• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Religious History, 9-11, and Government Conspiracy

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stroupes

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 2, 2008
Messages
1,810
Location
Tennessee
If you've ever seen the documentary 'Zeitgeist,' you'll know that it mentions some pretty controversial topics, such as the history of the Holy Bible, the whole point of what happened around the 9-11 attacks, and some government conspiracy theories, and/or what the government is conducting without our knowledge.

I'll tackle these topics in order, starting with the history of the Bible, however, I won't go into to too much detail, because there's already a thread disputing the existance of God, found here.
I'll instead be focusing on Jesus.

To first begin, for those who do not know what "Zeitgeist" is, look it up. I'm pretty sure it's free to watch somewhere. If not, PM me, and I'll search it for you.
Anyway, Zeitgeist is a documentary, discussing such things as historical theories of the biblical age, primarily Jesus, the background of what really happened , or didn't happen during 9-11, and what goes on with the government.

In Zeitgeist, there is mention of numerous figures that contradict or mimic Jesus.
Many other religons, such as Egyptians and Greeks, also had saviors that were, coincedentally or not, dittos of Jesus. These religions, according to Zeitgeist, have saviors with the characteristics of Jesus: Virgin birth, rising from the dead, the fact that the savior's arrival was fortold of by the star of the east, and was adored by three kings, etc.
One cannot begin to debate the credibility of these "facts," however, because history is history. Especially biblical history.


Moving on to more important matters, the biggest slap-in-the-face to America(if this happens to be true), was most likely the secret behind 9-11.
If Zeitgeist truly had reliable sources(this fact was also backed up by a few teachers of mine), the fact of the matter is, we could have prevented 9-11. Not only couldn't we have prevented it, but our government was encouraging it.
In this situation, government rules by fear of the people. And when people fear in situations like this, they look to their government.
My proof for this statement, is this: there are many departments in the government, IRS, FBI, so on. The problem is, according to some Constitutional standards, or other official doctrines, these departments are not allowed to discuss certain matters, and are instead supposed to keep information within each department.
The problem here, is that a certain department not only had knowledge about 9-11, but were funding secret Iraqi piloting programs. Of course, their intentions weren't to destroy the Trade towers, but the Iraqis thought different, supposedly.

The government was trying to justify going to war with Afghanistan and Iraq to make more money for the people in power. The government really isn't intent on making the public happy. It's purpose is to make money, to repay the nation's debt. Which brings me to my next point.


The U.S. mint makes the money we use in America. According to Zeitgeist, however, the money isn't free. Our money comes with debt. When distributing, say, one dollar, it's really not just one dollar. It's really $1 + x amount of debt. How can we repay our debt? we can't. What happens when we can't repay our debt? Ultimately, slavery. Not phyiscal, loss of freedom slavery, but rather, never-ending debt.


"What's the debate here," you might ask? It's simply this:

What is happening to America? Are we really the epitome of freedom and liberty? Are we turning into what we were trying to escape hundreds of years ago when we delcared our independance: a "corrupt" government? Should we have a different government? Finally, do you think America is fine the way it is?

Also, if you say "Where's your facts for any of this?"
I say, "I don't know, ask the people who made Zeitgeist."
I will say this, too, I am not agreeing with everything in the movie, rather, I am forming my own opinions based on publicity and news coverage. The fact that our government has things in store for us that we may not agree with is undisputable, and it will happen. Whether you are ready for this, or believe it, is another matter.


I'm anxious to see what everyone thinks.

As for myself, I am anti-government. Not so much as to say I would do anything to get me in serious trouble. I just don't agree with most of what the government does.

"What is happening to America?"
We fear, and are being ruled by fear.

"Are we really the epitome of freedom and liberty?"
In a country where a burglar can break into someone's home, gets injured, sues the family and wins, I say no.

"Are we turning into what we were trying to escape hundreds of years ago when we delcared our independance: a "corrupt" government?"
When we came to the new land a few hundred years ago, it was for religious freedom, and when we claimed our independance, we didn't want to be a part of a corrupt goverment. And here we are, in my opinion, with a worse government.

"Should we have a different government?"
If I can be immature for a moment, I think a Monarchy would be pretty cool. Otherwise, our government is probably the best thing we could have, ironically.

