Christ bloke, I'm not trying to start an argument, I'm trying to have a civilized discussion. You targeted me in the first place, I have no reason to sit here and make this big of a fuss about a
game. I call it as I see it, a fit is a fit. Or rather, a
rant.
I'm edgy today, have a lot of time on my hands, and you seem to not have gotten the point: bring it.
Again, I'm not arguing with anyone, if you're "edgy" then that's your issue.
All those characters never appeared in the game once their fate was sealed. In this case it's more than a situation of having him change his mind, it's asking the development staff to throw away work they did to re-start a much more tenuous task just because you couldn't deal with it (general you btw, I'm addressing the mentality as a whole ... I don't need to make it personal, I go straight for the gut of the argument.)
Talk about missing the point.
Toss away their work on Takamaru? You don't say, just like they tossed away the work on three playable characters, which take far more effort to make than a simple assist trophy? No, they were not in the final game, but they did
work on them.
Pet peeve I hadn't gotten to express before, yes need. Also, if that was the point then articulate "super luigi shows that nintendo does know about DLC!" Then it would make more sense.
Please excuse me for not articulating myself in your specific dialect so that you understand correctly, it made sense to me.
Little Mac did get the promotion ... an iteration of the game later. That's a poor comparison.
Respecting someone's work means accepting it and seeing the value in their decisions, not asking them to flip flop to fit your desire. The whole "DLC can change this!" mentality is, as I see it, disrespecting the quality of his decisions and putting into question the whole decision process behind the roster. Not to mention being inconsiderate of the sheer amount of time it takes to make these games, time which you're asking them to literally throw away.
As I said, DLC was not feasible for Brawl, DLC is now a thing that
is feasible, now
that's a poor comparison.
You can respect someone's work and be a critic at the same time, that's how the 'produce -> consumer' relationship works, when you're making a product that you expect people to buy, you'd do best to listen to feedback. Games can be a form of art in ways, but it's not like I'm looking at a painting in a museum, this is a product that I spend money on. I'm not being inconsiderate, they didn't spend
all of their development time on Takamaru's
assist trophy. I'm not asking the construction crew to tear the house down, I'm asking them to add a closet to a room, so to speak. You're taking things to the extreme when they aren't.
Again, Pit's growth from trophy to playable character happened an iteration of the game later.
You're not asking for Takamaru to be considered for the next smash, you're asking for them to get rid of the work they did on the assist trophy and make him a character instead. Completely different story. Sakurai or not.
As technology grows, different things are made possible. The GameCube and the Wii did not have DLC, the Wii U does, and that's a point that I believe
you to be missing. Yes, Mac became playable in the next game, but there was the conscious decision of "people really wanted him to be playable, perhaps we should make that happen now," which would possibly happen again with Takamaru in the next game. However, this time there's the alternate option of DLC, I'm not saying Sakurai needs to churn it out as soon as the game comes out, but maybe say he decides to do a poll to see the top three characters people want added as DLC. It's just the best thing to do for supporters to get together on the idea beforehand, so Takamaru doesn't end up at the bottom of such a poll. Mind you, this is all speculatively speaking.
Except Takamaru in Smash was sadly already deconfirmed. The K. Rool campaigning makes sense because we still have no knowledge of his fate and if he wasn't considered for the game he could qualify for DLC. With Takamaru we know he was considered and added as an AT. That story is over.
I brought up K. Rool because I want to see him return to his franchise, which is what was singled out in the quote. If King K. Rool gets in Smash, the chances of him joining his own franchise goes up. If Takamaru were playable, he could get the exact same treatment as Pit got with Brawl and Uprising. I was only making a comparison.
Oh, be greedy or w.e., that's not my problem. My problem, again, is the fact the character was already deconfirmed and people still insist on it. Not so much greedy as just overall lacking in class and honor of any sort.
And how did it strengthen your point? I cannot begin to grasp how you concluded that.
Apparently we can't ask for more with our DLC, which is what DLC was made for, which was my point.
I'm not insisting on anything, I'm not saying "oh Sakurai, stop what your doing and delay development to change Takamaru to a playable character!" I'm saying "hey Sakurai, the game is great and I love that Takamaru is there at all, but if the possibility ever comes up, he'd be a great candidate to make the jump to playable in DLC." The words you have, keep them from my mouth.
Just because I voice my opinion strongly doesn't mean I'm all up in war or getting upset. You proposed something and I strongly disagreed so I decided to voice my opinion. Your previous response wasn't satisfactory, so I decided to go to town on that. The next response isn't satisfactory, so I'm going to town on it now.
Well yeah, I can voice my opinion just as much as you can. The general tone I'm getting is one from an upset person, however.
Particularly considering that you're "edgy," apparently.
It's an argument, and that's how they go, and this is how I do it. I'm satisfied with my responses and am still pretty certain I have a reasonable point of view.
Don't agree with it? At least have enough respect to treat it like a valuable opinion and disagree, instead of acting like it's someone's hissy fit.
I do have respect for your opinion, but you apparently don't respect mine, and that's where the problem lies. I'm not going to argue with you, as I only responded before because you quoted my post. If you want to pick a fight then you can find someone else.