Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I hope you're not referring to brawl, as he was a moderately heavy / fast falling character in it. His Up-B and Tether aren't the great either...
What even? Link was by no means floaty (at least by Bwarl's standards) and his recovery was complete and utter trash.
This is a good thing
You idiot, this is similar to Melee, where tethers grab the stage sides.
lmao
I don't think so. =P
Same here.
You're probably thinking of Toon Link. =P
Correlation does not imply causation.
The fact that Sakurai assumes that most competitive players love Final Destination and only play on that while making seemingly featureless FD clone stages seems too perfect of a timing that matches PM's altered stages(I've no clue why he didn't add platforms). I can't ignore that.
Looks like just the background.
It's not that difficult to see that Final Destination is picked a lot on Wi-Fi. If he was copying off PM, he would have allowed Battlefield on For Glory Mode or even allowed some stages to have a Battlefield version...or just have hazards optional (turned off during For Glory) and make large stages smaller during For Glory. Honestly, there will be changes within each iteration that will somewhat change gameplay. Some of these changes will be to address issues from previous games. It wouldn't be surprising to have similar changes to a mod made by the fanbase. Even if he knew of PM's existence, we would never know since he would legally not be allowed to talk about it anyways.
Nah, this is just for recovery
I wasn't really complaining about the lack of platforms...just saying there would be some if he was copying from Project M. I don't really mind the lack of platforms.
Actually, in a gameplay clip from the Direct you can see him going considerably higher than in Brawl. It looked like Toon Link-distance
Two words: port priority. That's how "same-frame" ties have been resolved in past entries of Smash, generally. The only questions are who gets the short end of the stick, and whether it means death for them.
its still nintendos intelectual property and coding projectm uses, it still uses the brawl engine or an engine owned by nintendo so nintendo can legally do this and if they wanted to , have every right to sue and shut down projectM so they can copy it if they want to and you nutbags cant do anything about it or attack them for it, because they can just turn around and seize all copies of projectM, and sue the PMBR and it was either they copy projectM, or just say **** the competitive players, give full attention to the casuals, BE happy they at least acknowledged us and are putting effort and trying to care, because they could have just as easily made it unbalanced, items on always online, taken away final desty and battlefield, and keep the current fully illegal stage roster, this is why I hate the competitive communities, and the one-sided nintendo fanboys they constantly ***** about who is exclusively catered to and HOW and because competitives are soo DAMN picky on how they play, and what they play on, nintendo does not really have any unique options that wont make players shout #BANNED stage, BANNED character for the whole game or 99% of the game heck they did NOT have to have a for glory mode online they could have just put a for fun mode, erm exscuse me.. CASUAL mode where its always items on
projectM is not nintendo's physics code
Except tethers were also in Brawl, so he was obviously talking about the new length and shared edges attribute of the tethers. You know, the only TWO NEW THINGS in this screenshot that were exclusive to Project M thus far.
Now we wait for turbo mode!