To conclude, the best way to comprehend any of this, if you aren't partial to watching the news, you should watch Zeitgeist. If you don't agree with anything in that movie, or this thread, great. I don't either. But what can you do to prove to anyone that our government is the greatest thing ever? Or that our government was exactly what our founding fathers had in mind?


For a summary of what it's all about, here is the Wikipedia page.
 

Crimson King

I am become death
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
28,982
Zeitgeist is the biggest load of bull**** because they actually believe 9/11 was an inside job. The "documentary" quoted in Zeitgeist is just Loose Change, the biggest joke ever. Fact is if the government EVER staged an event like 9/11 where they would have had to murder 3,000 Americans along with the already depleted New York City fire department, expose plenty of structural weaknesses, and show the world how easily intimidated we can be, they would have no problem killing off the kid who made Loose Change and wiping it from the internet.

Fact is the ONLY role the US government had in 9/11 was that they knew of known terrorist and people in the region of terrorist being taught to fly, but never to land. This information was about as useful as Pearl Harbor, which we also knew a massive attack was coming but we had no idea where or really how.
 

Stroupes

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 2, 2008
Messages
1,810
Location
Tennessee
Zeitgeist is the biggest load of bull**** because they actually believe 9/11 was an inside job. The "documentary" quoted in Zeitgeist is just Loose Change, the biggest joke ever. Fact is if the government EVER staged an event like 9/11 where they would have had to murder 3,000 Americans along with the already depleted New York City fire department, expose plenty of structural weaknesses, and show the world how easily intimidated we can be, they would have no problem killing off the kid who made Loose Change and wiping it from the internet.

Fact is the ONLY role the US government had in 9/11 was that they knew of known terrorist and people in the region of terrorist being taught to fly, but never to land. This information was about as useful as Pearl Harbor, which we also knew a massive attack was coming but we had no idea where or really how.

That's true. I didn't so much believe myself that the 9/11 was an inside job, but it was revealed to me that the government at least knew about it. But like I said, I don't believe everything about Zeitgeist either, espeically the Biblical theories.
 

Crimson King

I am become death
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
28,982
Zeitgeist is just a mesh of commonly held beliefs into one document. The religious stuff was pretty apt. Ishtar, pronounced Easter, WAS a Pagan holiday that celebrates fertility that Christianity adopted, hence where we get rabbits and eggs. Also, Ishtar had a son, who was killed by accident and sent to the sun where he united with his father. Then there was a slaughter of the boar who killed him, hence the Easter feasts.

No signatures.
 

Aesir

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
4,253
Location
Cts inconsistant antagonist
The First part of the movie mixes Fact and Fiction almost seamlessly, yes the story of Jesus is derived from pagan myths. But not solely from Horus, the Jesus story is inspired by many pagan gods. Christianity as a whole started out like many of the mystery cults that arose during the Hellenistic age.

The second and third parts are just bull and utter lies. The 9/11 truth movement does have some smart people back it up probably the most popular one is that Ex-head of the CIA guy. But as far as the government completely orchestrating it? Bush is a born-again christian you can link him to Hitler all you want but I don't think even he's that bad.

but the third one? is complete bull crap, they use over exaggerated claims and do not back them up at all.

I suggest you look into some of the claims they make, simply looking at their sources and doing some research you'll see many of their claims are not valid in the least bit.
 

Stroupes

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 2, 2008
Messages
1,810
Location
Tennessee
The second and third parts are just bull and utter lies. The 9/11 truth movement does have some smart people back it up probably the most popular one is that Ex-head of the CIA guy. But as far as the government completely orchestrating it? Bush is a born-again christian you can link him to Hitler all you want but I don't think even he's that bad.

but the third one? is complete bull crap, they use over exaggerated claims and do not back them up at all.

I suggest you look into some of the claims they make, simply looking at their sources and doing some research you'll see many of their claims are not valid in the least bit.

I don't think they were implying that the government carried it out, rather that the government could have possibly known about it or prevented it.
I do think that most of their sources are potentially unreliable, though.
 

Crimson King

I am become death
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
28,982
Actually, I forget the last one, but I believe it refers to the Federal Reserve Board. ANYTHING negative against the FRB is not even a fraction of how awful it really is.

The Board leader, Ben Bernake, is essentially the reason for our economic downturn. He ignored the warning signs and decided to print more money. Now the dollar is near worthless. Then they create this economic stimulus package with money we don't have. Great idea!
 

Vro

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
1,661
Location
Chicago
It's been known for quite a long time that 9/11 information gathered pre-9/11 could have potentially stopped it. Communication between agencies has always been poor. Post- 9/11, I believe a new policy was created to enforce communication in an attempt to prevent future travesties.

As far as religion goes, it's old news that Christianity is a party-bag of pagan ideas. Christmas, Easter, angels, halos, God, the devil; they're all old ideas carried thru from older religions. Does that reduce it's validity? Not really. If you take the facts of religion too seriously, I think you're in for a big let down.

I can't speak about the movie or conspiracies you've mentioned. I am going to watch Zeitgeist tho, because this is the 2nd recommendation I've gotten about it. But from the looks of it, just like any other documentary, it sucks in those who refuse to watch it with a grain of salt.
 

snex

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Messages
3,085
Location
Chicago, IL
worst. movie. EVAR.

even the first part was crap. if you take those "facts" to any credible historian they will laugh in your face. and im talkin about raving mad atheist historians here.

if we want people to come to correct conclusions, we need to root out bad arguments even if their conclusions agree with ours.
 

Vro

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
1,661
Location
Chicago
even the first part was crap. if you take those "facts" to any credible historian they will laugh in your face. and im talkin about raving mad atheist historians here.
What in particular? I just watched the first part, and most, albeit not all, seem credible towards mythology and history.
 

Aesir

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
4,253
Location
Cts inconsistant antagonist
He's probably talking about the case against the Historical Christ, it's something of an issue among the historical community though not a big issue.

That and Horus/ Christ Similarities are a bit off. Those Horus myths were written after the Egyptian era. There is no Deity that shares all the traits of Jesus. However there are many deities that share one or more similarities.
 

Vro

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
1,661
Location
Chicago
Yeah. I believe the movie stretched the truth a bit. But many ideas concerning Christ are not original. That is not to say, he is an exact copy of another deity, which the movie seemed to conclude.
 

SkylerOcon

Tiny Dancer
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
5,216
Location
ATX
I'm only going to talk about the 9-11 part of your post right now. I'm a giant conspiracy freak. I'll buy pretty much whatever you throw at me. But the idea of 9-11 being an inside job is the biggest load of crap I have ever heard.

Firstly, what the hell does the government have to gain by killing hundreds of innocent people? Yeah. Money. Believe it or not, Politicians actually care about people. Gasp. Everything you know is wrong now. They actually care about us? I guess FOX news must have been lying again!

Secondly, before you start saying stuff about controlled demolitions, those little puffs of smoke coming out of the side of the building were not explosions going off. You see, the falling of the floors above those where the supposed demolitions went off (notice that none happened above where the planes hit) was just the air that was compressed due to the floors falling above it. This air forced the smoke and debris out of the windows as the floors below began to fail as well.

If you need any more proof to destroy your bull**** claim, read these:

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Enjoy.
 

Crimson King

I am become death
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
28,982
Almost right after Loose Change came out, Popular Mechanics completely debunked all their claims. Naturally, the article was ignored.
 

EC_Joey

Smash Lord
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
1,719
Location
何?
you know how i know that the bush administration wasnt behind 9-11? it WORKED!
I laughed out loud. The US government does seem to be failing pretty hard as of late, what with the growing national debt, the current war in Iraq, and foreign relations in general. However, this doesn't justify people's decisions to make crackpot documentaries that are mostly speculation. It saddens me to think that many people who watch these documentaries take everything stated in them as fact.
 

Vro

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
1,661
Location
Chicago
I don't believe in the 9/11 conspiracy.
...they would have no problem killing off the kid who made Loose Change and wiping it from the internet.
However, wouldn't this be obvious? Just like in the anime Death Note, killing all those who investigate for further truth, usually leads to leaving more clues. And, should the conspiracy be true, the government could not manage to keep up killing all those who opposed. It'd be way too obvious.
 

Eor

Banned via Warnings
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
9,963
Location
Bed
Yes, it would be pretty obvious if the guy went missing.

But you'd think the government would be smarter then to have a plot that could be foiled by any idiot with the internet
 

Vro

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
1,661
Location
Chicago
You'd be surprise what you could find on the internet. I mean, the Bush administration might be bad at hiding their tracks.

