Double0Groove
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2015
- Messages
- 667
In the roster that isoh they'll get there sora allright![]()
![Troll :troll: :troll:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/troll.png)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
In the roster that isoh they'll get there sora allright![]()
Sora isn't owned by Sony, but rather by Square Enix (and Disney). Square Enix having a 3rd party character in SSB4 actually isn't that far-fetched. Square Enix used to make only games for Nintendo, see examples such as Final Fantasy 1-6, Chrono Trigger and The Secret of Mana. They're still on good terms with Nintendo, giving them Bravely Default and The World Ends With You. Sora would be one of the least likely Square Enix IPs to get into SSB4. There's much more likely characters, such as someone from the Final Fantasy games.Sora does not belong in this game I love SSB but people really need to stop trying to steal Sony characters, the main games of the series came out on Playstation, they already stole Snake because of one GC game this is getting out of hand with these cameos and requests.
I don't know what kind of universe you came from but in this Universe, Sora isn't owned by Sony, and therefore, is not a Sony character.Sora does not belong in this game I love SSB but people really need to stop trying to steal Sony characters, the main games of the series came out on Playstation, they already stole Snake because of one GC game this is getting out of hand with these cameos and requests.
He's not buuut he is owned by disney and Square enix soo even if he's not own by sony requiring rights to use sora in smash won't be easyI don't know what kind of universe you came from but in this Universe, Sora isn't owned by Sony, and therefore, is not a Sony character.
He's actually only owned by Disney.He's not buuut he is owned by disney and Square enix soo even if he's not own by sony requiring rights to use sora in smash won't be easy
well there ya goHe's actually only owned by Disney.
But first you must defeat Sheng Long to stand a chance.Forgot to mention if you get 25 k.o. In cruel smash in under 15 minutes, you'll unlock king k. Rool
And you can only battle him after clearing the third street saints multi-man-smash challenge.But first you must defeat Sheng Long to stand a chance.
Yes I know I was just pointing that out, no one really cares about the gcn mgs either. I just wanted to put that out thereBe that as it may no one really cares about those games or even know they exist he's not really a Nintendo staple who is widley recognized as such, the MGS series on the PlayStation is what made him big. these days they are just reaching for anything remotely related to Nintendo to add to this game.
That's your opinion and I'll respect it, but I heavily disagree with your point of view.Yea but Sora also isn't a Nintendo character either, like I said they are reaching for characters at this point instead of Nintendo staples (hence the addition of ryu), but instead of adding Sora or Snake they should add something like the Inking from Splatoon.
Lol, Link isn't DLC. Also, it's costumes for Miis, not Amiibo.For all the people saying amiibo costumes deconfirm dlc, explain link.
Y'know, you would've been better off just using Meta knight as an example.For all the people saying amiibo costumes deconfirm dlc, explain link.
Final Fantasy left Nintendo and has only given offerings with the words "Crystal Chronicles."Sora isn't owned by Sony, but rather by Square Enix (and Disney). Square Enix having a 3rd party character in SSB4 actually isn't that far-fetched. Square Enix used to make only games for Nintendo, see examples such as Final Fantasy 1-6, Chrono Trigger and The Secret of Mana. They're still on good terms with Nintendo, giving them Bravely Default and The World Ends With You. Sora would be one of the least likely Square Enix IPs to get into SSB4. There's much more likely characters, such as someone from the Final Fantasy games.
Also, I don't know what you mean by "they already stole Snake". Snake was not an "original character do not steal" that Nintendo took without permission. They partnered up with Konami, the company that owns Metal Gear Solid, which was derived from an NES game. You shouldn't assume that MGS has only had one Nintendo game previously. You'd find how painfully mistaken you are if you just looked things up a bit.
Requesting characters like Steve from Minecraft is unreasonable because Mojang and Nintendo have no itty bitty bit of friendship between them. Nintendo gets the final say on who gets put in SSB4, should they get permission from the content owners. It's simply that Nintendo will be putting in 3rd party characters from friendly companies, such as Namco, Sega, Capcom, Square Enix, Sony and formerly Konami.
Go hack your copy of Brawl, get a Brawl EX pack, you'll have Lloyd.As much as I'm psyched to see Lyold Irving included as a costume but I really wanted him as a playable character. His moveset fits perfectly for Smash.
Re: Coded was ported from a phone game. Birth by Sleep is the only psp game that exists.Kingdom Hearts 1 (Sony), Chain of Memories (Game Boy Advance, reproduced on Sony in 1.5 remix), Kingdom Hearts 2 (Sony), Re:Coded (PSP, reproduced on DS), 358/2 Days (DS), Kingdom Hearts: Dream Drop Distance (3DS)
You forgot to put Sora in there.