wilderman2313
Smash Cadet
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2007
- Messages
- 52
no pokemen wernt really that great. and they would be to much like pichu or pikachu. so no
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I think I called it.I called it.
this wasnt intended to give support i was just trying to give an honest answerI think I called it.
thank you for your support though, seriously.
You think Sakurai cares about your specific opinions? He looks at this from a marketing view. Pichu was added in melee because of 3 reasons.Don't compare Pokemon Trainer with Plusle and Minum. Pokemon Trainer is a really unique idea that was maybe done (kind of) with Zelda/Sheik. It's a VERY unique idea, the idea of two Pikachu/Pichu clones working together like Ice Climber's just isn't as unique.
At least bring another type of Pokemon, you know? Pichu shouldn't be replaced with more electric rats!
I'm sorry, I don't follow.Pokemon Trainer is a really unique idea that was maybe done (kind of) with Zelda/Sheik.
Im just going to be blunt. You dont know what your talking about. Think about it more. your being DUMI just don't see what's so unique about them. Believe it or not I played Ruby, and when I saw Plusle or Minum whichever one it was I was like "Wait... what? Isn't that Pichu?" To say the least I was a bit saddened that they got that uncreative.
The plus and minus thing just doesn't seem like enough to me.
Grr if Sakurai puts them in. I say there are more deserving characters, even Pokemon more deserving that are popular as well.
I really hope Sakurai doesn't sink so low...
The first half of your post is the legitimate argument that I have to accept as the opposite side of my opinion. Some people do not believe that the differences between Plusle/Minun and Pichu/Pikachu are enough, and therefore do not see them as applicable characters for Brawl. That is understandable, as I disagree with some other characters. Your argument here is perfectly acceptable.I just don't see what's so unique about them. Believe it or not I played Ruby, and when I saw Plusle or Minum whichever one it was I was like "Wait... what? Isn't that Pichu?" To say the least I was a bit saddened that they got that uncreative.
The plus and minus thing just doesn't seem like enough to me.
Grr if Sakurai puts them in. I say there are more deserving characters, even Pokemon more deserving that are popular as well.
I really hope Sakurai doesn't sink so low...
Don't worry none of that post made sense. He says that they are not original because they steal from iceclimbers and look like pichu. PT steals from zelda/shiek and he says they are original.The first half of your post is the legitimate argument that I have to accept as the opposite side of my opinion. Some people do not believe that the differences between Plusle/Minun and Pichu/Pikachu are enough, and therefore do not see them as applicable characters for Brawl. That is understandable, as I disagree with some other characters. Your argument here is perfectly acceptable.
The second part of your post, which I have highlighted in bold, is what nuro had referred to as pig-headedness. If you can't see how, then I'm sorry but I will not explain.
There's more to it then "looking" like Pichu, my gosh they're even ELECTRIC types just like Pikachu and Pichu.Don't worry none of that post made sense. He says that they are not original because they steal from iceclimbers and look like pichu. PT steals from zelda/shiek and he says they are original.
Um... what? I was never "opposed" to the idea of the Pokemon Trainer, I just couldn't see it happening.There are so many of these types of people floating around but when the character appears in full fledged 3d on one of the updates they get giddy with joy. Im sorry but these types of people are just dumb.
You think that Pikachu will do more damage to squirtle with its electric attacks? I dont, types dont matter the characters never closely resembled their games enough anyway. And u say that stamina makes them unique but plus and minims different percentage game isnt unique? Ur still stuborn.Okay, yes I'm stubborn, I'll say that.
There's more to it then "looking" like Pichu, my gosh they're even ELECTRIC types just like Pikachu and Pichu.
I'll give it to you, that is my opinion. I want variety. They just don't provide it no matters what way I look at it. They're too similar.
Perhaps PT will play out differently then Zelda/Sheik. I actually firmly believe he will. They've already said that they Pokemon will have "stamina" therefore separating PT from Zelda/Sheik. Still it's the truth that we don't know how this will work out.
Um... what? I was never "opposed" to the idea of the Pokemon Trainer, I just couldn't see it happening.
O.o ..........
kk....WHY did this thread have to come back!!!! I thought it was gone, and we had seen the last of this madness......but no.....I must retourn to flame.....again....
I swear, I am so annoyed seeing these "ash for brawl" or " red for brawl", "blue for brawl" , "insert colour here for brawl" threads/posts.....they have got to be some of thee stupidest, agonizing, childish, pointless ideas I will ever consider responding to....
Whoever thinks, that out of the overly large selection of 400+ pokemon there are, that a TRAINER will be playable in brawl is DEAD wrong, and possible some of the saddest "fanboys" I have ever heard from......and many others have heard from aswell.....and I'm 100% sure what I'm about to argue, MUST have been said before, because it scares me to think there are no sane people who would have already mentioned this.
first off.....so many of these posted movesets for ...(I'll just go with red) Red, involve summoning pokemon for certain attacks.....hmmmm.....seems logical, and a good idea for gameplay to add to smash..........................................................................................
THAT'S WHY THE POKEBALL IS A FREAKING ITEM!!!!!! SO ANY CHARACTER CAN THROW ONE, AND A POKEMON APEARS!!!!!! ANY character can throw a pokeball, ANY, so how origional would it be to just be able to do that for "Red's"moves? Pretty dull......
