Whoever PMs a host with criticism of their game design clearly must believe that their own ability to design a game is greater. Whoever would do such a thing has a large ego. But it has to be more than just an ego, because the ego alone would only suggest the opinion. To actually send the message to the host criticizing their game suggest more, a bitterness at their current state and the way things are going for them, clearly contradicting their ego driven narrative. We can rule out the NZoners, who's habits suggest a fondness for role madness, and a willingness to accept an unbalanced game. The very way they play suggests a lack of strong salt. Ruling them out, that leaves only the Dgamers. The culprit must be amongst them.
Our first suspect can be Bardull, who did criticize his role, and his early death would result in bitterness. However, he has yet to show a strong ego, and has shown a care free attitude. A cover? Unlikely. as he is already dead and never got to use his role, any bitterness would not be directed towards the role itself, but towards the players. Plus, with his new moderator powers, it is unrealistic that Bardull would do something so risky to damper any respect he could gain. He does not match.
Maven? Maven has a habit of salt, but is also the coolest ************ on the planet and would never do such a thing. He does not match, either. These are the obvious suspects based on what has occured. We must design a series of tests to narrow down the list of suspects.
We need to do is ask ourselves, who here has shown an ego beyond reproach? Who has shown a willingness to criticize all others for the way they behave? Who has shown bitterness at the game, and specifically the balance of the game? Who is a Dgamer?
The first question rules out Nabe and Dark Horse. The third removes Kary. This makes the answer obvious.
There is only one suspect that matches all criteria, who has a habit of ego driven outbursts.