In all seriousness, you're right. The probability that it was a conspiracy is just way too low.
 

whut?

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
347
Location
long island, NY
Its easy to say alot of things on these forums, where your words dont need to be backed up or have consequence..
thus you can easily debunk gravity if you so choose. Much of zeitgeist is true, mostly all, there are many obvious things that cant be ignored.
Many things that are still being discussed, but there is enough obvious proof to say "hey, the world is bigger than america".
humans as a collective are destroying earth, while they destroy each other, with the motive of being one complete entity.
Humanitys future is bleak if you think rationally, Right now there is little value placed on earth for some abnormal reason that the public is unaware of.(or for conquest & power, cliche example)

either way, i hope people take a look at this movie, ignore the format its presented in if it aggravates you,
but still, watch zeitgeist as an animal. Dont watch it with the brainwashed narrowminded mindset that many of you may have.
The creators probably had the dream of many people watching and wanting change, but that wont happen.
I was talking about this recently, people dont WANT change from society, people enjoy these luxurys we are rewarded with. We have been deprogrammed as animals, we wouldnt know how to live if society was abolished.(alot of people would die)
we're born with comfort but society takes that away, then gives it back as rewards for contributing to them.
Its a candy machine, you put a quarter in you get a lollipop out, people like lollipops, and whoever owns the machine likes quarters.

response to skyler: you cant present your argument with some respect? i guess not.
puffs of smoke arent explosive evidence, support beams within the towers would have upheld in the event of a plane strike,
(after it got through NORAD, which is impossible without notice)
the building would still be standing, at least the support system.
evidence of what you call an "inside job" is in the support beams, which were ALL cut at the same angle,
the way you demolish a building. They are cut at a diagonal angle, all of them the same, which would make them "slide" and collapse.
There has been so much more noted about this tragic incident, maybe you dont understand. You know nothing about the government,
the illuminati, you dont know what they would trade for what they are looking for. WE are different from THEM,
some people are afraid to acknowledge that we humans are in trouble.
 

snex

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Messages
3,085
Location
Chicago, IL
somebody is off their meds.

srsly, the claims of zeitgeist, all 3 chapters of it, are debunked in detail all over the internet. its not a debate if one side is just blathering out random conspiracy theories and the other side is pointing to scientific facts showing why they are wrong. real debates have some semblance of fairness to the opposing sides.
 

whut?

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
347
Location
long island, NY
somebody is off their meds.

srsly, the claims of zeitgeist, all 3 chapters of it, are debunked in detail all over the internet. its not a debate if one side is just blathering out random conspiracy theories and the other side is pointing to scientific facts showing why they are wrong. real debates have some semblance of fairness to the opposing sides.
nice job respecting my opinion. (sarcasm isnt usually one of my virtues)
"omfg u iz off yher meds" like that watered down statement means anything.
Maybe you shouldnt be taking so many meds..which side is the one blathering?
me and you are distant family, why are there "sides" anyway?
fairness has been present since the OG post, tell me, am i cheating or something?
youve yet to site any of the million biased theroys on the web that debunk what i say,
there will always be rebuttal, always be people who say "this isnt right, dont listen".
The scientific facts can be used by both sides, but the program 'zeitgeist' uses science more than the counter arguments ive seen here.

"But you'd think the government would be smarter then to have a plot that could be foiled by any idiot with the internet"

"any idiot" must be referring to people who organize data about the govt and put it online, after collecting it from countless sources.
even if 99% of the population believes this there is no stopping the government.
There will always be people in the dark, plans made by the govt will not be "foiled", america is not a spiderman villan...these plans are invincible.
unless you OVERTHROW a whole nation, which is a stupid notion. Especially when the nation makes us hate each other, there is no unity at all.
 

Aesir

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
4,253
Location
Cts inconsistant antagonist
Before I start "Whut?" heres a quote you should look into lol.
"You have someone make up a fake quote, or misrepresent a document, misrepresent the evidence. [Readers] assume: "This guy wouldn't lie. He wouldn't have made this stuff up." And so they go and repeat it. And so you get the lie repeated many times mostly by people who aren't lying - they really do think it's true. They just didn't check." - Richard Carrier

Part one:
Part one is just a rehash of the god who wasn't there except they take any evidence and SEVERELY misrepresent it. Throwing out false lies and wild accusations, they make it appear as if it's the consensus among historians that Christ was a myth. Which is incredibly incorrect, it's actually the opposite. Most Historians agree that christ was at least a real person. However many individuals like Robert M. Price, Earl Doherty, along with others make a pretty solid case that say. "Hey maybe he wasn't real" which has opened up the debate.

