Zink Imp
Smash Ace
I would not like to see this. I don't have anything against Shovel Knight, but I wouldn't want to see him.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I think you missed the point. Mostly everyone here knows the picture is the Snashified Shovel Knight, not the official SSB4 artwork. I don't know why you keep on trying to convince us it's Smashified when we already know that fact.
Well then.In response to the mass of "not iconic enough" posts all I have to say is this: If Shovel Knight was voted in via massive vote surge in the ballot then you are simply wrong. That level of popularity is the only significance of whether or not he's "Iconic" which, mind you, has nothing to do with how OLD something is. Shovel Knight could be so instantly Iconic that he'll be the first indie character to bust his way into smash. Either way, if this is announced he IS certified iconic due to the votes being proof, and if he isn't then you are correct and he wasn't iconic enough! ONLY time will tell.
And in regards to "the ballot hasn't closed yet": they have not explicitly stated that they wouldn't be putting any new characters out using the ballot before it closes. I'm sure they got right to work on some of the very high voted characters right away.
Full disclosure: I expect King K. Rool and Shovel Knight to be coming along at some point AND they are the two characters I voted for. I'm very optimistic.
Enlightenment:Well then.
Please tell me that Shovel Knight is on the same level as these five.
Enlighten me.
![]()
Wasn't this rumor already debunked?
I think you're relying on the Spanish retailer who listed a Shovel Knight amiibo on their site. It was thought to be a mistake as indicated by Yacht Club Games, the developer behind Shovel Knight, who stated as much, claiming this to be untrue and Shovel Knight's inclusion in Smash to just be a rumor.Yeah
Shulk isn't a third-party character. Nintendo owns Xenoblade Chronicles and absorbed its developer, MonolithSoft, years ago.Enlightenment:![]()
You might want to put that in spoilers.Enlightenment:![]()
Shulk is a Nintendo character among a cast that has always included obscure Nintendo character. Shovel Knight is a third-party character when ever single third-party character we got was legitimately iconic and popular among a wider gaming audience and Sakurai explicitly stated that any third-party character is a special occassion and Shovel Knight does not fit that qualificationEnlightenment:![]()
As for the characters we got as third-party characters?When I asked about the volume of third party characters present in the new Smash Bros. game, Sakurai noted that Mega Man himself was a very special arrangement - that bringing in non-Nintendo characters can be quite the challenge. "Adding third-party characters should be considered a very special case. In the last game, when we added Sonic and Snake, there were lots of different hoops to jump through as far as getting approvals and making sure all the parties involved were happy with the way things went. You can consider it a very special circumstance for that to happen," Sakurai said. "Even in cases like adding Pokemon characters, there are a lot of parties involved and there’s a lot of wrangling. It’s much tougher than people can imagine. I know lots of people have requests and their own ideas about third-party characters that would work, but I want people to understand that adding a third-party character like Mega Man is a very special situation."
I'm a huge Sonic fan and even I had to laugh out loud at that one. LOLHe isn't dead.
AYYYYYYYY CAN I GET A RIMSHOT
Again, you're comparing a third-party character to a Nintendo character, despite third-party characters having a much stricter criteria than Nintendo characters.To anyone saying Shovel Knight came out last year, so he's to recent to get in.
Greninja wasn't even in Pokemon before he appeared in Smash. When Sakurai was making the roster, The Pokemon Company sent him pics, and rough explanations. Sakurai made up his moveset and put it in Smash. Mind you this was during 2012.
Well then.
Please tell me that Shovel Knight is on the same level as these five.
Enlighten me.
![]()
Sales don't necessarily reflect a character's legacy, and Sakurai has never said anything to suggest that. In fact this is reflected in inclusions such as Ice Climbers, R.O.B., and Shulk, as you specifically mentiond. Obscurity isn't as prevalent as a factor as some people claim. Little Mac was primarily recognized in the western territories and was considered very obscure in Japan. Sonic himself has seen a dwindling decline in popularity in Japan, but returned regardless. As for Shovel Knight being a potential third-part representative from a lesser known developer, I actually believe this works in his favor. I would imagine there'd be a lot less "hoops" to jump through with Yackt Club Games given their small status in comparision to Sega, Capcom, Namco Bandai, and Konami. Considering the fact that Yacht Club has been very vocal about wanting Shovel Knight in Smash in the first place and in being Nintendo fans themselves, I would think negociations would be easier. It might even be an easier exchange in comparision to including the Pokemon characters.Shulk is a Nintendo character among a cast that has always included obscure Nintendo character. Shovel Knight is a third-party character when ever single third-party character we got was legitimately iconic and popular among a wider gaming audience and Sakurai explicitly stated that any third-party character is a special occassion and Shovel Knight does not fit that qualification
As for the characters we got as third-party characters?
