dy831532sssfjhhggb2224523
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,296
I was craving some good ol' Ike discussion, so I figured I'd open a thread.
Matchups with the cast:
I feel like he does relatively well against the game's top characters. Like in Brawl where he had slightly disadvantaged matchups against the top end of the cast, but Meta Knight utterly destroyed him in their matchup. Since Meta Knight doesn't have an extreme edge over Ike here, I feel Ike's worst matchup is now Sheik, but even that matchup seems like a 60/40 or 65/35 at worst in my experience.
Mostly, I feel that he's more even with a lot of top/high characters rather than slightly disadvantaged like in Brawl. There's just a few that I feel a slight disadvantage from.
He has trouble with campy players using characters who excel at it, so I feel those matchups are bad for Ike, but not too bad.
It doesn't feel like Ike has any unwinnables, even Sheik mains haven't made me feel it. This makes me think that Ike's a lot better than people give him credit for. Solo Ike or backing him up with a secondary seems highly viable for tournament, I've done both successfully over wifi tournaments since October, managing a 1st here and there.
Stages:
What do you feel Ike's best stages are in both the 3DS and Wii U?
My opinions:
3DS:
Final Destination: Bad.
Battlefield: Good.
Yoshi's: Unsure, leaning towards even/slightly good.
Ferox: Good, probably Ike's best 3DS stage despite how I feel about FD.
Prism Tower: Average or slightly good, I'm unsure.
Wii U:
Final Destination: Bad.
Battlefield: Good.
Delfino: Still really good.
Kongo: Unsure. Probably bad.
Skyloft: Unsure. Probably good since it's similar to Delfino, or just average.
Lylat: Slightly good.
Castle Siege: Average or slightly bad.
Town and City: Bad or average.
Smashville: Slightly good.
Wuhu: Good.
Halberd: Great.
Comparison to the cast:
I think Ike is a solid upper-mid tier, borderline between high and upper-mid, or at least close. I've asked players like NAKAT their opinions on Ike in Smash 4, and they usually say "in the 30's." After seeing some good Ikes while taking notes on what they do to bend over some of the best characters, and utilizing him pretty well in a variety of matchups and against a few top players and a lot of other players, I feel like he's one of the better characters in the game, instead of being in the bottom half. Not the best, but still one of the better characters. If you put work into Ike, there's really nothing stopping a good Ike main from making it to the top. It feels like he has to put in a lot of work to be as efficient as some of the best characters, but it doesn't mean he's very limited. That's why I think he's a solid upper-mid near high. I want to see more Ike mains tear through brackets, since I know Ike has the potential to.
Where would you place him compared to the cast?
Any other input? I couldn't think of anything else to throw here since I have to go to work soon, and this is already a lot to read.
Matchups with the cast:
I feel like he does relatively well against the game's top characters. Like in Brawl where he had slightly disadvantaged matchups against the top end of the cast, but Meta Knight utterly destroyed him in their matchup. Since Meta Knight doesn't have an extreme edge over Ike here, I feel Ike's worst matchup is now Sheik, but even that matchup seems like a 60/40 or 65/35 at worst in my experience.
Mostly, I feel that he's more even with a lot of top/high characters rather than slightly disadvantaged like in Brawl. There's just a few that I feel a slight disadvantage from.
He has trouble with campy players using characters who excel at it, so I feel those matchups are bad for Ike, but not too bad.
It doesn't feel like Ike has any unwinnables, even Sheik mains haven't made me feel it. This makes me think that Ike's a lot better than people give him credit for. Solo Ike or backing him up with a secondary seems highly viable for tournament, I've done both successfully over wifi tournaments since October, managing a 1st here and there.
Stages:
What do you feel Ike's best stages are in both the 3DS and Wii U?
My opinions:
3DS:
Final Destination: Bad.
Battlefield: Good.
Yoshi's: Unsure, leaning towards even/slightly good.
Ferox: Good, probably Ike's best 3DS stage despite how I feel about FD.
Prism Tower: Average or slightly good, I'm unsure.
Wii U:
Final Destination: Bad.
Battlefield: Good.
Delfino: Still really good.
Kongo: Unsure. Probably bad.
Skyloft: Unsure. Probably good since it's similar to Delfino, or just average.
Lylat: Slightly good.
Castle Siege: Average or slightly bad.
Town and City: Bad or average.
Smashville: Slightly good.
Wuhu: Good.
Halberd: Great.
Comparison to the cast:
I think Ike is a solid upper-mid tier, borderline between high and upper-mid, or at least close. I've asked players like NAKAT their opinions on Ike in Smash 4, and they usually say "in the 30's." After seeing some good Ikes while taking notes on what they do to bend over some of the best characters, and utilizing him pretty well in a variety of matchups and against a few top players and a lot of other players, I feel like he's one of the better characters in the game, instead of being in the bottom half. Not the best, but still one of the better characters. If you put work into Ike, there's really nothing stopping a good Ike main from making it to the top. It feels like he has to put in a lot of work to be as efficient as some of the best characters, but it doesn't mean he's very limited. That's why I think he's a solid upper-mid near high. I want to see more Ike mains tear through brackets, since I know Ike has the potential to.
Where would you place him compared to the cast?
Any other input? I couldn't think of anything else to throw here since I have to go to work soon, and this is already a lot to read.
Last edited: