For me Daisy was a wasted spot and should have been unique or they could have stuck with her being
an alt costume
an alt costume
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
There's really nothing to work with for Daisy, unless you go spinoff fully, which are things Smash tends to ignore anyway. Daisy got what Daisy was worth.For me Daisy was a wasted spot and should have been unique or they could have stuck with her being
an alt costume
if that was true she would have disappeared from realityDaisy got what Daisy was worth.
Well, Smash is no stranger to making things up when necessary, and I feel like Daisy could've been a unique Echo Fighter just by being a version of Peach for beginners. Considering Peach is one of the most complicated, but also one of the most popular, characters in the game, Daisy could've functioned as a version of her meant for beginners. I think that would've been more than enough to make her unique and warrant her inclusion.There's really nothing to work with for Daisy, unless you go spinoff fully, which are things Smash tends to ignore anyway. Daisy got what Daisy was worth.
At the very least, Flower Bomber should've been her side special, along with other changes.For me Daisy was a wasted spot and should have been unique or they could have stuck with her being
an alt costume
Maybe. But poor Toad didn't. Especially the blue one.Daisy got what Daisy was worth.
Now you say that, yes I could agree with this. I basically said the same in my earlier post. Daisy could be like Peach but no floating? Would certainly take some technical stuff from Peach. Maybe make her stronger on the ground as trade-off.Well, Smash is no stranger to making things up when necessary, and I feel like Daisy could've been a unique Echo Fighter just by being a version of Peach for beginners. Considering Peach is one of the most complicated, but also one of the most popular, characters in the game, Daisy could've functioned as a version of her meant for beginners. I think that would've been more than enough to make her unique and warrant her inclusion.
Well, yeah, part of their point in adding the Echo fighters (and clones in general) is bringing in characters that otherwise wouldn't make it. The reality is that there are just not that many good candidates, at least not as many as some people would purport. And by "good candidates" I mean characters where both (1) the character can be well-represented as an Echo and (2) that character actually has enough merit to justify the effort.But if they're smart about it, Echo Fighters could bring way more characters to the roster that otherwise wouldn't make it, and if they follow the example of Ken and Chrom, the uniqueness of these characters is worth it.
Sure not every Echo warrants this, Daisy is perfect the way she is for example, and Simon and Richter have a composite moveset (which is smart), but I don't expect their return anyways.
Chrom and Lucina especially are very great Echo Fighters, because they are without the tipper mechanic of their base characters, Chrom was a unique Recovery, and they're both hugely popular. That's enough reason to keep them I feel. And this opens up way to play a character for people who think they're too technical.
If they could take Echo Fighters a step further and make them more like Ken, Chrom, Isabelle or the Melee clones, that would be an amazing way to cover the losses of the inevitable cuts next game, and am down for it.
We could declone them, sure. I'd personally make Chrom and Lucina fall under one character, have them Echo each other as they already have the same class in Awakening anyway. Rebrand them to be the Marth semi clone, if there's room for Roy to be a clone of them, add him back in too (even if he has just one unique move, the Flare Blade).Well, yeah, part of their point in adding the Echo fighters (and clones in general) is bringing in characters that otherwise wouldn't make it. The reality is that there are just not that many good candidates, at least not as many as some people would purport. And by "good candidates" I mean characters where both (1) the character can be well-represented as an Echo and (2) that character actually has enough merit to justify the effort.
To reiterate, you see me support clonings in the cases where I think they're warranted; I just only see a limited number of those cases.
--
I also actually disagree with those saying that the removal of the tipper made for a succesful Echoing. Marth's tipper is one of the most subtly amazing aspects of that moveset's ability to represent FE in Smash, as FE is all about positioning your units at just the right distance from the enemy forces in order to tilt the advantage in your favor. Lucina as an easier-to-play version of the moveset takes too much attention away from the original concept of Marth in Smash.
And as I said before, Lucina and Chrom have merits but those have to be balanced against the bigger-picture roster construction, like whether we should be adding three one-offs who are all from the same game in a roster with the scope of Smash's.
--
Decloning Echoes I already addressed; I think whether it is worth it depends heavily on the character. At every step of the decloning process you have to ask yourself why you're doing all that you're doing for a character whose whole premise was being low-effort.
