Silent_Jester
Smash Journeyman
oh... yeah don't mind us. Just practicing our ub3r 1337 debating skills. We kinda invaded the topic's direction
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
lol.But I think you still assume you're right on this,simply because you study it in highschool or whatever.
Don't care, basically ad hominem anyway.That doesn't make you right, nor does your opinion being yours make you right instantly. You come of as having a pretty large ego, to me.
Get this through your head. I NEVER said you had to be muscle bound or overtly "masculine."Not all women want a muscle bound man.
The amount of relationships I've been in is completely irrelevant to me knowing what women want. Which, by the way, I do. I know what everyone wants.You still talk like you know what women want, even if you may have only been in 6 relationships. That doesn't count as the whole human race.
Another stunning rebuttal.While they do all work on the same psychological basis, I still say personality affects how this works greatly. I can't prove this, it's just what I think.
I know all this stuff.Just like you think all that stuff.
You really need to read what I write more thoroughly.And yes, those things ARE based on personality. If they weren't, we would all eat the same food, drive the same car, and love the same person.
What the hell are you talking about? I don't think you even remember what you initially said here. Here it is.That's a stupid thing to say. Now I can just reply with
"I didn't say you could do that, lulz"
And then you will rebutt with the same thing. Screw this part.
Neither did I, as I already said. You bringing this up is completely irrelevant and does nothing for your seriously lacking argument.You can't waltz in, proclaim yourself awesome because you have big abs, then walk out with every girl behind you.
Care to point out what I'm blindly assuming about you?You're blindy assuming things also.
LOLAs Eaor said, you seem to have read "The game" and now you sound like you know all.
You are, I'm not. You're blindly assuming negative things about me. I have not done this to you. Have you forgotten the context in which the word "assuming" was used already?We're both assuming.
There is no proof for anything.Don't you get it? You have no proof you are right. Neither do I. You get up and say "UR WRONGZ!" and I get up and say "NO U AREZ!". We are both in the same frame of mind, only with different opionions of the subject at hand.
No, their personality does not affect the psychology that determines the BASIC requirements for a good relationship partner. Yes, their personality is going to dictate the PERSONALITY of the other man that they want, but I have not said a word about changing the person's personality or anything outside of BASIC attraction at all this thread. Is it time that I explain basic attraction in more detail?You said that before, and it's prolly true. But as I said before, personality affects this greatly.
No I'm not. Don't try and warp reality. You have failed to provide any solid rebuttal in this "debate," and I'm calling you out on it.GOOD REBUTTLE REBUTTLE! Again, you're trying to take the conversation into a silly flame war. Screw this part too.
No he didn't. Quote him at this moment of "turning it down" you speak of. It never happened.He turend down your advice, as did Eaor, and Jester, and I.
Blindly assuming the negative, red herring, ad hominem, bandwagon fallacy, blah blah blah.. do you have nothing else?I think one guy agreed with you, but I think it shows maybe you're thoughts are slightly...kinda lame really. I find them all very ego tastic and vain.
Why should I do that if you haven't proven it to me?You don't want to accept what I think is true?
Point out to me when I said that. I'd really like to see this.You keep mentioning things like you're the only person who knows anything here,
Well, obviously you're wrong because you don't agree with me, because I'm right.and claime we are all wrong because we don't agree with YOU.
Wow. Think abou the implications of what you just said.Get over yourself, and try to have a more open view.
I'm willing to try some of your tactics, and have agreed on some, but you seem to think only in one dogmatic line.
lolThat's pretty low, to get up and say "Women can't think for themselves"
Okay, I don't know WHY I should give you this much credit, but I'm going to assume you know what a generalization is.What about the leaders that are female? What about the stats that suggest women are better drivers than men? Doesn't that sway your thoughts that women are lesser people? I think they're better than us males, in many ways.
You are sorry, that's for sure.I didn't pick up your insult, and I'm sorry for that.
You really don't understand how this works. If you're going to just throw away the moments where you know that you're defeated, I'm not even going to bother with you anymore.And AGAIN with the mindless and endless "Your made that analogy!" "you made one after!" "Fine I'll make another!"
Screw this part of the argument also.
Don't care. We're done here, and I couldn't care less about your continual blind assumptions and silly opinions.I'm not saying I'm right, and I'm not saying that everything you say is wrong, just that your basic veiw seems vain and based on 3 years of life experiance.
I'm aware that I'm hardly owning anyone in this debate, but I don't feel you are either.
why do you do this?1337marth, I'm sorry to break it to you, but you really don't love her. You're just tricking yourself into thinking you do. That's why you're abusing the ellipses at the end of your self affirmations of your own love. To try and hint to us that you're not completely confident in the fact that you love her.
What do you think love is?
I love her because i know it when I am arround her and when I hug her and everything, I love her1337marth, prove you're right and that you truly believe it. You know you don't, and I know you don't. Jester knows you don't, Blackadder knows you don't.
Look man, it's OKAY to not be in love, or to find out that you were never in love in the first place. The first step towards fixing the problem is admitting you have one.
Er, ****, double post :x I figured someone would post before I did again.
I can give the advice from experience. 3 years wasted; that's some BS experience.lol, dude, if you've been trying to get her for a year, than give up. like honestly, if she won't go out with you, than get over her. not easy, but, well, it has to be done...
You know what EVERYONE wants do you? You have serious ego troubles.The amount of relationships I've been in is completely irrelevant to me knowing what women want. Which, by the way, I do. I know what everyone wants.
p s y c h o l o g y
I'm sure you do. I'm very sure you do. All 19 year olds know everything, obviously.I know all this stuff.
That I was a...what was it? An ACF?Care to point out what I'm blindly assuming about you?
If there is no proof for anything, how can you have psychological prowess to back you up?There is no proof for anything.
Yes, of course we're just going back and forth with who is right and who isn't. Because YOU have failed to actually provide a logical counter to the original material here. My first post. Until you can defer from your current track, this, of course, will go nowhere. I have psychological prowess backing me up, and you have already stated that you have nothing. To quote you, "I can't prove this, it's just what I think."
Welcome to ego down again, people.Well, obviously you're wrong because you don't agree with me, because I'm right.
I feel sorry for you, in that you assume that women are nothing but blank boards of Alpha male loving inferior idiots. *Thumbs up*Okay, I don't know WHY I should give you this much credit, but I'm going to assume you know what a generalization is.
OBVIOUSLY things exist which contradict the norm. But at any given level, there is LARGELY more of the norm than that which contradicts the norm so much that the contradiction isn't even worth considering. I've never heard of stats that suggest that women are better drivers, and even if there were, it's for one thing irrelevant and also very susceptible to statistical inaccuracy, bias, and other things. Get on wikipedia and look up logical fallacies. I'm not saying that women are inferior. You're taking it that way because you're getting all riled up about my advice to 1337marth.
The fact that you think women are better than males in many ways tells me bad things about you. But that doesn't exactly matter. I just feel sorry for you.
Yes, we are done here. You are hardly worth anyones time, and I advise everyone to take the advice CK. Be friends with her. Best advice there is to it. You don't think I'm wroth arguing with, and I feel the same about you.Don't care. We're done here, and I couldn't care less about your continual blind assumptions and silly opinions.
I wasn't trying to provoke you there, I was just trying to get in my final say in that. Maybe we have no negative assumptions, but I can't help but feel you often took stabs a the other people here's intelligence, and that isn't exactly fair debating. I don't really hold anything against you, as I assume you don't at me. We got in a heated debate, as we both feel strongly about our points. If we did, we would have ended up flamming.Look Blackadder, you're just trying to provoke me further. But I have to point out one thing that is not valid to the discussion, so at least I can feel alright about it. It involves your intelligence and reading comprehension.
Here's how the exchange went. This is to help you understand your misconception of the "blind assumption" deal.
You said I was similar to Dr. Phil. You didn't call me Dr. Phil. I understood this, saw how silly it was, and said you are similar to an AFC. I did not blindly assume that you are an AFC. I pulled the same card you did in a different way. It's a method of smartly turning your own failure around on you so that it's obvious to you. As it stands, I have not made any negative assumptions about you.
Heh, I was wating for you to come FDV. I assumed after you saw us all go at each other on the other romance thread you would find us on this one.Kiddies, you're not playing nice. Don't make me close this.
lol, but we are good no killing yet, but I love her.Heh, I was wating for you to come FDV. I assumed after you saw us all go at each other on the other romance thread you would find us on this one.
I ASSUME it's over now.
M I RITE >_>
What is that suppose to mean?Well find out if you really do. Only time knows.
Told you......>_>1337 might actually be on to something there. Thats how I feel about her...
Whip your s*** out. Works like a charmI love this girl, but she says I only like you as a friend what should I do?
So true. I think somehow that happened to me. I don't remember being so cold to everything when I was younger, but now even 3 local tragedies, each in quick session after the other aren't enough to have much of an effect.Love is blind. She's just going to end up saying "I love you more than the world, but I met this guy..."
Don't give your heart, or you won't ever have one again.