D
Deleted member
Guest
It's 2016 and we've got people spamming TriHard in the SGDQ chat during the DK64 Any% run.
gosh golly gee
gosh golly gee
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Have you played ESA? It is really fun, but I'm sure you would hate it; it is somewhat. Quirky.L-CANCELINGGGGGGG
lol heaerthstoneI can't wait for the rush down character to far and away be the best character, with the whole metagame designed entirely around dealing with it
weebs
I liek how she is brown beautiful waifu in my haremJust a disclaimer: I'm nit trying to start ****, I'm just asking a legitimate question.
Alright, so, to preface, I guess I should ask how you feel about a character like Pharah. Do you like her basic concept and design? If yes, what about it so you like?
And then, if yes, also: what makes her design different/better than the ashani one?
After actually getting to see the video, that was one of the first things that came to mind. I'll ask about it on the fb page, I guess.
Maybe they intentionally put out this pre-pre-alpha concept expecting it to get roasted and wanted the community input. Also probably showing that work is getting done.The model looks like injustice level of bad combined with the low poly model, look like some mortal kombat game from the ps2 era, and i dont think this is how you reveal characters, just look at smash 4, SF V,BB,and GG newcomers trailers, a character needs to be show in motion, because that's half the character personality,hell if you compare the idle animation to Captain Falcon you can see how much better Cap animation is at showing this personality.
tbh a game with entirely falcon esque characters would probably be both fun and balanced. I think he is the only successfully implemented glass cannon in smash.
Tell me when they have ESA or memetroid gaemsIt's 2016 and we've got people spamming TriHard in the SGDQ chat during the DK64 Any% run.
gosh golly gee
not sure what that isHave you played ESA? It is really fun, but I'm sure you would hate it; it is somewhat. Quirky.
white pikmin does something ungodly stupid like 6%I recently realized how strong Bowser's pummel is. 4%? Is any other character's this strong?
Whadda****white pikmin does something ungodly stupid like 6%
I remember discussing this video in one of my physics classes in highschool. While treating the 4th dimension as time works for this model, it also causes us to fall into the same trap as the 2d "flatlander" has, of mentally not accepting there is another spacial dimension "greater" than ours. While we cannot physically see other dimensions if they exist, we are able to create models of what higher dimensional objects look like while intercecting into our 3d plane of existence (so like how to someone who can only see 2 dimensions, a body passing through would just be cross sections fading in/out). For example hypercubes are commonly used https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x4P65EKjt0 . If a 4th dimensional being traveled through our plane. we would see its "guts" as whatever a dimensional cross section would look like. This is where it gets all speculatory and science fiction though.Helpme body this fraudster.it burns.
it never gets betterIsn't calling the 4th dimension time very misleading? You started at 2 then moved to 3 spatial dimensions, but suddenly you added a temporal dimension. By glossing over the change you miss an important distinction, temporal dimensions are considered unidirectional whereas spatial are considered bidirectional. Time is asymmetric, or non-reversible, primarily due to the 2nd law of thermodynamics. You seem agree with this unidirectionality, because you never suggest "walking" back in time as per your analogy. You further mislead with your analogy by suggesting instantaneous travel is possible with higher dimensions. The ant never "magically transports" from one place to the next on his 2D plane because the supposedly 2D plane is actually 3D. For example, if you believed the Earth was essentially flat, and you traveled across the world in a straight line, eventually finding yourself at your starting point; then you would conclude, barring any mistakes in your navigation, the Earth is a sphere. You would not conclude that you physically teleported once reaching a certain boundary, even though you could abstract the three-dimensionality as such on a 2D map. All your ant tells us is the existence of higher dimensions can very easily go unobserved unless actively measuring for them. For seemingly magical and instantaneous transport, you would require an observer who is unable to observe the 3rd dimension, and one who is able to traverse in 3D. While the observer will see the traverser disappear when he leaves the 2D plane it will be notable that the traverser's reemergence in a different location will not be instant in any case.
/nerdrage
Precal teacher lied to me. 0^0 isn't always undefined. It is actually frequently treated as 1 to avoid adhocing rules for zero.
Educator scum.
e: Actually all my teachers just neglected to accurately define undefined, so it would represent multiple possibilities instead of an impossibility.
Educating scum.
This is an ∃mergency guys.Code:x = y divide y from both sides x/y = 1 0/0 = 1 at the origin because division is defined in terms of multiplication it is better to represent it as f(a,b) b * x = a
plsThere's 132 dimensions, and in each one Captain Fapcoj is the best Smash character
Even by its own logic: 3d is a single instant of our universe, and 4d contains all these instants chronologically. Then he acts like the ability to access the 5th dimension also lets us use the other direction of time. BUT IT DOESN'T. IT IS THE SAME AS THIS STUPID MOCK UP I MADE. YOU ARE STILL USING THE SECOND DIMENSIONI remember discussing this video in one of my physics classes in highschool. While treating the 4th dimension as time works for this model, it also causes us to fall into the same trap as the 2d "flatlander" has, of mentally not accepting there is another spacial dimension "greater" than ours. While we cannot physically see other dimensions if they exist, we are able to create models of what higher dimensional objects look like while intercecting into our 3d plane of existence (so like how to someone who can only see 2 dimensions, a body passing through would just be cross sections fading in/out). For example hypercubes are commonly used https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x4P65EKjt0 . If a 4th dimensional being traveled through our plane. we would see its "guts" as whatever a dimensional cross section would look like. This is where it gets all speculatory and science fiction though.
I really do enjoy that model of Time, but its lacking from a spacial standpoint. Where the time model is nice is that it is definitely finite up to the point of our understanding of existence and possibilities, while spacial dimension models have no limit, and nothing observable.
you're saying that something is incorrect here but then implying that you're doing the same thingI remember discussing this video in one of my physics classes in highschool. While treating the 4th dimension as time works for this model, it also causes us to fall into the same trap as the 2d "flatlander" has, of mentally not accepting there is another spacial dimension "greater" than ours. While we cannot physically see other dimensions if they exist, we are able to create models of what higher dimensional objects look like while intercecting into our 3d plane of existence (so like how to someone who can only see 2 dimensions, a body passing through would just be cross sections fading in/out).
My friend needs help learning to El cancel.you're saying that something is incorrect here but then implying that you're doing the same thing
Explain?you're saying that something is incorrect here but then implying that you're doing the same thing
Explain?
I know I'm just getting blecked though, idk why I'm falling into the pattern
http://www.spanishdict.com/translate/cancellationDon't be ridiculous, Cancel is a feminine noun. La Cancel.
Delet this~! (In Spanish)
naturally it's being argued that it would be immediately banned for "direct advantages" (the direct advantages are that you can do these things without murdering your hands)PMS | LEVEL 100 MAGIKARP
i would still prefer an analog joystick, but this in interesting for sure.
the button layout is really similar to what i would want for mine, as well.
I've personally never been to an event where the TO has complained about springs being removed from triggers.naturally it's being argued that it would be immediately banned for "direct advantages" (the direct advantages are that you can do these things without murdering your hands)
remember, melee TOs still get overly upset about basic things like removing springs from triggers, and even the slightest implication of changing what each button does results in angry people. they're obsessively stubborn with making sure nobody can switch off their terrible control setup which directly resulted in literal hand fractures in top players
The form got updated and no one told me so the old link was dead. Thank you for catching that, it's been fixedWarchamp7 Is it normal I get a restricted access error when I click the apply for sub league thing on the rankings
Oh sorry. You're right. I do that thing that actually matters. You know, the one that real higher authority told me to do. Because that exists.Look at all these problems that people create by overthinking. Why not just instead of wasting time pondering things that don't really matter?