The Stoopid Unikorn
Spiciest of Guacamoles
Because it's a stupidly risky move to take when we don't know anything.Why not?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Because it's a stupidly risky move to take when we don't know anything.Why not?
We lynch errybody in a tie.Why not?
Then you must make a decision, because votes are piling on. Aren't you already voting for me anyway?Because it's a stupidly risky move to take when we don't know anything.
This makes things even more fun, then. I do not think Town will allow a tie to occur, but we'll see what happens.We lynch errybody in a tie.
That triple lynch thoOr we did last game, at least. It was supposed to deter tied lynches but all it did was encourage them, lol.
I did it to joke because you said it'd make you happyThen you must make a decision, because votes are piling on. Aren't you already voting for me anyway?
Never underestimate how dumb us NZers can be as townies.I do not think Town will allow a tie to occur
Yeah. The civil war was last game's theme :VAll right, lets not have a civil war between DG and NZ.
Lets all be friends.
Considering DG performance last game, I think they're pretty dumb too.
you say that but we really don't rely on such, or at least your really overestimating how much we actually doThis has actually been a really fun game with lots of great dialogue. I'm just sad more votes haven't been thrown out. Heck, I would be happy if people just piled votes on me at this point to get the game moving somewhere.
I think the biggest weakness in gameplay thus far has been a reluctance to vote in the absence of mechanical leads (i.e. cop claims, tracker claims, counter claims...). If you want to find the bad guys though especially in late game, forming connections on D1 is important.
Which question was that? I only remember the question you asked to Natz regarding japanese anime faces.
As an aside, any players you find to be suspicious or perhaps exhibiting towniness?
pretty much lolI enjoyed all the Dgamers last game ripping on us for abusing a mechanic we don't even use.
ergo, villains mafiaBecause it's a stupidly risky move to take when we don't know anything.
Then. Vote.you say that but we really don't rely on such, or at least your really overestimating how much we actually do
pretty much lol
ergo, villains mafia
thats pure proof right there
Then. Vote.
passI want to see authentic scum hunting. I want to see people actually trying to figure out who the scum are in the absence of mechanical leads.
You say I overestimate your reliance on them, prove me wrong.
Find scum.
but no one's done anything :^(I want to see authentic scum hunting. I want to see people actually trying to figure out who the scum are in the absence of mechanical leads.
You say I overestimate your reliance on them, prove me wrong.
Find scum.
You called for your own lynch, maybe not in so many words, but the meaning was there. And when people actually took you up on the offer you instead asked to be tied with Maven. You weren't aware that we kill all tied lynches, so that was you asking for it to be a RNG coin flip who would be lynched. In the absence of mechanical leads, role claims or flavor claims, voting history is the only thing we have to go on and all you've accomplished is messing with the vote and then asking for us to mess with it further.I want to see authentic scum hunting. I want to see people actually trying to figure out who the scum are in the absence of mechanical leads.
You say I overestimate your reliance on them, prove me wrong.
Find scum.
Did not ask for a tie. Forcing a lynch between me and Maven means, in colloquial DGames terms, that only one of us will be lynched.You called for your own lynch, maybe not in so many words, but the meaning was there. And when people actually took you up on the offer you instead asked to be tied with Maven. You weren't aware that we kill all tied lynches, so that was you asking for it to be a RNG coin flip who would be lynched. In the absence of mechanical leads, role claims or flavor claims, voting history is the only thing we have to go on and all you've accomplished is messing with the vote and then asking for us to mess with it further.
That's what I was saying. You asked for a tied vote, ergo, a coin flip between you and Maven on who dies.Did not ask for a tie. Forcing a lynch between me and Maven means, in colloquial DGames terms, that only one of us will be lynched.
Okay, nevermind, I think I get what you were trying to say. I think you wanted us all to vote for either you or Maven, not intentionally give you both the same number of votes?Did not ask for a tie. Forcing a lynch between me and Maven means, in colloquial DGames terms, that only one of us will be lynched.
That'sa been there the whole time, pay it no mind.I just noticed the mustache in vaan's avatar and now I can't unsee it
This is how I interpreted it.Okay, nevermind, I think I get what you were trying to say. I think you wanted us all to vote for either you or Maven, not intentionally give you both the same number of votes?
Welcome to NintenZone gamesAnd holy **** 16 pages in one RL day? Most of it ****posting?
Yes, it gets confusing because we generally don't have tied RNG mechanics in our games. That's why I was caught by surprise in the last game; should've read the rules better.Okay, nevermind, I think I get what you were trying to say. I think you wanted us all to vote for either you or Maven, not intentionally give you both the same number of votes?
Bardull, you have 3 shots, who do you kill?
No **** posts from me until we get more votes.
thats ****ign stupid :VFor every vote that is place from a unique poster from this post onward, I will make a **** post.
Compromise!