?-This and his franchise selling around 150 million copies along with how important he was to Nintendo history precisely because of the Sega-Nintendo rivalry pretty much says it all. Plus, he was the most heavily requested character for Brawl by far.
?-He's the face of the franchise that helped popularise the stealth genre in the first place and his franchise has sold around 41 million copies.
? His franchise has sold around 30 million copies and Classic Mega Man has a much bigger history with Nintendo than Shovel Knight, considering how many exclusive games he had on Nintendo consoles. Also, he was the most heavily requested newcomer character for Smash 4.
?- An arcade legend and the most famous video game character of them all
?Like MegaMan, his franchise also sold over 30 million copies and his franchise is pretty much the franchise that popularized fighting games. Him and several other SF2 characters are referenced in pop culture to this day
Shovel Knight? a one-shot character from a game that didn't even sell one million copies.
a critically celebrated game (which is more than can be said about the latest installments of Mega Man, Pac-Man, Sonic the Hedgehog and Metal Gear Solid). /quote]
I can understand the first three, but.....
Metal Gear? Seriously?
![]()
The Phantom Pain has been getting 10s across the board ever since the embargo went up.
I must agree with this post--which is why I don't have high hopes for Sora or Gunvolt, even if they would be unique as a fighter. If Shovel Knight were 100% Nintendo, then I could see him getting away with being added. In mine opinion, the most we can--and should--expect is a trophy.Considering Sakurai explicitly stated that he won't just add any third-party characters, along with the fact that every single third-party character we got was legitimately iconic to a wider gaming audience, I don't believe this rumour for a moment considering Shovel Knight is the definition of "just any third-party character"
Shulk is a Nintendo character among a cast that has always included obscure Nintendo character. Shovel Knight is a third-party character when ever single third-party character we got was legitimately iconic and popular among a wider gaming audience and Sakurai explicitly stated that any third-party character is a special occassion and Shovel Knight does not fit that qualification
As for the characters we got as third-party characters?
?-This and his franchise selling around 150 million copies along with how important he was to Nintendo history precisely because of the Sega-Nintendo rivalry pretty much says it all. Plus, he was the most heavily requested character for Brawl by far.
?-He's the face of the franchise that helped popularise the stealth genre in the first place and his franchise has sold around 41 million copies.
? His franchise has sold around 30 million copies and Classic Mega Man has a much bigger history with Nintendo than Shovel Knight, considering how many exclusive games he had on Nintendo consoles. Also, he was the most heavily requested newcomer character for Smash 4.
?- An arcade legend and the most famous video game character of them all
?Like MegaMan, his franchise also sold over 30 million copies and his franchise is pretty much the franchise that popularized fighting games. Him and several other SF2 characters are referenced in pop culture to this day
Shovel Knight? a one-shot character from a game that didn't even sell one million copies.
If I recall, not too many people were pleased to see that Konami "split" Metal Gear Solid V into two different installments, being Ground Zeroes and Phantom Pains. Given that both titles did well (in Phantom Pains case, very well) this "hiccup" can be excused, however during Phantom Pains' development it became quite apparent of the internal struggles facing Konami as it moves into the more profitable mobile game-based industry and in dismissing Hideo Kojima, who is essentially the Shigeru Miyamoto of Konami, from the company. I think the future of the Metal Gear Solid series is uncertain at best, despite Phantom Pains being a critically well-received title. Than again, it would be the least sinful game on a shelf containg Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures 2 and Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric, I grant you that.I can understand the first three, but.....
Metal Gear? Seriously?
The Phantom Pain has been getting 10s across the board ever since the embargo went up.![]()
Ok.If I recall, not too many people were pleased to see that Konami "split" Metal Gear Solid V into two different installments, being Ground Zeroes and Phantom Pains. Given that both titles did well (in Phantom Pains case, very well) this "hiccup" can be excused, however during Phantom Pains' development it became quite apparent of the internal struggles facing Konami as it moves into the more profitable mobile game-based industry and in dismissing Hideo Kojima, who is essentially the Shigeru Miyamoto of Konami, from the company. I think the future of the Metal Gear Solid series is uncertain at best, despite Phantom Pains being a critically well-received title. Than again, it would be the least sinful game on a shelf containg Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures 2 and Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric, I grant you that.
Because Shantae deserves it more? I dont understand the blind hatred towards Shantae. She deserves this spot much, much more than Shovel Knight.At least it isn't Shantae (no offence fans)
Personally, I don't like shante. but I'm not a big fan of shovel knight either. If i chose, it would be him over her.Because Shantae deserves it more? I dont understand the blind hatred towards Shantae. She deserves this spot much, much more than Shovel Knight.