Realistic Ratios Pt2

[- Theelitebrawler -]

Ok if these are per-say 100-0 match-ups, Why are we even trying? I know I would probably be
the last person to say that but if thats the case there is no way Mario can beat them then why try?

(Btw I highly disagree that these are unwinnable, Im trying to get your point of view.)

 

[Kanzaki]

By his logic, since he can't beat said character, it must be 100-0. That's just silly.

 

[Sleek Media]

Ok if these are per-say 100-0 match-ups, Why are we even trying? I know I would probably be
the last person to say that but if thats the case there is no way Mario can beat them then why try?

(Btw I highly disagree that these are unwinnable, Im trying to get your point of view.)

Because nobody should play Mario in order to win. If that's your main concern, then go MK every time. I play Mario because I like Mario. That's all.

The topic, however, is which matches are 100-0, if any, and why. If they exist, and you don't want to play Mario anymore, that's your choice. Don't let your bias get in the way of the discussion, though. If you disagree anyway, tell us how you think we can beat the "unbeatable" characters.

 

[~ Gheb ~]

That depends on how you define a match-up number. If you consider a match-up ratio nothing but the ratio of games won out of a certain amount of rounds it's not unreasonable to give Mario a "0" in certain match-ups but definitely not out of 100 games.