Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
True but my point was that Sakurai has changed his mind on characters before. Like I mentioned before, Smash has already shifted focus from a Nintendo crossover to a celebration of gaming. I don’t get what’s so sacred about the fact that a character originated from a video game other than the fact that Sakurai mentioned he only wanted game characters previously.Villager and Ridley were purely from a gameplay perspective. They’re still video game characters.
no we didn’t, what sakurai said was he’d be a licensing nightmare not that he was almost inWe almost had James Bond in Melee, but of course that didn’t happen, but we definitely could have seen a 4th party character in Brawl or Smash 4 if Sakurai wanted.
And considering I keep forgetting MultiVersus exists, I doubt that'll mean much in the end...And we now have Multiversus as an "Anything Goes" crossover platform fighter.
now now, just cause you forget about something doesn’t mean it won’t be impactfulAnd considering I keep forgetting MultiVersus exists, I doubt that'll mean much in the end...
I mean, Banjo and Steve are owned by Microsoft but nobody is using them as proof that non-video game characters are possible.I think Sora is already proof that it CAN happen, even if he originated from videogames, he's still partially owned by Disney.
Low key think Spongebob or Batman would make better non videogame character choices than Goku would be.As much as I think Goku is a god awful pick even by Non-Video Game Standards, if an Ultimate Deluxe somehow happens, I wouldn’t be shocked if Goku managed to sneak in as DLC as a last surprise, even if there are FAR better picks for Non-Video Game Characters. I mean, James Bond, Spider-Man, Team Rocket. But if any get on it’s probably Goku and I have just accepted it at this point.
so did toad and look how that’s going for himAgain, i repeat without questioning myself: Doraemon made it into a Top 10 for Melee newcomers before it was released.
I think his gadgets give him a lot of potential in the battles.
I feel like the biggest reason we never got Toad as a stand-alone character is because he’s already a part of Peach’s moveset. They even recently included Toad in all of Peach’s throws so I feel like that’s Sakurai’s way of representing him.so did toad and look how that’s going for him
Yeah, like, I had no interest in the likes of Banjo, Steve or Sora, but I can't reasonably argue that they don't deserve to be in Smash.Not wanting a character is not necessarily because of "entitlement". And you can think that a lot of people "deserve to be" or "should be" in Smash without wanting them.
You spelled DuckTales weird.Because Battle for Bikini Bottom and the Arkham series are probably the best licensed games ever made.
like that stopped chromI feel like the biggest reason we never got Toad as a stand-alone character is because he’s already a part of Peach’s moveset. They even recently included Toad in all of Peach’s throws so I feel like that’s Sakurai’s way of representing him.
I try not to concern myself too much with how much a character “deserves” to get in because I feel like that is very subjective. I never use a character’s “deservedness” to argue against their inclusion but I do sometimes bring it up to help justify why I feel some of my favorites would be cool to see.Yeah, like, I had no interest in the likes of Banjo, Steve or Sora, but I can't reasonably argue that they don't deserve to be in Smash.
I think Chrom only happened because he was an easy echo of Roy. Toad would be a completely unique character and require a lot more resources.like that stopped chrom
Seriously, both Scrooge McDuck and Wreck-It Ralph are better choices to represent Disney than Sora.You spelled DuckTales weird.
I don't think it's that non-video game characters "can't" join Smash Bros. But it's more like you have so many video game characters and series not yet in Smash and it feels like a non-video game character joining would just open the non-video game floodgates, making it more harder for video game characters and series that people want that aren't in Smash to make the cut.I thought it was established that no non-video game characters can join Smash period
There’s still hundreds of game series and characters that aren’t pet of Smash yet, even among series and companies already part of Smash.
View attachment 352133
Lowkey, James Bond should be here. Bond not only has GOLDENEYE, but also really good run in gaming as a whole regardless of the impact Goldeneye had in Gaming.Low key think Spongebob or Batman would make better non videogame character choices than Goku would be.
Because Battle for Bikini Bottom and the Arkham series are probably the best licensed games ever made.
Okay, okay i get ya, but counterpoint, Sora is friends with both of these characters, so by havng Sora in the game we by proxy have both of them repped.Seriously, both Scrooge McDuck and Wreck-It Ralph are better choices to represent Disney than Sora.
At least we have Joanna Dark as the gaming equivalent to James Bond. Perfect Dark even kept elements of GoldenEye like some of the stages for multiplayer.Lowkey, James Bond should be here. Bond not only has GOLDENEYE, but also really good run in gaming as a whole regardless of the impact Goldeneye had in Gaming.
Yeah, they seem like a great fit for Nintendo. I’d love to see them work on the DK series again if they’re up for it.It'd be cool if Yooka-Laylee got into Smash to. Honestly, these characters just scream and ooze Nintendo to me. I wish Nintendo could just purchase Playtonic.
yesIt'd be cool if Yooka-Laylee got into Smash to. Honestly, these characters just scream and ooze Nintendo to me. I wish Nintendo could just purchase Playtonic.
With how much inspiration the Impossible Lair took from the Retro DKC games, am pretty sure they would love nothing more.Yeah, they seem like a great fit for Nintendo. I’d love to see them work on the DK series again if they’re up for it.
Speaking of which, what has Playtonic been up to lately? Haven't heard from them in awhile...It'd be cool if Yooka-Laylee got into Smash to. Honestly, these characters just scream and ooze Nintendo to me. I wish Nintendo could just purchase Playtonic.
Street Fighter composer says Fei Long won't appear in the series ever again https://t.co/ogpcvblZOt pic.twitter.com/NVAEwDSJUr
— GoNintendoTweet (@GoNintendoTweet) May 10, 2022
And if it is possible to get the Banjo-Kazooie series from Microsoft.Yeah, they seem like a great fit for Nintendo. I’d love to see them work on the DK series again if they’re up for it.
Oh…I wonder how this will affect Law’s appearances in future Tekken games?Speaking of which, what has Playtonic been up to lately? Haven't heard from them in awhile...
Unrelated, but here's a more unique form of character deconfirmation:
Street Fighter composer says Fei Long won't appear in the series ever again https://t.co/ogpcvblZOt pic.twitter.com/NVAEwDSJUr
— GoNintendoTweet (@GoNintendoTweet) May 10, 2022
TLDR: Bruce Lee's family doesn't want anymore parodies of him, and this is Capcom's way of respecting their wishes.
I’m guessing Rock Lee and Might Guy from Naruto are gone too.Oh…I wonder how this will affect Law’s appearances in future Tekken games?
Oh no, the only good Naruto characters.I’m guessing Rock Lee and Might Guy from Naruto are gone too.
Oh…I wonder how this will affect Law’s appearances in future Tekken games?
Well, FWIW, this particular case seems to be specifically Capcom's response. I don't think we know yet how Bandai Namco or Shonen Jump are gonna respond.I’m guessing Rock Lee and Might Guy from Naruto are gone too.
Yeah, Chrom only happened because he was cloneable. But that's not the point...the point is that even though being a part of Robin's moveset was the best they could do for Chrom in 4, it was not the best they could do for him in Ult and the previous decision to incorporate him into another character did not stop them from making him playable.I think Chrom only happened because he was an easy echo of Roy. Toad would be a completely unique character and require a lot more resources.
That’s true. There’s also Hitmonlee from Pokémon. That will be interesting to see if anything happens there. Hopefully not because it’s one of my favorite Fighting types but they did remove Kadabra from the TCG so we’ll see.Well, FWIW, this particular case seems to be specifically Capcom's response. I don't think we know yet how Bandai Namco or Shonen Jump are gonna respond.
I don’t think being part of Peach’s moveset means that Toad can’t make it in on his own, just that I feel it probably makes him a lower priority in Sakurai’s eyes. If there is a huge demand for him and Toadette for the next game, I’m sure that wouldn’t stop him and Sakurai could just edit Peach so they could both make it in as separate characters.Yeah, Chrom only happened because he was cloneable. But that's not the point...the point is that even though being a part of Robin's moveset was the best they could do for Chrom in 4, it was not the best they could do for him in Ult and the previous decision to incorporate him into another character did not stop them from making him playable.
So, if you apply the logic to Toad, then deciding in a previous game to represent Toad through Peach's moves does not preclude them from making Toad a standalone later on, even if they didn't want to significantly alter Peach at all.
Hopefully that's not too long-winded to follow...
I mean, Chrom does set a precedent. Still, like many others, I'd much prefer Captain Toad over some generic one. I still remember when New Super Mario Bros. Wii was first released, having two rando Toads were NOT popular choices for playables.Yeah, Chrom only happened because he was cloneable. But that's not the point...the point is that even though being a part of Robin's moveset was the best they could do for Chrom in 4, it was not the best they could do for him in Ult and the previous decision to incorporate him into another character did not stop them from making him playable.
So, if you apply the logic to Toad, then deciding in a previous game to represent Toad through Peach's moves does not preclude them from making Toad a standalone later on, even if they didn't want to significantly alter Peach at all.
Hopefully that's not too long-winded to follow...
Yeah, that is something that can be argued, at least. Although Toad could rise in priority, especially now that there aren't a lot of likely Mario reps besides Waluigi.I don’t think being part of Peach’s moveset means that Toad can’t make it in on his own, just that I feel it probably makes him a lower priority in Sakurai’s eyes.
But if we extrapolate from the situation with Chrom, editing Peach wouldn't even be strictly necessary.could just edit Peach
I used to be more a Captain person but now I think the main one is the best choice. He's not any more generic than Yoshi and perhaps other avatar-type characters like Villager.I'd much prefer Captain Toad over some generic one
But do you think that reaction would've been the same if it was just the main red Toad? In any event, I don't think that's entirely relevant to Smash, which already has plenty of playable Mario characters that aren't playable in New SMB Wii; one Toad wouldn't be taking up nearly as much of the PC roster, proportionally speaking.I still remember when New Super Mario Bros. Wii was first released, having two rando Toads were NOT popular choices for playables.