• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Pokémon Battle Revolution - The Sariku Review

Sariku

Smash Master
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,384
Location
Biloxi, Mississippi
I recently got Pokémon Battle Revolution for the Nintendo Wii, as some of you may or may not already have known. For the one or two of you out there who don't know, all Pokémon Battle Revolution is is Pokémon Stadium 3, minus the mini games and Gym Leader tower. This game was the first to use Nintendo's WiFi Connection (For the Nintendo Wii), but unfortunately got a lot of hate by not only games critics like IGN and GameSpot, but hardcore and casual Pokémon alike. Reasons ranged from bad WiFi Servers to a dull single player mode. I want to give you my ideas on this game, and help you possibly reconsider buying this game later on.


Pokémon Battle Revolution North American Box Art

Quick Summary :
As stated before, this is just a continuation of the Pokémon Stadium series, that originated on the Nintendo 64. If you own Pokémon Diamond/Pearl, you can connect it to your Nintendo Wii wirelessly and use your personal Pokémon anywhere in the game. If you don't own the DS Pokémon titles, this game is practically useless. You can battle in multiple colosseums, or stadiums, and battle using their rules. You can usually use your own Pokémon, but sometimes are forced to use rental ones. As you progress through the single player, you can get "money" to buy clothes and accessories to "pimp out" your own trainer. This game has two WiFi modes, "Battle With Someone" and "Battle With Friend."

Single Player :
There are twelve colosseums to battle in, each with their own rules and quirks. Finishing this colosseum will unlock the stage for use in Local Multiplayer and WiFi Multiplayer. The stage has no affect on the battle. You earn Poké Coupons for winning, which is the games form of currency. You can spend this in the shop to buy clothes and accessories for your Pokémon trainer(s). Some of these colosseums are very fun, such as the Crystal Colosseum (Is set up in a tournament style bracket.), while others are completely stupid (The Neon Colosseum comes to mind. Your Pokémon and your opponents are put on a wheel, and you randomly get four Pokémon. Your opponent will also get some. This can cause you to get bad, computer Pokémon and your opponent has a chance to get your personally raised ones.) Other than the few obnoxious ones though, this is somewhat enjoyable. Of course, it's not as good as Pokémon Stadium's, but not many, if any, console Pokémon games are.

The trainer customization is alright. It's great fun to make a trainer completely originally, even with your own catch phrases for winning, losing, sending out a Pokémon, and so on. Unfortunately, you must buy all the clothes for your trainer, and a lot are sort of expensive. This forces you to trudge through the single player again, if only one coloseum. For now, this is okay; but in the next Pokémon Stadium incarnation, I desire full trainer custom ability, such as you will find in Tony Hawk games and such.

Score - 7/10

Online Play :
I have not played any local multiplayer matches, but it seems to play exactly as it does on WiFi. Like all online Nintendo games, you must exchange a 12-digit friend code with someone to play them specifically. You can set up your own rules from the main menu of the game, and can use those custom rules online with friends. That ranges from level of Pokémon to "clauses" that we use in competitive play today. When the game first launched, the servers weren't that great. But now they seem to play somewhat smoothly; whether it's because of the lack of people playing or just improved by Nintendo, it doesn't matter. It runs fairly smoothly with little disconnections. Playing with a friend has never been funner in the word of Pokémon, and I recommend this game only for that if you have the desire.

You can play with random people, but this isn't nearly as fun as with friends. You can usually find someone to play, and all matches are Lv. 50 Pokemon. You can search for single of double battle, choose your colosseum, and them fight your enemy. I have always been able to find someone so far, but maybe I'm just lucky. Unfortunately though, half the battles you will have is some guy using a team of ubers. Of course, it hurts his pride to kill them with normal Pokémon (I killed a Rayquaza with my Weezing Yesterday :D), it is no fun to lose a match because the other Pokémon are unfair for play. Because of this, I do the offline single player more than play online because I can at least get Poké Coupons to customize my trainer some more. The redeeming quality to this though is amazing, and something Nintendo should do more often: After every match, you have the chance to exchange passes (Friend Codes) with your opponent. If both say yes, he will be added to your friends list. This makes it an easy way to find great people to battle.

The servers aren't nearly as good as games like Mario Kart Wii's, but they seem to work well.

Score - 8/10

Closing Comments :
As you can see, I have given this game a lot more credit than almost anybody, but this will vary on one thing. I do not recommend this game if you buy it for over $30. Even $30 may be pushing. If you can find this game for a good $20 or so, I recommend buying it immediately. It isn't worth the full $50, but it isn't that bad a game if you can get it cheap.

Total Score - 7/10






 

Bowser King

Have It Your Way
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,737
Location
Ontario, Canada
I have it to and have to say your review is almost dead on.What ruined it for me was that once done single player you cant do much other then wifi, which is much like stadium, but I still expected more.
 

Firus

You know what? I am good.
BRoomer
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
7,681
NNID
OctagonalWalnut
3DS FC
0619-4291-4974
Yeah, I like this review. I agree with it.

Unfortunately, I bought the game close to release...wish I had known it was really not worth $50 before I bought it. Oh well.

But yeah, I have run into many people online using a team of ubers...I always laugh when I take them out with a simple Pokemon. I mean, honestly; do these idiots actually think that a team of ubers, untouched from the moment you caught them, is going to be good?

My main gripe with this game is the annoying rules for Colosseums and the fact that the game has little replayability. If they had only had so much as mini games, it would've been so much better.
 

Firus

You know what? I am good.
BRoomer
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
7,681
NNID
OctagonalWalnut
3DS FC
0619-4291-4974
The two words above MADE Pokemon Stadium 1 & 2. I played those mini games far more than actually battling.
Yeah, same. Well, at least with Pokemon Stadium 1. I never got 2, to my severe disappointment. I should probably try to get that sometime. The Stadium games probably won't get released on VC, since that'd be nearly impossible to pull off, with no way to connect GameBoy games to the Wii.

But yeah, I always played the minigames. I especially enjoyed "Sushi Go-Round". I always laughed when the Lickitungs flailed around the room after eating something spicy or something that made them sick or whatever.

I played 2 a couple of times, I remember it being fun, (the minigames, I think I played one actual battle on that?) but I really don't remember much of it.

Although I still remember when I reached Lt. Surge on the Gym Leader tower and it was either a Pikachu or a Raichu that had Surf...I was shocked. :laugh:
 

Bowser King

Have It Your Way
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,737
Location
Ontario, Canada
we need another pokemon game for wii. let it have an adventure story like colisseum and XD gale of darkness. PLEASE!!!!!
How about a 3-D pokemon game that was like the portable ones. I would so buy that. Plus think, if they can fit so much onto a portable game, how much they should be able to do on console game.
 

Mewter

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
3,609
The two words above MADE Pokemon Stadium 1 & 2. I played those mini games far more than actually battling.
Yes, yes they did. The mini games were quite fun. For some reason though, battling was more fun in the Stadium games than in the new ones.... was it the color changing nicknames that made battles so fun? I liked playing free batlle with red, blue, and black stomached mewtwos(not to mention 1 orange mew)
 

Bowser King

Have It Your Way
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,737
Location
Ontario, Canada
I say no to a new game if it features Shadow Pokemon >.>
Agreed. I would also like the ability to actually fight real wild pokemon, not just pokemon who come when you leave food (cheese?) out for them.


Colluseum and gale of darkness must have seemed so dule for people who dont have the portable games/GBA-GC connecter. All you had was the shadow pokemon (which you had to purify or have to use call every other turn :ohwell: ) and the pokemon who appeared at the poke spots (which wernt even in colluseum).
 

MajinNecro69

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
657
If they just added a load of rental Pokemon like in Pokemon Stadium 1 (every Poke was available for rent from the beginning), it would have greatly added to PBR's casual multiplayer. But I did like to cool Electivire they gave out through it. Saved me a lot of breeding it did :D
 

urdailywater

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,563
I actually thought BR was gonna be like the next Collesseum, but it wasn't.


I'll agree with some of the posters, we NEED a game that is like the original RPG's put into the Wii.

I just don't want Wild Pokemon to appear as much, mainly because it takes a good deal of time to actually have your pokemon thrown out into the area in the 3d versions.
 

Firus

You know what? I am good.
BRoomer
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
7,681
NNID
OctagonalWalnut
3DS FC
0619-4291-4974
I actually thought BR was gonna be like the next Collesseum, but it wasn't.


I'll agree with some of the posters, we NEED a game that is like the original RPG's put into the Wii.

I just don't want Wild Pokemon to appear as much, mainly because it takes a good deal of time to actually have your pokemon thrown out into the area in the 3d versions.
Yeah, definitely.

You realize though, that PBR was such a lazily thrown-together game and Nintendo still managed to make money off of it, because so many of us thought it would be more than it was? I still say that it is WiiWare quality at best. $50 is ridiculous for that.
 

Overload

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
1,531
Location
RI
Something weird happened to me with this game. I used earthquake on my friend's skarmory, and it hit! Nobody used gravity, he didn't have iron ball on either. I was in the room with him and he was like what the ****! I tried it again and it didn't affect him that time. I still don't know why it hit though.
 

Ilex

Smash Ace
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
572
Location
Okotoks, Alberta, Canada
I really wish this game had mini-games, that is what keeps people playing. In fact two days ago I found my little sister and her friend playing Pokemon Stadium, just for the awesome mini games it had. It may not be the best that people are playing it for the mini games but if people are still playing them 8 years after the game was released then it must have been a good idea.
 

Firus

You know what? I am good.
BRoomer
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
7,681
NNID
OctagonalWalnut
3DS FC
0619-4291-4974
I really wish this game had mini-games, that is what keeps people playing. In fact two days ago I found my little sister and her friend playing Pokemon Stadium, just for the awesome mini games it had. It may not be the best that people are playing it for the mini games but if people are still playing them 8 years after the game was released then it must have been a good idea.
Yeah. In the case of the Pokemon games, I don't think Mini-game collections are a problem. If that's all that the game has, then it's a problem, but with the Pokemon games, they should've known people loved those mini-games.

What is it with Nintendo, though? It's like they're trying to erase the past. PBR could easily have been Stadium 3 -- so why did they change it to "Battle Revolution"? The Nintendo DS could've been the Gameboy DS -- so why did they change it? It's like they're trying to completely forget old Nintendo.

...But I digress. PBR was still missing more than that, I think. Look at Stadium -- it had 4 Cups with 4 difficulty levels on each. Then you had the Gym Leader Tower which was really great, and then Mewtwo -- and then once you do that, you moved on to do it all again. And the mini-games were still there. PBR has what, 10 Colosseums and once you go through them all half of them get new rules? And then you're left to customize your trainer or battle online.
 

Bowser King

Have It Your Way
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,737
Location
Ontario, Canada
Yeah. In the case of the Pokemon games, I don't think Mini-game collections are a problem. If that's all that the game has, then it's a problem, but with the Pokemon games, they should've known people loved those mini-games.

What is it with Nintendo, though? It's like they're trying to erase the past. PBR could easily have been Stadium 3 -- so why did they change it to "Battle Revolution"? The Nintendo DS could've been the Gameboy DS -- so why did they change it? It's like they're trying to completely forget old Nintendo.

...But I digress. PBR was still missing more than that, I think. Look at Stadium -- it had 4 Cups with 4 difficulty levels on each. Then you had the Gym Leader Tower which was really great, and then Mewtwo -- and then once you do that, you moved on to do it all again. And the mini-games were still there. PBR has what, 10 Colosseums and once you go through them all half of them get new rules? And then you're left to customize your trainer or battle online.
I personally find that the DS made a change for the better. Gamboy DS would never have been able to make the games we have now. Like AC:WW, MKDS, SM64. Unless you're trying to say a gamboy with DS graphics but again I would still prefer the DS. The 2nd screen isn't used for touch controls in a lot of games.
 

Firus

You know what? I am good.
BRoomer
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
7,681
NNID
OctagonalWalnut
3DS FC
0619-4291-4974
I personally find that the DS made a change for the better. Gamboy DS would never have been able to make the games we have now. Like AC:WW, MKDS, SM64. Unless you're trying to say a gamboy with DS graphics but again I would still prefer the DS. The 2nd screen isn't used for touch controls in a lot of games.
I'm not talking about anything except for the name. Why are they getting rid of Gameboy?
 

Firus

You know what? I am good.
BRoomer
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
7,681
NNID
OctagonalWalnut
3DS FC
0619-4291-4974
:lick: sorry about that. As for name...I don't know :p.
It's okay, I can see how that could've been interpreted differently from what I meant.
 
Top Bottom