Second....Red is not popular.....infact he's MAJORLY UNPOPULAR.....like....go to any random person....say the word "Pokemon" and what comes to mind? Well, probably things like Pickachu, Mewtwo, Meowth....because they are ACTUAL POKEMON!.....NOBODY, will ever think of "Red".....WHY, because it's just a name...a POSIBLE naem at that......it is a character, who really has no character (he just walks.....he dosn't talk- he has no personality- he dosn't battle, he let's his pokemon do that) If there's is going to be any character representing the "POKEMON" series, then wouldn't it be logical that it would be an actual "POKEMON" !!!!!.....you know....HENCE THE NAME POKEMON!
Thirdly- Now, other movesets i've seen have included moves such as punching and kicking....which brings me to another point.....WHY WOULD RED ACTUALLY BE FIGHTING?!?!? I mean.....that's kinda the point of being a pokemon trainer....YOU DO NOT FIGHT! YOU LET YOUR "POKEMON" FIGHT! YOU TEST YOUR "POKEMON'S" STRENGTH IN BATTLE! NOT YOUR OWN! so WHY! would Red actually be fighting, and getting hit? HE WOULDN'T WHEN THE TRAINER'S FREAKING BATTLE, THEY DO SO WITH .....POKEMON!!! NOT THEMSELVES!........Even at the begining of each frickon game.....the "Professer" always says the same stupid thing "oh, don't step in the grass, you might be attacked, you need to have pokemon to battle with first" ........ why would he say this, unless the trainers could f'n fight for themselves......
Red WOULD NOT IN THE LEAST BE ANY FORM OF "GOOD" REPRESENTATION FOR BRAWL! If there will be representation for "Pokemon" it WILL BE A "POKEMON" why? BECAUSE THE GAME IS ABOUT """POKEMON"""! He would also be bad representation, because when poeple see him/play as him, they will think it is so incredible lame & unbearably stupid, the Pokemon franchise would be leaving a bad image for itself
so there, once again I had to respond to this POS idea of trainers in brawl....and, As Iv'e said on other "Red flamming occasions" ( a fellow smasher once said) " unless he is the alternate costume for the sandbag in the homerun contest, then there is NO good reason for him to be in Brawl" ....
PS: It's not often I make longer posts about things, because I am somewhat of a dyslexic (though I think i've come quite a long way, I DO try to catch my errors, and have become fairly good with a keyboard).....so if anyone tries to BS my points due to my spelling errors, then A: your getting personal, and B: It's a lousy excuse in the first place
No, I don't think that Pikachu would do more damage to Squirtle, I just like a variety, that's all. I'd rather see another type in the game, but as I said that's my opinion.You think that Pikachu will do more damage to squirtle with its electric attacks? I dont, types dont matter the characters never closely resembled their games enough anyway. And u say that stamina makes them unique but plus and minims different percentage game isnt unique? Ur still stuborn.
I get what ur saying but something still dont make sense. This is pretty much all ur opinions ill just tell u what i think sakurai will be thinking.No, I don't think that Pikachu would do more damage to Squirtle, I just like a variety, that's all. I'd rather see another type in the game, but as I said that's my opinion.
Stamina seems more interesting to me, I guess. Supposedly it'll force you to switch out the Pokemon from time to time, which is what makes it so different from Zelda/Sheik.
Also I don't think "clones" like Pichu need to be "replaced", they where put in because there wasn't much time to create unique characters, right?
Do you mean horrible replacement? We don't need anymore Pokemon in the game that resemble Pikachu. Just end the madness at Pokemon Trainer.Well pichus out so they would be great replacements. Or mabey they can be assist trohpies.
Pichu is out?Well pichus out so they would be great replacements. Or mabey they can be assist trohpies.
Pichu is out?
Besides the fact that he's a "clone" of Pikachu, why else would he be out? Being original isn't a necessity to be included. If anything, you could expect the differences between Pikachu and Pichu to greaten, but that doesn't necessarily mean that Pichu is out of the game.
While he's not confirmed to be out, you can't possibly think they'd keep Pichu in the game? Him and Doctor Mario make up the epitome of clone and I don't see a way that could make him unique enough to consider keeping him over some other characters.
Oh, I guess because 'bored' said it, it must be true.Worst character duo ever....
well, this person loves you for bumping this.well sonics in and game not coming out for 4 more months they could do this... it would be hella fun for reals.
so far all the characters i want in are in the game i just want 3 more. Pluse and Minun, Geno, Captain O.
lol people are gunna hate me for bumping this
They never actually said the pokemon where from a ball. Could be a stage thing. IDK but I don't see them putting a Pika like in a ball.Then how? My only other guess (besides a lame spontaneous appearance of one of the two Pokémon) is that one of the two came out from the Poké Ball, while the other one just appeared flying from one side of the stage or something.
Not sure if they were Latios and Latias, anyway. I'm talking about this review, if anyone here knows about it. Of course Latios and Latias should appear in the game since they are legendary, and maybe they are using this method only for them... But what about Plusle and Minun?