Will it convince you if I shoot you tonight?
Not unless you have some variant that also moderator-confirms that the shot was you, was not a scum nightkill, and was not a scum-role ability.
Not a massive deal though, you're either what you say you are, or you're maf. Either way other people are being weird and illogical atm, so you aren't really on the scum read list today.
I mean no offense but honestly I doubt you're the person we should trust to sort out the mechanics of this game
So you do not believe Sabrar's vigilante claim yet they are not part of your hypothetical scum team?
Please help me to understand how this works then?
Vigilante is a common role osie just added a modifier (odd night in this case) to make the role less powerful (weaker).
Like I said to Sabrar, they're not behaving oddly, they're just not actually confirmed. There is no usual mechanical way to fully confirm them till the game is over, unless I have an investigative role in fact, which would only confirm it for me regardless.
don't hate logic's posting today
T
Triss
, do you have any reads that aren't purely mechanical on anyone in the game?
My list is actually not mechanical at all, it's based on incomplete or flat out incorrect logic, or seemingly deliberate ignoring of facts despite having had it pointed out before and subsequently never providing a reason why they are ignored.
We all thought Handorin was scum. Jack, however, had consistently argued from the point of view that Handorin was town:
The last two quotes are especially demonstrative of scum who knows Hando is going to flip town. In the last quote he is clearly already anticipating Hando flipping town. Even though he added the conditional, it obvious he was already thinking with a frame of mind that Hando was town and he was setting things up for today. Given that in the above quote, he agreed that lynching Hando was for the best and was ready for me to hammer Hando when I stated intent, him thinking it was a waste doesn't make sense.
So,
1. My two points on Jack are: he demonstrated an awareness that Handorin was going to flip town, and his push on me is disingenuous.
2. I think Jack is scum for these reasons, and therefore Fonti's vanilla result on Jack is the result of a tailor or Fonti being scum with Jack.
3. Shooting Jack will confirm that Fonti's results are unreliable or that I am severely wrong.
Now please show me where in this is the "bloody awful logic."
The game ends when nothing can prevent mafia majority.
Huh? Don't you only have one game of forum experience? Imaginary Friend is the only unique role so far. Bus Driver, Friendly Neighbor, Neapolitan, and Vig are all common. Regretful and X-Night are standard modifiers.
Disagree, it was always a distinct possibility that Handorin was a gamethrowing or
-playing a very odd strat- town, in fact the sheer amount of seeming to not care on Handorian's part, and the lack of even an attempt to paint them in a light of trying to pull something from anyone else and the subsequent wagon, practically guaranteed it.
I was just hoping it wasn't the case, because why the hell even play the game if you are just going to troll or give up immediately. All they had to do was ask for a sub out if they weren't enjoying themselves, they had other options and they chose this one.
Your awful logic was right before I voted you. It was a wall of text.
Game doesn't state that, despite other games doing so. Not convinced.
I am not allowed to talk about games in progress.
I have however played or watched a great deal more of other similar games, quite a bit carries over even if my initial strategy did not.
X-night isn't on the common role list last I checked, I do not believe that it's standard as a result.
