Uhh.. I've come across the strangest Fan-Made roster i've ever seen, with some pretty wild and obscure characters. This is from before Brawl.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080520...nline.com/CharacterPages/characterselect.html
It's intriguing to see what this site got right, despite those right picks being ridiculous back when it was made. The site also has some Stages, an Adventure mode and other things. It's pretty fun to look through. Anything on here you think has shot in a future Smash Game?
That list takes me back to the days of Golden Sun and Custom Robo... *sighs*
The 6th gen was really great for most Nintendo franchises (that existed at that time).
Sorry if I'm going to change the subject on this matters, but I'm curious about people's opinions here. How many characters do you think we would get? And Who do you think that would have a greater chance to become playable character?
I know there is a poll but I would rather to read people's thoughts on that matters, rather than depend on the numbers.
My old guess was at four, but I have to admit the amiibos have me thrown. I believe they indicate something has shifted in the pipeline, but as to what, for now I can only speculate. And this will be fairly boring, but the only characters I feel have a particularly strong chance are ICs and Inklings.
As to other possibilities... Wolf, a seventh gen Pokemon, Bomberman, Rayman, a character from the ballot (K. Rool or someone), even Snake... these are all possibilities... but imo little more than that. I don't believe we'll get an ARMS character yet. But trying to predict characters is usually a futile process. We get a few right and are way off on many... and I don't see a port being any different. Lord knows the DLC wan't.
And this is all under the assumption you're referring to the port. A full sequel is an entirely different game. Pun unintended.
Having a few extra Mario's used to be a common thing back then. Before Melee, Metal Mario was always a big request, after Melee, Paper Mario and Shadow Mario were big (though technically neither are THE Mario), Tanooki Mario only got big again after the Tanooki suit returned (so I wanna say 3D Land?), but I've never seen this many all in one place.
Thissssss doesn't match anything I remember. Apart from Paper Mario. And Shadow Mario if and only if you're speaking in the context of being part of a transformation gimmick with Bowser Jr.
People have never really suggested for more Marios, apart from Paper... and occasionally (but rarely) Baby (usually paired with Baby Luigi). It's happens, but not with a frequency enough to be notable. The only Marios people usually asked for were ones who had their own sub-series like Paper and Doc.
Changed the poll since we're getting so close to E3
Simple and clean, will smash show up at all at E3?
I'll be disappointed but not surprised if it's a no-show. I'm 50/50 on it. I do think the port exists in some state though. However I've stopped believing we'll receive it this year.
Generally ports exist because they're low in effort and cost to make, but high in profit. Sakurai has said in the past that it takes an immense amount of work to create and balance even one character. Considering a port would need characters to sell well, that's why I think they'd put a minimum number of additions. Put in too many and the port costs too much to make, defeating the purpose of a port in the first place.
tl;dr: Ports are made for easy money. Making tons of characters costs a lot of money and time, making it basically impossible for a port.
For what it's worth, I agree in that I think the additions will be limited. BUT. They made seven characters as DLC. With a limited team. And lord knows they probably paid a lot for at least two of those characters. And they only advertised them in Directs. And they still made a lot of money. If they show Smash at E3, with new characters, and they continue promoting the port as they promoted MK8D, or even to a lesser extent, I can't imagine the profit wouldn't outweigh the cost. It would be very surprising if a port with new content made less than the DLC. Look at MK8D.
And again, I don't think they will add a bunch of new characters. But the reason isn't because the costs would outweigh the benefits. It's because they would receive similar benefits with half that number of new characters. There is a great gap in the number of people who would buy a straight port vs. a port with four newcomers, but the gap between that latter category and those who would buy it with eight newcomers is much smaller. And at
that point, that's when the costs are superfluous.
Nintendo wouldn't pull that ****. They're a much better company than Capcom, despite some boneheaded decisions, Nintendo actually cares about the consumers. A Smash 4 port wouldn't be a bare-bones POS that makes you rebuy DLC.
Nintendo cares about retaining the value of their IP more than anything else, which is a little different than caring about the consumer. In some situations that mentality benefits the consumer, in others it doesn't.
Also definitive editions are obviously things they would do if under the right circumstances. Like having highly lucrative software being hindered by a mismanaged flop of a console. Hence MK8D. Or simply because it could sell. Remember every third version of Pokemon? (blah blah blah blah Game Freak... who do you think bankrolls those games?). So obviously that could extend to Smash. It probably will. How you want to define "definitive edition" is up to you, but it's the same game, just with a handful of additional content.