New Magazine Cover

[Shuma]

There are NONE unknown shadows.

 

[M.K]

Someone should ask them if Zelda still changes into Sheik...you know....through E-Mail...

 

[Gomolka]

rofl spandango

 

[DekuBoy]

No I didn't get a preview disc. :-(
The magazine staff got one for their 8 page preview.
I'm very jealous.

 

[Chaosblade77]

Those are the only things that I couldn't figure out. It doesn't look anything new is on the cover.

#2 might just be part of Pit/Diddy

 

[Darkfur]

1 is Squirtle for sure.

One of the other two is probably Ivysaur. And I think the other is Zamus... maybe?

 

[~N9NE~]

Is it worth buying? I haven't bought NOM in ages....and guys I seriously doubt they would put anyone secret on the cover.

 

[M.K]

Ima say:

#1--Squirtle? Ivysaur?
#2- Diddy's Arm.

 

[Shuma]

Atually #2 is Donkey kongs right arm.

1 is squirtle.

 

[Grim Spandango]

You should take pictures of the article. Seriously at least give us a summary of what it says.

 

[Boofer]

I wonder if this cover (or the article) says anything about the starting roster. Probably not though...

 

[raymanbud714]

I... i think i see either jiggily puff or a mew!!! (instead of mewtwo) right... next in between charzard, snake, and kirby theres this head with a set of eyes that look "mew" like. but it could be jiggilypuff WHAT FUN!

 

[Chaosblade77]

I... i think i see either jiggily puff or a mew!!! (instead of mewtwo) right... next in between charzard, snake, and kirby theres this head with a set of eyes that look "mew" like. but it could be jiggilypuff WHAT FUN!

That is what I was thinking (Jigglypuff). It's marked as #1 in my picture I posted and I don't think it look smuch like Ivysaur or Squirtle (probably is Ivysaur though, actually.)

And #3 in not Zamus is it? She is up by Andross

 

[LegendOfGeno]

Info PLEASE! Any additional info in the article?

Pictures of the article would be nice

 

[Drik Khaail]

this is probably photoshop people. looking at the picture, all of the poses I have seen before on the site, nothing new. freaking good photoshop none the less. But what I (and others) want is the article itself! I want my bribe to stay patient!

 

[Soft3x]

There are three peoples behind Charizard, could it be the Elite Beat Agents? ^_^'

 

[Jackal478]

There are three peoples behind Charizard, could it be the Elite Beat Agents? ^_^'

ITS PETEY PIRANHA

 

[Jumpinjahosafa]

What the heck is that bird right in the middle?

Pidgeot? wtf?

Oh nvm.. probably pit.

 

[Mr.Victory07]

this is probably photoshop people. looking at the picture, all of the poses I have seen before on the site, nothing new. freaking good photoshop none the less. But what I (and others) want is the article itself! I want my bribe to stay patient!

Its not a photoshop, its actually on the magazine's website

Is that diddy's arm in between Pit's wings?
And who is that between charizard and snake?

 

[Youko]

Why are we STILL speculating characters on the front page when nothing new will surface?

The real question is: what does the article actually SAY?

 

[Karleko]

1 = Torchic (not Squirtle), you can clearly see the beak.
2 = Donkey Kong's Arm
3 = Zero suit Zamus

There is nothing new on the picture. Everything is cleary see-able.

Edit: Between Charizard and Snake = Popo ( not Nana from Ice Climbers), Kirby, Torchic and Yoshi. It's pretty easy to see, ps: I'm looking on the sites picture (which is bigger and easier to make out.)

 

[FutureBrawlOwner1413]

Above Zamus' head is some kind of creepy smily face with fangs don't know what that is. Down and to the right of that is Ike but he hase something in his hand with many little things floating around it. For some reason though it look's like a 18th century soilder no idea why. To the far left the only reanable amsoumtion is:

 

[Dragothel]

dammit i got so excited that we could get a playable demo for brawl :D

 

[soviet prince]

come on someone post the article already

 

[Rety]

the cover is as meaningless as it gets GIVE US THE ARTICLE...

(I maybe got a bit carried away )

 

[Chaosblade77]

I doubt it will be any different than Nintendo Power's article. Unless they actually claim to have played a FULL copy of the game (which I doubt). It is probably a reference to the showing before E for All where game journalists from major game news sources got to play.

I doubt there is anything new in the article.

 

[Blobulator]

I doubt it will be any different than Nintendo Power's article. Unless they actually claim to have played a FULL copy of the game (which I doubt). It is probably a reference to the showing before E for All where game journalists from major game news sources got to play.

I doubt there is anything new in the article.

Regardless, I'm still certain that the actual article would be more interesting than a photoshopped cover with absolutely NO new characters, despite how badly people want to see a new character on it.

 

[Jumpinjahosafa]

Regardless, I'm still certain that the actual article would be more interesting than a photoshopped cover with absolutely NO new characters, despite how badly people want to see a new character on it.

Its not photoshopped..

 

[Chaosblade77]

Its not photoshopped..

I assume he meant the cover itself was produced in photoshop, but regardless the rest of his point is somewhat valid (although it will probably just be a reword of what gaming sites and other magazines have said about the Brawl demo, which has gotten pretty old since we have a lot more info just from the people who went to E for All).

 

[Blobulator]

Its not photoshopped..

Sorry I didn't mean it as in the cover is a fake. I just meant it as in the guys at the magazine just threw it together from existing images from the DOJO and such. It's not like they had exclusive pictures detailing unrevealed characters they decided to put on the cover, considering all images on there are the official DOJO pictures or lifted from the boxart. They just compiled them all together on the cover for the issue.

Also, yeah, I know it'll probably just be a rehash of info if anything, but it's nice to get a new perspective on things. Never know what might come up

 

[Darkurai]

There's nothing new here. All they did was take the boxart and the images on the DOJO!! and play with photoshop.

 

[Blobulator]

There's nothing new here. All they did was take the boxart and the images on the DOJO!! and play with photoshop.

Exactly my point which is why I'd be more interested in the article at the very least.

 

[HourglassMemory]

Link, Wario, Mario, Peach, Pikachu, Zelda, PK Trainer, Lucas, Samus, Snake, Kirby, Iceclimbers, Charizard, Squirtle? Petey Piranha behind Charizard, Yoshi, Sonic, Diddy Kong, Donkey Kong, Pit, Bowser, Ike, Fox, Zero suit Samus (I can't understand what's above her shadow. It looks like a barrel or something), and obviously, metaknight.

What's next to Ike, and behind ZSS' gun?

I can't see Torchic or anything like that, since it's not a playable character.
They woduln't put an item in the group shot.

And I acutally don't care about this photo. I care about what the article talks about!
Can't anybody scan it or something?

 

[Captain Anthony]

http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/2195/lawlab5xl3.jpg


1. Link
2. Wario
3. Mario
4. Peach
5. Samus
6. Zero Suit Samus
7. Ike
8. Bowser
9. Diddy Kong
10. Donkey Kong
11. Pokemon Trainer
12. Lucas
13. Fox
14. Snake
15. Zelda
16. Pit
17. Sonic
18. Kirby
19. Charizard
20. Yoshi
21. Ice Climbers
22. Petey Piranha
23. Meta Knight

Now, the only thing I can't identify is the circle leaving the trail of what almost looks like bullet shells behind it above Zero Suit Samus. If we're speculating over anything, it's that.

 

[UsernameLink]

1 = Torchic (not Squirtle), you can clearly see the beak.
2 = Donkey Kong's Arm
3 = Zero suit Zamus

There is nothing new on the picture. Everything is cleary see-able.

Edit: Between Charizard and Snake = Popo ( not Nana from Ice Climbers), Kirby, Torchic and Yoshi. It's pretty easy to see, ps: I'm looking on the sites picture (which is bigger and easier to make out.)

ITS SQUITLE! sorry, you have to be blind not to think that its not squirtle. ITS EVEN BLUE! (kirby is pink so dont even say its blue because of the background light)

 

[Chaosblade77]

http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/2195/lawlab5xl3.jpg


1. Link
2. Wario
3. Mario
4. Peach
5. Samus
6. Zero Suit Samus
7. Ike
8. Bowser
9. Diddy Kong
10. Donkey Kong
11. Pokemon Trainer
12. Lucas
13. Fox
14. Snake
15. Zelda
16. Pit
17. Sonic
18. Kirby
19. Charizard
20. Yoshi
21. Ice Climbers
22. Petey Piranha
23. Meta Knight

Now, the only thing I can't identify is the circle leaving the trail of what almost looks like bullet shells behind it above Zero Suit Samus. If we're speculating over anything, it's that.

That is Zero Suit Samus's paralyzer with the Andross AT shooting stuff, and Ike's sword.

Also, beside... 21, you missed what looks like Ivysaur Squirtle. I see it now, definitely Squirtle.

 

[HourglassMemory]

JIGGLYPUFF CONFIRMED

To the left of Snakes head, you can see his eyes and his round figure.

It looks like Piplup, but it doesn't make any sense that they would put a character that is limited to being an item, and make it small and foggy.
But having Andross, it could be possible that they put Piplup there.

Where's Dedede by the way?

 

[Flaming_Wuzzle]

JIGGLYPUFF CONFIRMED

To the left of Snakes head, you can see his eyes and his round figure.

That's Squirtle.

 

[Hydde]

I swear i also see donatello above poke trainer head! :D

 

[Drake3]

It's weird how people prioritize things. They got a demo with all confirmed characters? Do they plan on saying anything about them ooor no?