D
Deleted member
Guest
Well, they made up for it in Smash 4 so...Fun Fact: Brawl did not introduce any new female characters. ZSS, while a newcomer, was already in Smash as... Samus.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well, they made up for it in Smash 4 so...Fun Fact: Brawl did not introduce any new female characters. ZSS, while a newcomer, was already in Smash as... Samus.
I heard somewhere that Smash 4 introduce a lot of female characters and Ultimate introduced a lot of villains .Well, they made up for it in Smash 4 so...
At the end of the day, whether a character is fun or not depends on whoever's playing them. Which means, even if you think your character would be fun, it only matters if Sakurai sees them as fun.Regarding the whole "characters don't have to be recognizable to make it into Smash, as long as they're fun" statement, I feel like it can be twisted to apply to almost any character.
With a handful of exceptions, people are going to support characters because they want to play as those characters in Smash - of course they would figure that whatever character they support would be fun to play as.
Game Freak is in a tight position right now. I just hope they part ways with Nintendo, if they could.I really feel bad for Gamefreak and the stuff they are in right now. They really did bring this on themselves though, it was their decision to make these confusing changes to the game.
I go to a charter school, we primarly use computers for assignments and such.Wait, where the hell do you live that you don't have to go to school Friday's?
I don’t feel bad in the slightest. They have nobody but themselves to blame for putting little effort in making their games. We give EA and Activision flak when they screw up, why can’t we give Gamefreak the same treatment?I really feel bad for Gamefreak and the stuff they are in right now. They really did bring this on themselves though, it was their decision to make these confusing changes to the game.
I know what point Sakurai was trying to get across, but he never said being recognizable wasn't important. There's gonna be times when a less unique character gets in before someone better. Main characters will always be priority, regardless of how unique their partners may be, and some characters may get in just because they're extremely iconic to Nintendo.Regarding the whole "characters don't have to be recognizable to make it into Smash, as long as they're fun" statement, I feel like it can be twisted to apply to almost any character.
With a handful of exceptions, people are going to support characters because they want to play as those characters in Smash - of course they would figure that whatever character they support would be fun to play as.
Most definitely. Banjo Kazooie mains are living a dream, while Terry mains are people who are quite deep into the FGC or SNK supporters.With a handful of exceptions, people are going to support characters because they want to play as those characters in Smash - of course they would figure that whatever character they support would be fun to play as.
"Here's why x is more fun than y" is a scary prospect going forward in speculationRegarding the whole "characters don't have to be recognizable to make it into Smash, as long as they're fun" statement, I feel like it can be twisted to apply to almost any character.
With a handful of exceptions, people are going to support characters because they want to play as those characters in Smash - of course they would figure that whatever character they support would be fun to play as.
Definitely. Even coming from people who support swordie type characters. They'll brag about why their swordsmanship is more interesting than the others'"Here's why x is more fun than y" is a scary prospect going forward in speculation
Great idea. Then maybe Nintendo could out source the property to a dev studio that actually gives a crap about making a quality game.Game Freak is in a tight position right now. I just hope they part ways with Nintendo, if they could.
I posted this on Reddit and everyone recommended that Nintendo should take the helm while Game Freak should act as consultants instead.Great idea. Then maybe Nintendo could out source the property to a dev studio that actually gives a crap about makig a quality game.
Wanting a character for their diversity and wanting a character cuz you like their game are both examples of resonating with the characters in questionMy most wanted has nothing to do with gender or diversity, or filling that type of quota, but everything to do with the games I enjoy playing, and seeing them with the likes of Mario, Link, Sonic, ect.
Not saying I disagree with you, but relating with a character is an odd criteria to have to like the character, no?Most definitely. Banjo Kazooie mains are living a dream, while Terry mains are people who are quite deep into the FGC or SNK supporters.
I for one want females as part of representation. That is why I'm preaching my "FP5 must be female". Because I want a new female character I can play as, and one I can relate with.
That's not going to change how TPC pushes frankly ridiculous deadlines.I posted this on Reddit and everyone recommended that Nintendo should take the helm while Game Freak should act as consultants instead.
Well, wanting a character in because you like there games is one thing. It shows that you enjoy how they play, among other things(or just want the internet to explode, cough Buddyfight cough)Wanting a character to fill a quota, and wanting a character cuz you like their game are both examples of resonating with the character in question
Not sure why one is considered completely acceptable and the other isn't.
Quota, quota, quota. Is there anything else that isn't this quality that drops a female character's inclusion?Wanting a character to fill a quota, and wanting a character cuz you like their game are both examples of resonating with the character in question
Not sure why one is considered completely acceptable and the other isn't.
If I ever support female characters, I'd lesrn more about them. That is how I pick the females I support, if they're interesting to play as well.Well, wanting a character in because you like there games is one thing. It shows that you enjoy how they play, among other things(or just want the internet to explode, cough Buddyfight cough)
Wanting a character in just for their gender feels like you only want to "fill a quota" but don't actually care about the quality of em.
That's how I see it, anyway.
....Ok no. You're basically suggesting all the online harassment and irritating spamming on Twitter was completely justified? Even with that one time someone impersonated as a Game Freak employee to claim fake allegations just to get him fired?I don’t feel bad in the slightest. They have nobody but themselves to blame for putting little effort in making their games. We give EA and Activision flak when they screw up, why can’t we give Gamefreak the same treatment?
Ammy best wolfI really want Amaterasu.
I ageee. I just hope the best for them.I really feel bad for Gamefreak and the stuff they are in right now. They really did bring this on themselves though, it was their decision to make these confusing changes to the game.
you're missing the pointWell, wanting a character in because you like there games is one thing. It shows that you enjoy how they play, among other things(or just want the internet to explode, cough Buddyfight cough)
Wanting a character in just for there gender feels like you only want to "fill a quota" but don't actually care about the quality of em.
Wrong wording on my part, my apologiesQuota, quota, quota. Is there anything else that isn't this quality that drops a female character's inclusion?
That's fair. If the fifth fighters pass character was a woman, I'm not sure who to expect - I'm not sure if there would be a second Square-Enix character in the fighters pass, which would rule out 2B or Lara Croft.Most definitely. Banjo Kazooie mains are living a dream, while Terry mains are people who are quite deep into the FGC or SNK supporters.
I for one want females as part of representation. That is why I'm preaching my "FP5 must be female". Because I want a new female character I can play as, and one I can relate with.
To quote a seminar I took on female portrayal in media:you're missing the point
when you want a character cuz you liked their game, that means you've got a connection with them
And when people want a character for their diversity, it's usually because they identify with them, whether it be their race, gender, orienation, etc. Once again, they technically still got a connection with them
Wrong wording on my part, my apologies
Ace Attorney TrilogyHey guys.
Need recommendations for a good game that's $30 and below on the Switch.
Fire away.
Pfft. I went to a charter school for ten years and their technology was the worst. I don't even remember using computers for anything more than like once or twice.I go to a charter school, we primarly use computers for assignments and such.
well then you are doing a good job. There some people that just want a black character in a gane just so they can say -blank- has a black character but noelt because the character is good. Its good to at least learn about that the girl can do. Though it would suck if said gurl sucked butt in smash pffIf I ever support female characters, I'd lesrn more about them. That is how I pick the females I support, if they're interesting to play as well.
Already played AA and Okami and DS is $40.Ace Attorney Trilogy
Dark Souls Remastered
Okami HD
Pretty good, just working on getting more spirits before I have to start school.Hola, how's it going everyone?
I just had chocolate chip pancakes for breakfast and they were wonderful.
Xenoblade was too late to make the first fighter's pass. I feel like they didn't decide on whether to do a second pass or not until they saw the reception for Plant & Joker. Because it was mostly positive (along with fairly positive buzz for Hero when rumors of him were circulating) they then made the decision to go ahead and make plans for a "2nd wave".That's fair. If the fifth fighters pass character was a woman, I'm not sure who to expect - I'm not sure if there would be a second Square-Enix character in the fighters pass, which would rule out 2B or Lara Croft.
There's Edelgard - I know that people have soured on Fire Emblem characters, but I feel like the roster's expanded enough to make up for it - but if Xenoblade Chronicles 2 was too late to make it into the Fighters Pass, then Three Houses is definitely too late. (I could see her being post-Fighters Pass DLC, though) I'd like to see Elma from Xenoblade Chronicles X, but that game seems to have died with the Wii U.
Maybe KOS-MOS or Jill Valentine? Not familiar with Xenosaga, and I haven't played much of the classic Resident Evil games (the controls and camera killed it for me), but they seem fairly prominent, and KOS-MOS got a cameo in a first party Nintendo game. Amaterasu from Okami might be an option, even if she's not visibly a woman.
I don’t know. From a creative standpoint it’s possible to start from a place of “I want this minority in my game” and then develop it into a good deep and interesting character. It all depends on if the devs wanna put in the effort.well then you are doing a good job. There some people that just want a black character in a gane just so they can say -blank- has a black character but noelt because the character is good. Its good to at least learn about that the girl can do. Though it would suck if said gurl sucked butt in smash pff
I'm just here. Idk.Hola, how's it going everyone?
I just had chocolate chip pancakes for breakfast and they were wonderful.
I never once said that online harassment is ok. I reeeaaallly don’t appreciate words being put in my mouth.....Ok no. You're basically suggesting all the online harassment and irritating spamming on Twitter was completely justified? Even with that one time someone impersonated as a Game Freak employee to claim fake allegations just to get him fired?
Sorry, but that's just sick.
Maybe we should just put the rest of the cut Pokemon in lootboxes for SwSh.I never once said that online harassment is ok. I reeeaaallly don’t appreciate words being put in my mouth.
But still, regarding what you said, you are dissmissing a majority of consumer backlash as “online harassment”? Do you understand how potentially dangerous that mentality is?
They are not giving it to us for free. We are paying consumers for their product, and we have every right to let a company know if we are dissatisfied with their product, and sometimes, they might listen.
Imagine if no one spoke up about the lootboxes in Battlefront II. We have every right to be disappointed/disatisfied with a product that we are paying for.
I mean, there are many ways for my most wanteds to work. KOS-MOS has a crapton of weapons to choose from. Morrigan can let Darkness Illusion be normal move like how they made Terry's supers normal competitive moves.well then you are doing a good job. There some people that just want a black character in a gane just so they can say -blank- has a black character but noelt because the character is good. Its good to at least learn about that the girl can do. Though it would suck if said gurl sucked butt in smash pff
But he wouldn't leave said minority out...I don’t know. From a creative standpoint it’s possible to start from a place of “I want this minority in my game” and then develop it into a good deep and interesting character. It all depends on if the devs wanna put in the effort.
It works a tad different for Smash since Sakurai is basically dependent on the rest of the industry creating these characters for him though.
You say this ironically, but at this point, I wouldn’t even put it past them to do that.Maybe we should just put the rest of the cut Pokemon in lootboxes for SwSh.