So part 1 isn't very creditable as it misrepresents the evidence horrifically.

Part 2. Is just a rehash of loose change thats easily refuted.

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html enjoy.


Part 3. is about the federal reserve and income tax's;

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/3616/FedReserveFacts.html <-- federal reserve debunked.

http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/jsiegel/Personal/taxes/F2F.htm <-- Income tax.


Zeitgeist is a wonderful movie of inspiration, inspiration in the sense that if you ever want to write a short story about a tyranical government this is your movie to draw inspiration from.
 

whut?

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
347
Location
long island, NY
Before I start "Whut?" heres a quote you should look into lol.
"You have someone make up a fake quote, or misrepresent a document, misrepresent the evidence. [Readers] assume: "This guy wouldn't lie. He wouldn't have made this stuff up." And so they go and repeat it. And so you get the lie repeated many times mostly by people who aren't lying - they really do think it's true. They just didn't check." - Richard Carrier
Counter arguing with a quote? Is this a school essay? Stop trying to patronize me through what someone else said, you are not Richard carrier.
What makes you think i wouldnt agree with the above quote? I do, alot of posters here fit under this description.

So part 1 isn't very creditable as it misrepresents the evidence horrifically.
STILL no proof, you still have not said anything that makes sense yet.
"well, its not credible, because it misrepresents" HOW? does it misrepresent, it does not,
the bulk of part one was the notion that jesus is a pagan myth based off other myths.
As far as i can see there is enough evidence to support that argument, and not dismiss it as a "horrific misrepresentation".
Part 2. Is just a rehash of loose change thats easily refuted.
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html enjoy.
enjoy? you fail at patronizing me once again.
loose change has nothing to do with what we are talking about, i dont care about that program,
i for one have heard it wasnt very professional, but ive never seen it.
Ive already noted one piece of evidence which you havent commented on, or that web page,
this argument wont go anywhere, so just respect me at least.

Part 3. is about the federal reserve and income tax's;

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/3616/FedReserveFacts.html <-- federal reserve debunked.
you think you can say something is debunked by posting a link?
this web page has just as much conspiracy as zeitgeist,
I am/WAS trying to discuss 911 specifically, not the privately owned debt laying federal reserve.
Zeitgeist is a wonderful movie of inspiration, inspiration in the sense that if you ever want to write a short story about a tyranical government this is your movie to draw inspiration from.
Great job Aesir, you formed an opinion, maybe its best if we steer clear of each other.
I wish you the best anyway

EDIT: snex im not talking to you dood, i dont care what you say. My 'argument' is about events that happened before this program, i have no dependence on a movie, but it was relevant since the thread is ABOUT it. Once again you keep talking about these rumored experts who seem to only exist in the depths of your mind, "expertise" is misleading.

Aesir: i am not biased, and for the longest time i was confused about 911.
I looked at the big picture & learned from both sides of the event, then realized what i believe now.
the evidence i said was how the support system of the towers was tampered with,
if the support system was left alone the towers would still be standing(even if only the support beams were left). The beams that held the building together were abnormally weakened/cut to aid in collapse. Like i said there are many aspects of this tragedy we have ignored,
(USA training the Hijackers how to fly planes etc.) and nobody feels guilt for it.
 

snex

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Messages
3,085
Location
Chicago, IL
whut, since you havent actually presented any argument yourself, and have rather decided to rest your entire side on a movie on the internet, it is quite reasonable to simply respond with links that debunk the stupid movie. you have put no effort into defending your side of the argument, so why should anybody engage you or take you seriously?

the entire movie has been debunked time and time again by *real* experts working in *relevant* fields. get over it!
 

Aesir

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
4,253
Location
Cts inconsistant antagonist
Counter arguing with a quote? Is this a school essay? Stop trying to patronize me through what someone else said, you are not Richard carrier.
What makes you think i wouldnt agree with the above quote? I do, alot of posters here fit under this description.
A lot of conspiracy nuts too, don't believe everything you see look at both sides and make a judgment based on that.

