Here is what I propose for the Pokemon Researcher User Group:
1. A second leader.
2. Close inspection of present and future applicants.
3. Redefining of what a "Pokemon Researcher (or Professor)" is. Include both the competitive and conceptual aspects of the game series.
4. A change to tomato.
That being said, we should vote on applicants for a second leader. I want applications PM'd to me by...
Include:
1. Why you think you should be a leader.
2. What significant contributions you've made to the Poké Center.
3. Any other qualities that you feel help define you.
After the voting process, I will take the top three candidates to the staff and we will vote from there.
1. A second leader.
2. Close inspection of present and future applicants.
3. Redefining of what a "Pokemon Researcher (or Professor)" is. Include both the competitive and conceptual aspects of the game series.
4. A change to tomato.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8afe9/8afe9fc32b6d3f8bd25c60d032795aca012b7ea8" alt=""
That being said, we should vote on applicants for a second leader. I want applications PM'd to me by...
Friday, March 26th, 11:59 PM
Include:
1. Why you think you should be a leader.
2. What significant contributions you've made to the Poké Center.
3. Any other qualities that you feel help define you.
After the voting process, I will take the top three candidates to the staff and we will vote from there.