The face that launched a thousand furries
Soooo, Lola Bunny. A character that really needs no introduction, except for the fact that she was basically introduced to audiences 3 times with 3 different personalities, voice actresses, and designs. Her history is as confusing as her popularity is outsized, and as I think those complexities all affect her odds, I'll explain her history as briefly as can be.
Lola Bunny made her triumphant debut in the original Space Jam. In that movie, Lola is depicted as a voluptuous, femme fatale type who speaks in a sultry tone, makes sexy poses, and serves as Bugs' love interest. On the flipside, she's also the only competent basketball player aside from Michael Jordan, meaning she gets a lot of screen time where she's just playing the game. Somewhere in the middle of those two aspects is her actual personality: Lola's shtick is that she doesn't want to be objectified, with her catchphrase being "Don't call me 'doll'", though whether that works, feels more like a satire, or is undercut by the movie itself is up to the viewer, I guess.
Space Jam was a huge hit back in its day and is still remembered (fondly or ironically). While it's a movie with a lot of winning elements – the sheer 90s-ness of it, the inclusion of MJ and Bill Murray, the soundtrack – Lola is its breakout character. As for why... I'm not gonna ignore the anthropomorphic elephant in the room: lots of people probably realized something about themselves watching Lola. She is a furry icon, and that's a factor that'll come into play later.
After Space Jam, Lola stuck around. She was popular, and basically the only female Looney Tune, so why not? From what I gather her depiction stayed mostly faithful to Space Jam's, with Kath Soucie still voicing her, though apparently her profession was changed to a reporter? I guess pro basketball player isn't a job that lends itself to many storylines, so whatever.
Fast forward to 2011. The Looney Tunes Show reinvents the franchise as a sort of animated sitcom that still keeps the zany humor of the original shorts. That, on paper, sounds terrible, like something you'd do if you ran out of ideas, but it really worked. With this reinvention comes one for Lola: now voiced by Kristen Wiig, this Lola is an eccentric, harebrained, unpredictable loon who disarms you with her antics and cheerful disposition. Her relationship with Bugs is more or less all in her mind, she's now friends with Daffy and new character Tina, and she could be said to stand on her own. If Lola's original incarnation was seen as a product of its time, this one arrived to address any and every criticism people had about Lola, and made a damn good entertaining character.
That said, as acclaimed as it was, it was, let's say, too complex a performance to work in any context. The Looney Tunes are a brand, so the characters need to be simple, immediately understandable to anyone – Bugs is a wise guy, Daffy an angry loser, etc. Lola as a character always walking the tightrope between lovable and annoying, who could jump from deadpan to impish to beaming with joy, I guess must have been too complex for the powers that be because when New Looney Tunes started, it depicted Lola as a bit of a mix between the Space Jam and LTS depictions. Kath Soucie was back, but the cartoony artsyle of the latter show stayed, and Lola's personality was a mix of both, still being quirky and carefree but also capable of displaying the original version's tomboyish and sporty attitude. A good compromise, right...?
Fast forward to the end times... last year. Warner Bros. needs to sell HBO Max. Someone realizes: "Wasn't Space Jam originally an ad for Nikes or something? We can do that again! But this time, instead of other people's brands, we promote only our own." And that creatively bankrupt pitch spawns a creatively bankrupt movie.
As for Lola, the people involved look at the original version, decide that's not apt for the moviegoing audience of today, and decide she needs to be updated. Thankfully since they already have a great blueprint for how a 21st century Lola acts like with the LTS and NLT versions, they... completely ignore them. Now Lola is a generic, girl power version of herself, who hangs out with Wonder Woman for... honor, I guess? And aside from that makes little impact and isn't even allowed to have any hint of romance with Bugs. ...Progress?
Even before the movie was released, the latest incarnation of Lola caused a stir because of her redesign. I'm taking a neutral stance here. On one hand, if a character's appearance ruins them for you, then that was all you cared about to begin with, which isn't a great look. On the other hand, I acknowledge that for many furries, Lola being hot was instrumental in letting them come to terms with being a furry, and they'd obviously be protective of that. Whatever your stance on it, we can all agree that Space Jam 2's version of Lola is widely unpopular, which is an important factor.