Doesn't matter if I'm not Richard Carrier either, I'm not claiming it's my quote.

STILL no proof, you still have not said anything that makes sense yet.
"well, its not credible, because it misrepresents" HOW? does it misrepresent, it does not,
the bulk of part one was the notion that jesus is a pagan myth based off other myths.
As far as i can see there is enough evidence to support that argument, and not dismiss it as a "horrific misrepresentation".
If I remember correctly the movie references Horus as a huge influence of Christianity, while Horus and Jesus share many traits he's far from being plagiarized.

The movie reference's that Horus was born of a virgin this is incorrect as Isis wasn't a virgin. She had sex with a disembodied Osiris thus not a virgin birth. Though ironically she seems to always be a virgin even after sex which is odd but it's open to interpretation.

Secondly Horus didn't have 12 disciples he probably didn't have any, there's no evidence that he had 12 that's for certain.

as for the other similarities I can't say right now, there's probably some similarities if you stretch the truth about. Again though I don't disagree with the fact that Jesus story was borrowed from other myths.

Also the majority of the film is about Jesus being mythical, it places emphasis on the fact that the fight between night and day is an on going battle when it isn't Horus beats Set and gains control of the night.

Many of the other gods again some of their similarities coincide with Jesus others don't, Jesus comes from many walks of life. (no pun intended.)

enjoy? you fail at patronizing me once again.
loose change has nothing to do with what we are talking about, i dont care about that program,
i for one have heard it wasnt very professional, but ive never seen it.
Ive already noted one piece of evidence which you havent commented on, or that web page,
this argument wont go anywhere, so just respect me at least.
I haven't watched the film since it first came out so I can't remember ever little detail. I know it referenced loose change heavily which is why I posted that. What piece of evidence is that? You can't just say there's one and not say what it is.



you think you can say something is debunked by posting a link?
this web page has just as much conspiracy as zeitgeist,
I am/WAS trying to discuss 911 specifically, not the privately owned debt laying federal reserve.
Prove it.

Great job Aesir, you formed an opinion, maybe its best if we steer clear of each other.
I wish you the best anyway
That last bit was more of a joke then anything else I'm incredibly sarcastic.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I came here for the snex flames. I wasn't disappointed. Although, you could have been a little more mean.

See me after class, snex.
 

SkylerOcon

Tiny Dancer
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
5,216
Location
ATX
response to skyler: you cant present your argument with some respect? i guess not.
I'm not going to be respectful towards something that has already been debunked several times.

puffs of smoke arent explosive evidence, support beams within the towers would have upheld in the event of a plane strike,
(after it got through NORAD, which is impossible without notice)
the building would still be standing, at least the support system.
I know puffs of smoke aren't explosive evidence. Isn't that exactly what I said? And compressed air can destory support beams. That dastardly gravity struck again!

evidence of what you call an "inside job" is in the support beams, which were ALL cut at the same angle,
the way you demolish a building. They are cut at a diagonal angle, all of them the same, which would make them "slide" and collapse.
Things cut at the same angle also help them stand up better.

There has been so much more noted about this tragic incident, maybe you dont understand. You know nothing about the government,
the illuminati, you dont know what they would trade for what they are looking for. WE are different from THEM,
some people are afraid to acknowledge that we humans are in trouble.
...

Wait...

You do realize that there is no proof that the Illuminati survived through the 19th century, right? The Ordo Templi Orientus and other organizations claiming to be Illuminati can never prove that they have any direct correlation to the true Illuminati. They can't be looking for anything, because they disappeared a long, long time ago.
 

doom dragon 105

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 17, 2006
Messages
1,487
Location
Miami
ive seen the documentary its a bunch of bs. 911 wasn't an inside job . people just have to blame someone close to us. its human nature.

Yes, it would be pretty obvious if the guy went missing.

But you'd think the government would be smarter then to have a plot that could be foiled by any idiot with the internet
thanks you thats true
 

DARKALONDITE

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
138
Location
Georgia (hicksville)
Even though, I haven't seen the zeitgeist documentary, I agree that the government is corrupt to no end. Innocent people have died in American prisons while murderers and thieves are allowed to roam free. And I do believe that there was a 9-11 conspiracy but not in the way that it happened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom