• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

The Clank rule needs to change

ConeZ

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
184
Location
Georgia
All I know is this would affect 0% of Metaknight's matchups, so I am completely neutral!
 

pooch182

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
253
Location
Naperville
3DS FC
4227-3177-9014
Speaking of transcendence, when is Screw Attack gonna get some love? It being clankable is really ****ing stupid.
 

N00B64

Smash Cadet
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Messages
73
Location
brampton, ontario
Only issue I have with changing this is projectile clanking and swords. If we could have separate senarios for clanking programing then yeah change physicalVSphysical clanking ro 4%, but we don't have that sort of option. I'd say maybe Change it to 6% as long as you could still break projectiles with an well timed air move.
 

tasteless gentleman

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
492
I think we need more unclankable moves that just eat through other moves from heavy characters (come on they are already at a disadvantage)

And transendent moves suck lol
 
Last edited:

Bazkip

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
3,136
Location
Canada
I think we need more unclankable moves that just eat through other moves from heavy characters (come on they are already at a disadvantage)

And transendent moves suck lol
You want more transcendent moves but you say transcendent moves suck?
 

mimgrim

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
9,233
Location
Somewhere magical
You want more transcendent moves but you say transcendent moves suck?
Transcendent moves don't eat through other moves.

He's talking about rebounding moves which cannot be clanked out but do clank out all other moves (that aren't transcendent) no matter what.

Transcendent moves don't clank period and only register a hit when they meet a hurtbox.
 

Bazkip

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
3,136
Location
Canada
Transcendent moves don't eat through other moves.

He's talking about rebounding moves which cannot be clanked out but do clank out all other moves (that aren't transcendent) no matter what.

Transcendent moves don't clank period and only register a hit when they meet a hurtbox.
we need more unclankable moves
Transcendent = unclankable

Unless he said the wrong thing, he's talking about transcendent priority.
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Well technically, unclankable could be different from transcendent. Transcendent = no clank or attempted clank. Unclankable could = attempted clanks but the move always overpowers (Mario Jabs a Ganon Fsmash, minor clank animation looks like it plays (clank bubbles for example), Mario gets beaten out).

But that's like the same thing almost
 

Binary Clone

Easy Money since 1994
Joined
Jul 11, 2014
Messages
1,275
Location
Evanston, IL
I don't think that actually exists, though, is the thing. Beating out another hitbox is just based on damage.
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Well the person was talking about modifying attacks for heavy chars. That could imply new rules / mechanics
 
Last edited:

mimgrim

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
9,233
Location
Somewhere magical
I don't think that actually exists, though, is the thing. Beating out another hitbox is just based on damage.
I actually don't know if it even exists in Project M either to be perfectly honest.

Only Smash game where I'm pretty sure that type of attack is in is Smash 4 on Palutena's tilts I believe.
 

Player -0

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
5,125
Location
Helsong's Carpeted Floor
There are definitely moves in P:M that clank and still continue/hit person. I can't think of one right now though.

Palutena's shield attacks (Bair/Dash Attack) have unique properties. I believe her tilts are just disjointed (might be transcendent, idk).
 

tasteless gentleman

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
492
He meant moves that can't be beaten out but beat out other moves, as you can tell by the rest of the sentence.
Not sure who to quote or reply to but take bowsers dash attack as an example of what i want and bowsers flames as what i dont want.

Flames dont hit any projectiles which is annoying and suck.
Dash attack has armour and doesnt clank with any attacks but more like plows through them.
 

JOE!

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
8,075
Location
Dedham, MA
"Plow through" is a property of damage usually.

Say a move does 15%. It will straight up negate any moves that deal 0-7%, clank with any moves that deal 8-23%, and be beat by moves that deal 24%+. Only a handful of moves in the game deal more than 20% let alone 24% in a single hit, so this move would be able to clank with 95% of all grounded moves. VS an aerial, it wouldn't clank anyways but rather trade seeing as aerials do not clank... but if the move has Armor to "win" trades, then suddenly the move has great priority as few things can stop it unless you purposefully clank with a ground move at the right time.
 

tasteless gentleman

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
492
"Plow through" is a property of damage usually.

Say a move does 15%. It will straight up negate any moves that deal 0-7%, clank with any moves that deal 8-23%, and be beat by moves that deal 24%+. Only a handful of moves in the game deal more than 20% let alone 24% in a single hit, so this move would be able to clank with 95% of all grounded moves. VS an aerial, it wouldn't clank anyways but rather trade seeing as aerials do not clank... but if the move has Armor to "win" trades, then suddenly the move has great priority as few things can stop it unless you purposefully clank with a ground move at the right time.
No the move has special properties and DOES NOT CLANK
 

Binary Clone

Easy Money since 1994
Joined
Jul 11, 2014
Messages
1,275
Location
Evanston, IL
...Then we need more transcendent physical attacks with armour on them...
Hooow about no.

I feel like most people agree that tacking armor onto heavies is more of a band-aid than anything, and more of that isn't going to be fun to play against or do enough of substance to improve the characters on the whole.
 

standardtoaster

Tubacabra
Joined
Nov 26, 2009
Messages
9,253
Location
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
"Transcendent" is such an unclear term. I don't know who came up with it but it should really only be "can clank" or "cannot clank". Would drastically reduce confusion as seen here
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Bro that move is so good it transcends time and space

^^^ What the person thought of when coming up with the term
 

tasteless gentleman

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
492
Hooow about no.

I feel like most people agree that tacking armor onto heavies is more of a band-aid than anything, and more of that isn't going to be fun to play against or do enough of substance to improve the characters on the whole.
feel free to offer up some input on how to fix the fat fatties then.
 

PMS | LEVEL 100 MAGIKARP

Hologram Summer Again
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
3,303
Location
Tri Hermes Black Land
Reducing the "clank margin" would be a nerf to luigi.

Whoever said that using tornado to clank was a "situational usage" might be correct but

that situation is more often than not using tornado to get in on a fair-walling or dtilting marth and anticipating the clank and following up with a quick jab

removing this option would just emphasize the non-committal and campy luigi style

watch how abate used clanks in his sets with axe and s2j
 

trash?

witty/pretty
Premium
Joined
Jul 27, 2012
Messages
3,452
Location
vancouver bc
NNID
????
admittedly, I sort of assumed priority was something the PMDT didn't hold much control over, because last I recalled that's why metaknight still has transcendent priority on everything but his dash attack

or, uh, "unclankable", or whatever. there's a difference? I thought unclankable was literally just the more newbie-friendly term for transcendent
 

Bazkip

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
3,136
Location
Canada
admittedly, I sort of assumed priority was something the PMDT didn't hold much control over, because last I recalled that's why metaknight still has transcendent priority on everything but his dash attack

or, uh, "unclankable", or whatever. there's a difference? I thought unclankable was literally just the more newbie-friendly term for transcendent
Normally it can be changed, since it's probably just a true/false value, but apparently MK's stuff is hard coded so he specifically can't be changed.

And yeah there's no difference. There's no real reason for the term transcendent to exist since unclankable is much clearer.
 

CORY

wut
BRoomer
Joined
Dec 2, 2001
Messages
15,730
Location
dallas area
they don't clank, so the transcendent hitbox will go through, as well as the normal hitbox. at that point, it's all about lining up hitboxes with hurtboxes.

to be open: i don't know anything about bowser's hitboxes and hurtboxes on his dash attack, so i have no idea how those line up in relation to stuff, nor the armor frames on it.
 

Bazkip

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
3,136
Location
Canada
Generally you end up with a trade but depending on how the hitboxes and hurtboxes overlap only one or possibly even nobody will get hit.

The first hit of Bowser's dash attack ends up trading with other attacks, but since it has light armour it "wins" trades if the armour isn't beaten out.
 

Bazkip

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
3,136
Location
Canada
so transendent moves are < nontransendent moves?
It's only worse on aerial moves, since that means you can't use that attack to clank with projectiles. With grounded moves, it can be good or bad depending on the situation.
 
Last edited:

shairn

Your favorite anime is bad.
Joined
Nov 16, 2013
Messages
2,596
Location
Laval, QC
3DS FC
4742-6323-2961
Speaking of clanking: What's up with Roy fsmash clanking, then continuing on to ruin your day? Seems like the hitbox never goes away.
 

Bazkip

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
3,136
Location
Canada
Speaking of clanking: What's up with Roy fsmash clanking, then continuing on to ruin your day? Seems like the hitbox never goes away.
Cause the sweetspot deals 20% so if you hit it with an attack that deals 11% or less then your attack loses.
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Also blah blah Sweetspot priority over weaker hitboxes or some change idk

Edit: I still think my idea of changing frame advantage on clanks to favor the stronger move is a good one worth exploring. PMBR / PMDT / Rivals of Aether plz
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom