Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No. First sign of a misinformed, knows-nothing-about-gaming Nintendo hater, that "200th Mario" stuff.I got interested in Smash Bros. because I played older games like Mario Bros. All-Stars, Super Mario World, Yoshi's Island, Super Metroid and the first two Metroid Primes, Link to the Past, Wind Waker and Twilight Princess, Pokemon (Red to Crystal), StarWing, Donkey Kong Countries 1-3. The whole mashup thing was pretty cool.
Ultimately, I haven't played other Nintendo games since Twilight Princess. Mario just doesn't do it for me, and Link games seem very rudimentary to me given my exposure to RPGs. And don't get me started on that Metroid: Other M debauchery...
I've played Fire Emblem: Awakening, but that's about it. Smash continues my Nintendo interests, but I'm playing far too many non-Nintendo games to check the 187th Mario game.
I suppose I am also a misinformed, "knows-nothing-about-gaming" Nintendo hater as I also assumed that we were on our 100th Mario.No. First sign of a misinformed, knows-nothing-about-gaming Nintendo hater, that "200th Mario" stuff.
Then you probably are :/ We are on our 17th main series Mario game with 3D World, each one better than the last, also.I suppose I am also a misinformed, "knows-nothing-about-gaming" Nintendo hater as I also assumed that we were on our 100th Mario.
Ah, I see. It seems like they release those games twice every year (and their titles are so very similar); however, I also tend to count the spin-off games.Then you probably are :/ We are on our 17th main series Mario game with 3D World, each one better than the last, also.
Would you prefer the rate at which Activision churns out their games?Ah, I see. It seems like they release those games twice every year (and their titles are so very similar); however, I also tend to count the spin-off games.
Edit- I was reading this list. There are 148 titles that include Mario in the name, that is not saying much (as some are remakes or variations). It just really contributes to the mentality that there is an over-saturation of Mario. It makes him feel so much more redundant.
http://www.mariowiki.com/List_of_games_by_date
First, the spin-offs don't count, second, there's no such thing as too much Mario.Ah, I see. It seems like they release those games twice every year (and their titles are so very similar); however, I also tend to count the spin-off games.
Edit- I was reading this list. There are 148 titles that include Mario in the name, that is not saying much (as some are remakes or variations). It just really contributes to the mentality that there is an over-saturation of Mario. It makes him feel so much more redundant.
http://www.mariowiki.com/List_of_games_by_date
Or perhaps the rate at which Valve delivers their long-awaited, fan-requested sequels.Would you prefer the rate at which Activision churns out their games?
Um... yes? Is that a trick question?Would you prefer the rate at which Activision churns out their games?
They are still Mario games, and I count them. So I do not really care if you do not.First, the spin-offs don't count, second, there's no such thing as too much Mario.
Or perhaps the rate at which Valve delivers their long-awaited, fan-requested sequels.
You mean you want 2-9 games per year, depending on how many unnecessary sequels they can? (Tony Hawk, Guitar Hero etc.) They flood the market all right. I'd prefer the Valve method which seems to be just right with smashUm... yes? Is that a trick question?
They are still Mario games, and I count them. So I do not really care if you do not.
Clearly somebody has a problem with understanding an exaggeration when they see it. The point of my remark was to emphasise that Mario has been an extremely long-running franchise, and more often than not has been primarily the same game repeated, as would any other franchise that has lasted as long as Mario has.No. First sign of a misinformed, knows-nothing-about-gaming Nintendo hater, that "200th Mario" stuff.
Technically, the rate at which Call of Duty has been released, though deplorable, wouldn't be anywhere near the same amount. However, Mario is able to make so many games because it was a pioneer for video gaming in general. Call of Duty contributed next-to-nothing on the face of things, it just brought in RPG elements that had already been floating around in Counter Strike.Um... yes? Is that a trick question?
I agree. That's like saying that the Call of Duty mobile game doesn't count. If you slap a title on it that alludes to an established franchise in order to help it sell, I consider it part of that subsequent franchise. George Lucas made that awful Star Wars Holiday Special that he wants everyone to forget, but it's still part of the Star Wars franchise.They are still Mario games, and I count them. So I do not really care if you do not.
My sentiments exactly. I think Roy in Melee is a good example with that kind of attitude, and if I had to ask: Do most people want Roy to be back in Smash just because he was in Melee? Or because of his appearance and personality in the Fire Emblem games? I'm going to be honest here, but it bugs me a little that people want him back just solely because of the former.The bad side of this is that some players believe because they're great at Smash Bros means they know everything about the characters featured within the game. One well-known player last year at a tournament didn't even know that when Kirby eats another fighter, he gains their copy abilities. Or that "Wii Fit isn't on Wii U" even though the game was announced in 2011 alongside the initial reveal of the console. And I'm sure people have came across many situations such as this. But I digress.
Eh? You're probably talking about content, but objectively Mario Kart Wii's actually one of the worse and least balanced Mario Kart games. Also, two-player split screen at 60 FPS is a significant improvement over Mario Kart Wii's two-player split screen at 30 FPS. Four-player split screen has always been the same, which is capped at 30 FPS each screen.And to be honest I'm a little disappointed in Mario Kart 8. The game looks phenomenal and plays very well in single player but.. there's no excuse for the multiplayer mode's lower FPS rate. And the Koopalings/Pink Gold Peach aren't a good replacement for Dry Bones, Diddy Kong, Birdo and more deserving/recognizable/liked/distinguishable characters. It feels like they lost touch with most of the fanbse sometimes. MKWii was my favorite, though, it felt like the most full game in the series thus far.