes of Venusaur, Serperior, and Tangrowth), I was pointing out that, since she's a writer for a popular publisher (IGN), her opinion has some notability (albeit ill-informed).
I appreciate those links you posted, you've at least proven to me that fans mostly agree that Sceptile would be a better choice than Blaziken. However, that still doesn't strike out the innegligible Mewtwo and Jigglypuff. I'm sort of convinced at this point of two things: 1) Sakurai wants to do what he wants to do (helps Sceptile, plus there'd be a surprise factor in his inclusion as, like Ridley, he has a decent amount of demand, but at the same time isn't expected), and 2) Sakurai won't make any cuts, and will even find a way to implement some of the characters cut from Melee (Dr. Mario costume for Mario, and in Mewtwo's case, a full comeback). With all the space saved from there being no development-/storage-hogging Adventure Mode, the possibilities definitely look limitless, so wishful thinking is certainly justified.
I know what you mean. Four of the six grass starters though have been my favorites over the other starters (Treecko, Turtwig, Snivy, Chespin). Grass-types normally get the shortest end of the stick in terms of offensive and defensive typing (has the most weaknesses of any elemental type and is resisted by the most types, it's enough to bring one to tears , however they'll go from tears of sorrow to tears of joy when I destroy everything with Mega Sceptile in Omega Ruby ).Ahh. .my mistake to the max. I didn't agree with those points either, which was why I unfortunately compared Meganium to the other Grass starters. I feel bad for that pokemon getting overshadowed so very hard but it repeats the fate that is Grass Starters. . .
I also appreciate the decent conversations being posted here, shows we care<3. And you're right, without a 1000002300+ hours of work put into an Adventure mode, it definitely ruined character's playability in Brawl from the time restraints. But with that said, 7 playable pokemon was going to happen, my foolish wishing is prepared for 8 or still 7 since roster slots as a number means little to Sakurai. When Sakurai apologized ahead of time, it may have put a heavy burden on us to assume he'd actually cut Purin & Mewtwo but from an open-minded perspective, It's unlikely, too unlikely. But in case it takes place, the shocking news shouldn't be unprepared.
Off-topic because of some supporters coming by & wanting, would you like to?
Ohhhh, so you've liked Grass Starters since Gen 3 & up. Radical. All of it is true. . .but Mega Sceptile's debut will change all that. His meta will be praised for Grass / Dragon hype, Lightningrod will be great for doubles / predicatble switch-ins to Electric. Also I was asking you if you'd like to support Sceptile, whether he's in Sm4sh or not, through DLC & OmegaRuby & AlphaSapphire.I know what you mean. Four of the six grass starters though have been my favorites over the other starters (Treecko, Turtwig, Snivy, Chespin). Grass-types normally get the shortest end of the stick in terms of offensive and defensive typing (has the most weaknesses of any elemental type and is resisted by the most types, it's enough to bring one to tears , however they'll go from tears of sorrow to tears of joy when I destroy everything with Mega Sceptile in Omega Ruby ).
100% agree with the second paragraph lol.
As for your question: would I like to what?
Brawl was gonna have 7 pokemon slots. Sm4sh can get 8 pokemon slots if Sakurai wanted to. For Sceptile & a Gen. 5 rep too.IMO we will at least have Mewtwo and Jigglypuff added.
Then for Sceptile, he could appear as DLC or be on-disc, dunno.
Really, even if it seems weak, the fire-water-grass trio logic is not that far off. If they add Sceptile, we have the face of Pokemon (Pikachu), the most powerful legendary (Mewtwo), the trio starter (Char, Gre, Scep), the mascott of Gen 4 (Lucario) and one who found his spot in smash for all games (Jigglypuff).
Why can't it happen ? And maybe add a 5th gen Pokemon so every gens got a representation in smash and we are good.
This is a solution on what I might think they'd do it:I'm okay with him being DLC I guess. I mean if that's how he has to be put in. I'm curious on how DLC will be implimented. Will they be separated from the roster or integrated in? Because I would group the trio together.. I still think Jiggs is better suited for (free first day) DLC for the sake of organization and so Jiggs haters would have her cut and supports would have her instantly. But that's just how I see it. There would also have to be patches so people can play against them online. Would said patches make it possible to get DLC characters via Random? DLC shall be interesting if it truly is a thing. I just feel uneasy about it. Doesn't seem right. Unless it's just characters that were planned but cut for whatever reason.. So it's more of a fix than additional content.. Our only hint of DLC is Gematsu, right? Which has been compromised. I just find it out that Fire and Water were revealed together and then we are supposed to not expect Grass back too. I'm hoping Sceptile is just a secret character. DLC just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. For any character. Like I said unless it's just a fix. Which should be free. I'd pay for character swap clones and costumes. I mean I'd buy newcomers too but it seems wrong. I'd rather have them in the next game.
I like the term Sceptilists. Sceptilists vs Blazikrats. XD
1- Impossible; Game Freak will market ORAS. I cannot FATHOM ZERO representation (unless Grovyle gets in, or something like that. Even then, I doubt it, heavily. HEAVILY. Game Freak has an agenda, and as one of three current second parties involved in smash that we know about, they have a huge say. The other got in Lucina and Robin.)Re-posting here because why not, I wanna ask anyone's open opinion on how'd they feel with the 4 possible scenarios for Sceptile's destiny in SSB4:
Also to anyone who wants to fill in what makes Sceptile's chances more solid, example is the post I typed above.
- De-confirmed in total, not shown off, representing the character as an idea AT ALL, non-existent 100%. Thoughts?
- Pokeball summon. How would you feel & what would you like to see a Sceptile do once it appears? Discuss please.
- DLC becoming confirmed. DLC is still not pushed or hinted at all, to my decent knowledge of it, but how would you feel?
- Playable Status. Last & the best-case scenario, I almost don't even need to ask you about this because I wanted to have a 4th scenario for display. But if you feel like expressing a subjective or an objective post, please do so, there's never too much.
But... Jigglypuff's mad kicks! Those back airs of ultimate ass kicking.1- Impossible; Game Freak will market ORAS. I cannot FATHOM ZERO representation (unless Grovyle gets in, or something like that. Even then, I doubt it, heavily. HEAVILY. Game Freak has an agenda, and as one of three current second parties involved in smash that we know about, they have a huge say. The other got in Lucina and Robin.)
2- FRENZY PLANT; where he attacks character in the lead, whomever that is, because why not?
3- Delighted. He would still be playable. Marketed with ORAS. Proving he is vital to ORAS, I'd have personal satisfaction, perhaps more so than if he were actually playable, given the arguments I've had to make on his behalf to this forum. The fact that it would almost definitely be shortly after the games release means not long of a wait, either (and that it may even e free DLC)
4- I want him here, and I want it to knock out Jigglypuff :D
Naw; I finally would be okay with the pink puff, even if I would prefer King Boo to take her move set.
I just think Boo would utilize her move set much, much betterBut... Jigglypuff's mad kicks! Those back airs of ultimate *** kicking.
Frenzy Plant seems like an attack that would come from below and hit all around the stage, but could be avoided perhaps by taking advantage of higher platforms or positioning yourself between them. A contrast to the Ice Climber's where it hits the middle but his does not hit the middle perhaps?