I agree that the "effort" should require an initial decision to either introduce (Lucina, Ken), "upgrade" (Roy), "promote" (Dark Samus, Peach) etc which definitely takes into account the resources in hand and what will need development.... I think whether it is worth it depends heavily on the character. At every step of the decloning process you have to ask yourself why you're doing all that you're doing for a character whose whole premise was being low-effort.
Sure not every Echo warrants this, Daisy is perfect the way she is for example, and Simon and Richter have a composite moveset (which is smart), but I don't expect their return anyways.
Alph not being an echo was ultimate's biggest failingwell as we're on the subject of echoes why doesn't everyone list the echoes you'd like to see as we've done with out at promotions and fe revamps
gooigi (luigi)
octoling (inkling)
digby (isabelle)
toadette (if toad gets in)
alph (olimar)
ninjara (min min)
roll (mega man)
roxas (sora)
Wool yoshi (yoshi)
well roll had a small support thread and we floated around the idea of her being a clone cause she was on in the first mvcAlph not being an echo was ultimate's biggest failing
Also Echo Roll over Proto Man or Bass? That's new.
Anyway:
Lakitu (Bowser Jr.)
Lord Fredrik (King K. Rool)
Panther (Wolf)
Paula (Ness)
Alph (Olimar)
Medusa (Palutena)
On that topic, i want an echo fighter from 2 different characters in one moveset.Shadow as a combo Echo of Sonic and Mewtwo, sure.
Chrom, sort of?On that topic, i want an echo fighter from 2 different characters in one moveset.
inb4 Bowsette.
This was an idea of mine too. Works perfectly, take the Fire spells from Robin too, and maybe even Zelda's Din's Fire, and she's good to go.My earlier post had a Celica moveset; basically, my idea for her was a Robin Echo who takes moves from Robin, Marth and Roy all in one character.
Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of this.This was an idea of mine too. Works perfectly, take the Fire spells from Robin too, and maybe even Zelda's Din's Fire, and she's good to go.
Well this is the fanbase that goes nuts over directs.I'm still blown away by how easy it was to win over this fanbase with clones by just calling them echoes.
Y'all must be putty in the hands of good salespeople, lol.
Hmmm…I can’t think of who it was but I could have sworn I’ve seen someone bring up Zoroark and Hisuian Zoroark as potential Smash characters a few times around here.In other news:
Remember the post-Brawl/pre-Smash 4 times, when people thought Zoroark was gonna happen?In other news:
Unlike some people, I never had this seething hatred for clones. If anything, I embrace them. People tend to have this unrealistic expectation of clones stealing slots, when they take substantially less work. I swear a large part of this vendetta against clones that some people used to have came from that sort of view. In smash 4 for instance, the alternative to having Lucina and Dark pit was not getting your most wanted dream pick in the game: it was not getting Lucina and dark pit. I feel as well that the larger the roster gets and the game gets, the less controversial clones become. The lingering hatred for clones emerged in a post melee environment, when 6/13 newcomers were clones in some way shape or form. Nowadays, when you have such a large, diverse roster, a few last minute clones on top is not the end of the world. It also helps that with Ultimate bringing in so many people, clones don’t have that same stigma they had in the old days.I'm still blown away by how easy it was to win over this fanbase with clones by just calling them echoes.
Y'all must be putty in the hands of good salespeople, lol.
Poor thing got saddled with the whole 'Lucario is getting replaced' theory. It would've honestly had been a cool Pokemon to get, but the reputation it had made it so that when Gen 6 happened and Lucario returned its support collapsed and it had to rebuild.Remember the post-Brawl/pre-Smash 4 times, when people thought Zoroark was gonna happen?
God I miss those times.
Directs are effectively a procession of commercials, but I can understand getting hyped by the prospect of new games getting announced.Well this is the fanbase that goes nuts over directs.
I don't hate clones, I just have a general apathy towards them. I don't resent them being there, it's not like you can trade a clone for an original character, but I don't really care about roster padding.Unlike some people, I never had this seething hatred for clones. If anything, I embrace them. People tend to have this unrealistic expectation of clones stealing slots, when they take substantially less work. I swear a large part of this vendetta against clones that some people used to have came from that sort of view. In smash 4 for instance, the alternative to having Lucina and Dark pit was not getting your most wanted dream pick in the game: it was not getting Lucina and dark pit. I feel as well that the larger the roster gets and the game gets, the less controversial clones become. The lingering hatred for clones emerged in a post melee environment, when 6/13 newcomers were clones in some way shape or form. Nowadays, when you have such a large, diverse roster, a few last minute clones on top is not the end of the world. It also helps that with Ultimate bringing in so many people, clones don’t have that same stigma they had in the old days.
If a clone is done right, like a Melee Falco or an Ultimate Lucina, Chrom, or Ken, they are awesome additions. I love seeing the subtle differences that make the kit mesh differently.If anything, I wish they would go further with the echo concept in the future. Obviously I want more Chroms and less Daisys if that makes sense, but honestly simple small tweeks, even if it is just sharing a move with a different fighter like with Chrom, goes a long way. I’d love to see a Shadow echo fighter with a Mewtwo Up B for instance.
I mean 100% Accurate Dark Samus would be Timeout the Character just because of how Prime Bosses function, let alone Ultimate Online. Let’s just say that Dark Samus as an Echo the first go-around is probably a blessing in disguise.I'm fine with clones/semi-clones/echoes/whatever as long as it makes sense for the character to be a clone and it makes sense what extent they are being made a clone.
Ken and Lucina would be good examples of clones while Dark Samus and ganondorf would be bad examples of clones.
It absolutely is branding considering it was retroactively applied to two existing model-swap characters who debuted prior to the distinction manifesting. Ultimate was just when the term was devised and the option to stack them added. Before then, they were just called clones.Calling it a branding is misleading. It's an all new type of Modal-Swap Fighter(Sakurai doesn't use the term clone either. He's applied this to characters who can be clones or semi-clones too. Which includes Wolf and Isabelle). Basically, Echo is another kind of Model-Swap Fighter, not a rebranding by any means. Clone is a fanterm, which isn't a bad one either, but it doesn't actually correctly understand the development of the Model-Swap Fighters either.
Echo Fighter are much more strict by requiring the same core bodyshape. Something Isabelle couldn't have, as she's still a Model-Swap Fighter but not an Echo. The only other consistent thing is they always match the original weight of the character.(which, to be frank, is something that could easily change come the next game). Dr. Mario is the only one of the Model-Swap Fighters to share this trait, though(though they are slightly different in the PAL version of Melee, so not entirely. Which does make it kind of funny how he's the closest to an Echo, yet the only one who actually would be just different enough if weight were a legitimate requirement and not just a guess. Luigi also used to have the same weight as Mario but diverged pretty fast. Villager and Isabelle never had the same weight nor were that close either).
It would be great retro rep just like but smash ultimate skipped having new retro rep also the fact that pro wrestling rep can be 6 characters in one just like Koopalings which is why I see them as a better wrestler representation compared toBecause as divisive as he may be, Incineroar is infinitely more popular and notable than anyone from Pro Wrestling.
Pro Wrestling is not a well remembered game.
That's not how it actually works.It absolutely is branding considering it was retroactively applied to two existing model-swap characters who debuted prior to the distinction manifesting. Ultimate was just when the term was devised and the option to stack them added. Before then, they were just called clones.
I will say that not all clones are echoes, but all echoes are clones. Clones is an umbrella term for characters that use another as the foundation for the moveset. They can deviate therein, and there are different gradation of clones, whether direct or semi. Some echoes are direct clones, some aren't. And then there's Wolf, who is probably the closest to "original" on the spectrum of derivative characters, but isn't actually original.
But echoes absolutely fall under the banner of clone, and that subset was simply given a new label. And that decision succeeded wildly.
I mean, Incineroar isn't added to represent wrestling as a sport any more than Marth is added to represent fencing.It would be great retro rep just like but smash ultimate skipped having new retro rep also the fact that pro wrestling rep can be 6 characters in one just like Koopalings which is why I see them as a better wrestler representation compared to
meHmmm…I can’t think of who it was but I could have sworn I’ve seen someone bring up Zoroark and Hisuian Zoroark as potential Smash characters a few times around here.
Had Gen 6 not creeped up at the opportune time, I think we would've had something from Gen 5, Zoroark being the frontrunner.Remember the post-Brawl/pre-Smash 4 times, when people thought Zoroark was gonna happen?
God I miss those times.
we've seen him in the gameHad Gen 6 not creeped up at the opportune time, I think we would've had something from Gen 5, Zoroark being the frontrunner.
Funny how Zoroark initially failed being the "new Lucario", but has since claimed more time in the spotlight via Hisuian Zoroark, a clear posterboy for Hisui and will likely remain popular in SV too (assuming it will be transferable and viable competitively).