Sephiroth M
Smash Apprentice
Is this a good match-up for marth or bad?
*barrel rolls*
*barrel rolls*
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You would rather lose? I like the 0-20% kills... And why wouldn't the Falco play to his fullest right from the start?I wouldnt recommend playing gay against a falco he can become gayer even more xDD
M2K vs PC!? Robot vs Mindgame Superpro!? You need to step up dude.Your right, there hasn't been anything worth watching since the Ken v Azen days
I got to the point where I was like "Why am I watching other people play when I could be playing myself..."M2K vs PC!? Robot vs Mindgame Superpro!? You need to step up dude.
I feel like a person would have to intentionally make stupid posts to sound any dumber than what I have seen in your posts thus far. No offense, you just seem to have no basis for the statements you are making.PC would win anyways >.>
By "Unexperienced beginner" you mean new to the forums, correct? I've been playing ssb since before melee was released, and have played as Marth since unlocking him (same day). I just want to make everyone clear on that. (New to the Forums, not to the game.)I love it when unexperienced beginners talk big.
Aye, as have the people who play Smash on my hall at college. I beat them in more 2v1s yesterday. What do they have to show for it? Clearly length of time playing is irrelevant; number of tournaments attended may be a better figure for establishing a player's worth.By "Unexperienced beginner" you mean new to the forums, correct? I've been playing ssb since before melee was released, and have played as Marth since unlocking him (same day). I just want to make everyone clear on that. (New to the Forums, not to the game.)
Please dont get me wrong, im not trying to prove my skill as a player, im just trying to avoid being called "unexperienced" when that is not true. experience directly relates to how long or often you play, while skill is what tells how good you are. Nonetheless, i'd rather not start an argument, as forum arguments never turn out well for anyone, so that is where i stand.Aye, as have the people who play Smash on my hall at college. I beat them in more 2v1s yesterday. What do they have to show for it? Clearly length of time playing is irrelevant; number of tournaments attended may be a better figure for establishing a player's worth.
experience doesn't at all directly relate to how long or often you play it relates to who and how you play. you could have been playing for all these years and not learned an andvanced tactic at all which pretty much gives someone no credibility when they talk about pretty much any aspect of the game since your reasoning and scenario analysis is severely limited to the basic game mechanics. I didn't learn advanced tactics until maybe 3 or so years ago yet technically I had been playing the game since launch as well, quite frequently also. At the time I thought roll dodging was the key to mastering the game, I would hardly have called myself experienced even though technically I had been playing as long as Ken, Azen, or Chillin or whoever was doing well in tournaments at that time.Please dont get me wrong, im not trying to prove my skill as a player, im just trying to avoid being called "unexperienced" when that is not true. experience directly relates to how long or often you play, while skill is what tells how good you are. Nonetheless, i'd rather not start an argument, as forum arguments never turn out well for anyone, so that is where i stand.