madgick
Smash Rookie
do you think Nintendo might make optional updates in the future (ie. after the release) on the Wii shopping channel thingy. they could put new characters/levels/challenges... loadsa stuf on there?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
just because it should be free, does not mean that it would be free.I'd think stuff like that would be free, actualy.
Great idea! At least it would keep Sakurai and co tied over for a while longer...Knowing them, they might have "packs" of characters, maybe the same price as a NES game.
What I mean is when the last Super Smash Bros. game comes out.There might be some online patches available for download but I doubt they would cost money or wiipoints. Also, what's this about a final smashbros. game?
I don't think it's incomplete. It's like Animal Crossing (with the e-Reader cards): It's making Smash more custom to whatever you want. For example, if there was an update you could download to let you play as...Bonk. Say you didn't like Bonk. You wouldn't have to download the update. But all the people who like Bonk WOULD download it.Downloadable content is stupid. I like my games to be complete when packaged.
It's not getting free upgrades. It's buying an incomplete game.
that certainly would kick ***, The Return of Dr. Mario, Ice Climbers, Mr. Game & Watchdo you think Nintendo might make optional updates in the future (ie. after the release) on the Wii shopping channel thingy. they could put new characters/levels/challenges... loadsa stuf on there?
My only opposition to this is that it would be an arbitrary, semi-random exclusion of access to stuff you have specifically paid money for. If the player isn't going to be allowed access to things he normally would be, he needs to know up front. Otherwise he'll get to the Character Select screen with his opponent and then notice his favorite (downloadable) character isn't available. The player is fairly likely to go "Pfft, I'm not going to play, then" and disconnect. Not everyone will do that, but I imagine enough will to make it a genuine issue... and I have trouble universally condemning that behavior; perhaps the player was trying to practice for a tournament and needed to access that specific character.(snip)If certain characters aren't in one of the player's list, it won't appear.
Downloadable content is stupid. I like my games to be complete when packaged.
It's not getting free upgrades. It's buying an incomplete game.
Tom Nook>>>>>>Tom Nook(?)>>>>>>>>Tom Nook(!?)Wreked: It stands to reason that if the character roster can be expanded (and thus modified, it is inherently being changed), that other aspects of game-data could be too. In the case of Tom Nook, they could have players download a modified Smashville map where he's not present in the background. Or for Samurai Goroh, just have players download a data-file that blocks him from showing up as an AT. So on and so forth.
Or they could simply allow for the 'logic error' and have Tom Nook the Character summon Tom Nook the Assist Trophy while Tom Nook the Background Element looks on. This is really no worse than Fox fighting Fox; it looks odd, it has genuine aesthetic problems, but we tolerate it in favor of more variety in play.
It might sound freaky, but by visiting other towns you can get DUPLICATE townies.Tom Nook>>>>>>Tom Nook(?)>>>>>>>>Tom Nook(!?)
I'd die laughing. Ph34r t3h replicating Tom Nooks! IT'S T3H MATRIX!!!
Well, the solution to that problem is to filter on people who have certain characters available.My only opposition to this is that it would be an arbitrary, semi-random exclusion of access to stuff you have specifically paid money for. If the player isn't going to be allowed access to things he normally would be, he needs to know up front. Otherwise he'll get to the Character Select screen with his opponent and then notice his favorite (downloadable) character isn't available. The player is fairly likely to go "Pfft, I'm not going to play, then" and disconnect. Not everyone will do that, but I imagine enough will to make it a genuine issue... and I have trouble universally condemning that behavior; perhaps the player was trying to practice for a tournament and needed to access that specific character.
If he knows up front it's going to be 'core only' (or some other series of exclusions and limitations), he can voluntarily enter that situation and that's fine. But once you buy something, there is the expectation you will virtually always be able to use it at your leisure unless you're told ahead of time that you can't/won't.