So yeah. 26 years, 3 versions of Lola. The thing that's hard to determine is whether their pros are additive or if the 3 incarnations are in competition with each other. With alternate skins and even alternate voicelines, it's technically possible that all three versions of Lola join the fray, ending all discussion. Lola has an obvious concept for her moveset – one focusing on basketball – which would fit both Space Jams incarnations (and wouldn't be that out of character for LTS Lola either). In fact, I think that puts her over the likes of Daffy in terms of priority. However, the rumored inclusion of Lebron as a fighter would put a dent in that as her concept would be taken, putting her back at square one.
If we stack the three against each other, I'd say SJ Lola has the advantage in terms of popularity (she has a mainstream movie and the adoration of all furries on her resume). LTS Lola has the support of professional critics and animation fans (both audiences that didn't particularly care for Space Jam's simple charms). SJ2 Lola has the support of... Warner Bros. Maybe. SJ2 did do relatively well for a pandemic release but was lambasted by critics and is basically a laughingstock for how blatant it is in its marketing designs. Would they want to include this version of Lola or sweep her under the rug with the rest of the movie? The fact that Lebron is apparently on the way would suggest that no, they're not trying to forget A New Legacy happened, but we'll see if it pans out. And let's say they do include Lola. Would they be willing to add a Space Jam 1 version as an alt, complete with increased boobage and "Don't call me 'doll'" voicelines? Wouldn't that undercut the creative team for SJ2 and the reasoning behind the changes?
I'm rambling. The conclusion I draw is that Space Jam 2 Lola is the frontrunner, with Space Jam 1 Lola right behind her. I could see either making it alone, or both being alts of each other, with LTS Lola being a distant third that would probably require the other two to be alts before being considered. Her fanbase just isn't as loud as SJ1 Lola's, sorry to say.
Chance:
Space Jam Lola: 15%
Looney Tunes Show Lola: 8%
Space Jam 2 Lola: 20%
Overall: 25%
Want:
Space Jam Lola: 100%
Weird post-Space Jam reporter Lola: 100%
Looney Tunes Show Lola: 100%
New Looney Tunes Lola: 100%
Loonatics Lexi Bunny alt for some reason: 100%
Space Jam 2 Lola: 0%
I'm a fan of Lola, and honestly I appreciate how much she's changed throughout her history. As amageish said, there are a bunch of proto-Lolas with similar designs predating Space Jam, which is really cool as she kind of has a lineage of her own. Space Jam is a very fun movie with that very specific attitude that you can only get from a 90s comedy and I always found Lola to be a very cool character in it, she's one of the MVPs. The Looney Tunes Show I've already raved about enough but yeah, Kristen Wiig's a genius and her Lola is no exception.
Space Jam 2 though, that kinda pissed me off. The redesign's whatever, like I said, I'm neutral on it, and the Looney Tunes are in that awful CG for half the movie anyway so the movie's failed on appearances either way. What really rubbed me the wrong way was the hypocrisy in acting like they were reinventing the character to be a good modern role model, only to leave her completely devoid of personality. Don't be dissing other people's work if you're unable to even match it, flaws and all. Plus it's totally dismissive of the fact that Lola was already reinvented, and quite well, thank you very much. And the other thing I didn't like was how Kath Soucie had recorded her voicelines to reprise her role, and at the last minute she was replaced by Zendaya just to have another name talent involved. No hate on Zendaya, this is on the producers, but she really phoned it in and failed to make the role her own. So at the end of the day it's yet another example of how Hollywood and the industry in general shows no respect for the work of professional voice actors, and that's a pet peeve of mine. So yeah. Keep that phony Lola away from... everything.
But really though I hope one of the cool Lolas gets in. She's a dope character.
Noms: Peacemaker