• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Marth Removed? - Ike's alt custome?

Okysho

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
792
Location
Currently: lost in the realm of Akanea.
also people, keep in mind that there are supposed to be about 30-35 character spots if certain characters don't get in, you have to tink of who would be much better to take that spot.. and they'd have to be pretty **** good to best Marth, considering that Marth bests ike anyways... muhahahaaa
 

TheMagicalKuja

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 25, 2001
Messages
2,079
Location
I'm not telling you psychos
3DS FC
2020-0988-7919
Most of the heavier speculation sez Ike resembles Sigurd more than Marth.

Despite being a Micaiah fanboy to the point that I made a stupid bet, I see the final roster being Marth and Ike. I'll be surprised if we only see Ike/Micaiah or Ike/Micaiah/Sigurd.
 

Rex+

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
581
Location
Carlsbad, California
*prays to God*
Spare Marth.
There's no reason for Sakurai not to do it. America has already familiarized itself with Fire Emblem's first hero, even more so with a remake of his game that will be released internationally.
I'd have a heart attack if Marth wasn't in the roster.
 

Okysho

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
792
Location
Currently: lost in the realm of Akanea.
"He's the face of Fire Emblem" doesn't sound too good of a reason.
That's not what I said, Marth is now a MARKET icon as in he is a character used to promote his new game in order for it to make sales. It's all business, though the fact that Marth IS the face of Fire Emblem is another good point...

IT's like what happened to Roy ins SSBM he was only thrown in to promote the new Fire Emblem game for GBA that was released shortly after Melee in Japan, though it didn't sell well... that's because... well you'd have to play the game to understand, Marth games however have always made good ratings and sales. Hence the remake, hence the marketability value and promotional value if he were put back in brawl
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Marth is an historical figure for Fire Emblem, Nintendo and the whole Tactic RPG market in general. He isn't only the first FE character, but the character who started the Tactic RPG genre. The first Fire Emblem was very important for Nintendo and the Japanese RPG community and that's why it got 2 remakes already. Fans wanted him in Melee, even at expense of other way more known characters like Metaknight, Dedede, Pit and the like.

The fact that Ike isn't anything like Marth makes him even more likely than before.
 

SirPenguin

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
300
Location
Maine
I'd say Marth wasn't so much liked because of his character (Which, indeed, is just the overplayed 'lol japanese guy with a sword' archetype), but more because he was a pretty high tiered character. If he's replaced, it certainly won't be a great loss. I'm just not entirely convinced Ike is a proper replacement.
 

Okysho

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
792
Location
Currently: lost in the realm of Akanea.
Marth is an historical figure for Fire Emblem, Nintendo and the whole Tactic RPG market in general. He isn't only the first FE character, but the character who started the Tactic RPG genre. The first Fire Emblem was very important for Nintendo and the Japanese RPG community and that's why it got 2 remakes already. Fans wanted him in Melee, even at expense of other way more known characters like Metaknight, Dedede, Pit and the like.

The fact that Ike isn't anything like Marth makes him even more likely than before.
that's a good point.. I forgot about that...

I hate to contradict you however, but the first tactics RPG game was actually Shining Force for Genesis, however it was Fire Emblem 1 and 3 which made the genre so popular and that's why it's the biggest game franchise of it's genre today... pretty much all because of Marth
 

IntelliHeath1

Smash Ace
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
816
This is the dumbest thread based on blind speculation I've ever seen.

OP, learn proper grammar you moron.
Tsk Tsk, Kin3tic. Insulting me would make you look much immature. I wonder why you insulted me, because of my speculation?

I don't think you should insult me in first place since I have poor English because English is my second language. Mind you, please grow up and be mature about other people's English since English may not be their first.

Also, insulting other people's speculation or straightforward insult their English is pretty low of you, and pretty immature, but I will leave it as it is.

Thanks you for your comments but it is not necessary of you being smartaleck with english.
 

NukeA6

Smash Master
Joined
May 17, 2002
Messages
3,103
Why do people want Marth back? I only hear some biased crap to support his inclusion.
He's coming back no matter what you think. You do realize Ike's moves are different from Marth? Where's the Shield Breaker? The Dancing Sword? The Dolphin Slash? The tipper? The speed?
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
that's a good point.. I forgot about that...

I hate to contradict you however, but the first tactics RPG game was actually Shining Force for Genesis, however it was Fire Emblem 1 and 3 which made the genre so popular and that's why it's the biggest game franchise of it's genre today... pretty much all because of Marth
Eh no, Shining Force I was a 1992 game. FE was released in 1990. Also Shining Force copypasted FE's mechanics (grid system, recruits, chapter and map structures, people dead forever) and plot (a Dark Dragon, a Sword of Light, a young and inexpert descendant of a legendary warrior...) badly. The FE remake was a 1993 game and I believe it was a counterattack against those new clones popping around. Shining Force has more credit because SEGA actually worked to bring the series to the US and Europe, while FE remained unknown until Melee.

Maybe you are talking about Shining in the Darkness, which was a 1991 game (after FE) and wasn't even a Tactical RPG but rather one of these first person RPGs like Wizardry.

FE was the first game in its genre, it inspired series like Super Robot Wars, Tactics Ogre, Shining Force, Front Mission... and many of their creators had accepted it in interviews.
 

Okysho

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
792
Location
Currently: lost in the realm of Akanea.
Eh no, Shining Force I was a 1992 game. FE was released in 1990. Also Shining Force copypasted FE's mechanics (grid system, recruits, chapter and map structures, people dead forever) and plot (a Dark Dragon, a Sword of Light, a young and inexpert descendant of a legendary warrior...) badly. The FE remake was a 1993 game and I believe it was a counterattack against those new clones popping around. Shining Force has more credit because SEGA actually worked to bring the series to the US and Europe, while FE remained unknown until Melee.

Maybe you are talking about Shining in the Darkness, which was a 1991 game (after FE) and wasn't even a Tactical RPG but rather one of these first person RPGs like Wizardry.

FE was the first game in its genre, it inspired series like Super Robot Wars, Tactics Ogre, Shining Force, Front Mission... and many of their creators had accepted it in interviews.
lol I musta got false information then, I heard from a friend of mine that Shining Force came first... of course I was too lazy to confirm it... I'm sorry I doubted you and yes you are right about the remake being a counteract to shining force 2. However Fire Emblem's popularity (from a gaming aspect) soared a year later when the anime series was started, however they only made two episodes because of lack of viewers (like I said, huge from a gaming aspect, not worldwide) however, those two episdes did make it over to the americas in the late 90s therefore actually making Marth an international character long before they realize... muhahahaaaa
 

Devotion

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
157
Location
Jackson, NJ
Though this is just my opinion since I really don't feel like repeating all the above reasons why Marth will still be in the game, but to me it looks like and from personal experience that most people who want Marth gone just hate the character and give the same stupid reason that Ike is the new lord who is popular worldwide.
 

SirPenguin

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
300
Location
Maine
QFE. Just because a person has someones costume does not mean they are gone.
Not really, considering Mario has had that costume from Melee (Also SSB64?), so it would make sense to have it. That, and Wario's costume is not his usual, but his WarioWare attire. It doesn't seem fishy that a character from the same series now has his very costume, his IDENTICAL Down + B, and a horribly similar neutral Special? Hmm?
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Not really, considering Mario has had that costume from Melee (Also SSB64?), so it would make sense to have it. That, and Wario's costume is not his usual, but his WarioWare attire. It doesn't seem fishy that a character from the same series now has his very costume, his IDENTICAL Down + B, and a horribly similar neutral Special? Hmm?
The neutral B don't work the same. But how many chargeable moves are in Smash Bros.?

Samus and Mewtwo share one.
Luigi, Pikachu and Pichu too.
Jigglypuff and Sonic.
Marth and Roy.
Link and Young Link.
Sheik can charge needles.
DK can charge his punch.
Diddy can charge the peanut gun.
Dedede can charge the Jet Hammer.
etc, etc.

Many of these moves are very similar among them, just like some characters have identical A moves:

Mario and Falcon can both AAA
Both have a flip kick in the air.
Both kick to the side.
Both use their legs to sweep.

Falcon and Samus share the up tilt, how many characters share the sexy kick? The list is inmense.

Marth and Ike only share the counter, but the rest is awfully different. Is like comparing Pit with Link. Both have arrows and swords, but that's it.
 

vesperview

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
6,347
Location
New Pork City, Colonel Mains: Ness, Luc
Why do people even think Marth is the face of Fire Emblem? Just cause he is the first? So that means Firion is the face of Final Fantasy? All Fire Emblem games change their lead, Marth is not the face of FE, he is probably getting replaced by Ike and getting a second rep which is most likely Micaiah or Black Knight.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Why do people even think Marth is the face of Fire Emblem? Just cause he is the first?
"Just" cause he has appeared in 3 games so far and a lot of FE related media (manga, novels, trading cards, anime, etc.). He's the most popular FE character no matter how you put it. Here and in Japan.
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
He isn't inmune but he isn't out yet as you try to claim. Ike isn't replacing Marth. He is also the most likely FE character by a great margin.
 

Rebel581

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
2,026
Location
College Park, MD
Marth is immune to getting the boot. Marth IS the face of Fire Emblem, period. He was in the first game and the third game. Not to mention, his game is being remade and probably translated. If they weren't putting Marth in Brawl, they wouldn't even bother to remake the old game and bring it to America.

Marth is in. Period. Ike doesn't even have Marth as one of his alt costumes anyways. And the two's movesets are almost completely different. So why does this topic exist?
 

axemangx

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
2,075
Location
Tazmily Village, Currently Maining: Lucas and Didd
Marth is immune to getting the boot. Marth IS the face of Fire Emblem, period. He was in the first game and the third game. Not to mention, his game is being remade and probably translated. If they weren't putting Marth in Brawl, they wouldn't even bother to remake the old game and bring it to America.

Marth is in. Period. Ike doesn't even have Marth as one of his alt costumes anyways. And the two's movesets are almost completely different. So why does this topic exist?
Lucas pretty much screws this over
 

GenG

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,473
Location
Spain
Lucas pretty much screws this over
People is hasting on conclusions. We have yet to see Lucas moves to say if Ness is in or out. I think Lucas' moveset will involve things from MOTHER 3, making him different from Ness (Ropesnake, Saturn Tea Table, the "look at that" tactic...).
 
Top Bottom