Crap-Zapper
Smash Champion
Just been making the round, showing my love for my most wanted newcomers
Hopefully Smash Ultimate is finally the one where K Rool gets in!
(And a Kaptain K Rool alt would be dope)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aa37/3aa37af2f2c998f61ef1508afd60e81e55809807" alt="Diddy Kong"
Anyways,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf892/cf89295a4a1edfbf5d373464a4d65e82e8c77604" alt="Impa4Smash"
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Just been making the round, showing my love for my most wanted newcomers
Hopefully Smash Ultimate is finally the one where K Rool gets in!
(And a Kaptain K Rool alt would be dope)
No way. There's nobody who can drive the hype more than a crazy third party.I can see a scenario where there is no third party newcomer in this game. If they didn't choose to reveal one at E3 then I don't think there's a "big" one up their sleeve.
And who is the crazy third party? There aren't a ton of options left. Sakurai even admitted that after Cloud he sorta ran that well dry.No way. There's nobody who can drive the hype more than a crazy third party.
I wouldn't be so sure. Ridley was definitely meant to drive hype, but he isn't a big deal outside of Nintendo fans. E3 is the one time people who aren't big Nintendo fans pay attention to what Nintendo announces. It would be very stupid to hold onto a third party announcement until a Nintendo direct that only hardcore Nintendo fans will watch. I'm not expecting a third party at this point unless it's a niche one. Although I might be bias because I think there are way too many third party characters already.No way. There's nobody who can drive the hype more than a crazy third party.
Still, Retro or not, I believe there will be a Retro, despite whatever. NOT because it is a "pattern", but because I want more classic, historical Nintendo properties that has not seen the light of day, as someone else we both seem to care a lot for."There HAS to be a third party in Smash!"
"There HAS to be a retro in Smash!"
Fans think about these "rules" more than Sakurai does.
"There HAS to be a NEW playable Pokémon character""There HAS to be a Donkey Kong character in Smash!"
Oh woops, I took it a little too far, didn't I? I'll see myself out.
Not even really comparable. We have seen Sakurai share concern about franchise representation before (moreso in series being overrepresented than anything). I don't believe we've ever seen him state he considers retro and third party additions essential."There HAS to be a Donkey Kong character in Smash!"
Oh woops, I took it a little too far, didn't I? I'll see myself out.
Literally any character you can think of that doesn't belong to Nintendo or an existing series in Smash can be your crazy third party.And who is the crazy third party? There aren't a ton of options left. Sakurai even admitted that after Cloud he sorta ran that well dry.
I haven't read through all the pages of this thread, but I'm pretty sure no one considers that a rule... We definitely would've gotten Dixie or K. Rool a long time ago if there were any rules about DK representation."There HAS to be a Donkey Kong character in Smash!"
Oh woops, I took it a little too far, didn't I? I'll see myself out.
If it's not a rule, then why does absolutely everyone expect a DK character to happen just because?I haven't read through all the pages of this thread, but I'm pretty sure no one considers that a rule... We definitely would've gotten Dixie or K. Rool a long time ago if there were any rules about DK representation.
Then why weren't they at E3? I'm not saying we couldn't get someone like Simon Belmont, but putting Ridley forward was pretty much Nintendo saying "this is our biggest reveal to the world." Pretty much every E3 since 2006 had a third party reveal. Otherwise they would have dropped Sora or something.Literally any character you can think of that doesn't belong to Nintendo or an existing series in Smash can be your crazy third party.
Maybe they just don't want to blow their load from the startThen why weren't they at E3? I'm not saying we couldn't get someone like Simon Belmont, but putting Ridley forward was pretty much Nintendo saying "this is our biggest reveal to the world." Pretty much every E3 since 2006 had a third party reveal. Otherwise they would have dropped Sora or something.
Who is "absolutely everyone?" This is sounding strawman-ish.If it's not a rule, then why does absolutely everyone expect a DK character to happen just because?
They don't always put these things at the forefront. Back at E3 2014 they featured the MIi fighters and Palutena in their direct but also revealed Pac Man a few days later at a very private event. Their big reveals don't necessarily have to be at generalized events or in Nintendo-specialized ones, they can still reveal stuff outside of them.Then why weren't they at E3? I'm not saying we couldn't get someone like Simon Belmont, but putting Ridley forward was pretty much Nintendo saying "this is our biggest reveal to the world." Pretty much every E3 since 2006 had a third party reveal. Otherwise they would have dropped Sora or something.
Because 'Everyone is back' plus Ridley makes it seem like fan service aimed at hardcore Smash fanbase is a particularly big this title compared to previous ones. People have been complaining for quite some time that DK seems to get pretty poor representation despite being one of the more recognizable Nintendo properties. Even Kid Icarus has better representation despite being more niche.If it's not a rule, then why does absolutely everyone expect a DK character to happen just because?
When I say "absolutely everyone", I mean "absolutely everyone in this thread".Who is "absolutely everyone?" This is sounding strawman-ish.
The only reason I can figure people think a DK character is likely because the series has two very popular candidates for a newcomer and lack of Donkey Kong representation in 4 was one of the biggest sticking point for fans - and then the ballot gave them the opportunity to tell Sakurai that directly. Nobody is saying it's one of his "rules."
With Inklings teased. And the current line-up of Nintendo first party All-Stars, the biggest names are already covered. DK has 2, Dixie Kong and King K. Rool, and Metroid had Ridley, which finally happened. Kirby got Bandana Waddle Dee left, and Mario has everyone ...If it's not a rule, then why does absolutely everyone expect a DK character to happen just because?
Everyone in EVERY thread believes this is the time for their characterWhen I say "absolutely everyone", I mean "absolutely everyone in this thread".
and Mario has everyone ...
Would represent every DK fan from Brawl til now.This is the time for a newcomer DK character.
And it ain't KKR.
Cranky for Smash.
Rambi, fam?Would represent every DK fan from Brawl til now.
We always get so Cranky when we don't see K. Rool or Dixie, or ... Rambi.
Wasn't Ness's design also specifically made that way so they could be the same character if you wanted? They left it intentionally ambiguous, so Ness may in fact be Ninten. So in all technicality, Ninten is already in...as his alter ego.View attachment 149802
This is why I don't think Ninten is gonna make it in.
Take Ness, switch his hat to the other direction. You get Ninten.
Ninten's villain is also Giygas.
Mother 2 is practically Mother 1 completely remade.
On the website, when browsing the "By series" catagory, I find it so weird to see Mario, DK, Zelda and Metroid.Something I've thought about, though it doesn't guarantee K. Rool or anyone from DK by any stretch: the ability to sort characters by series on the website is a small accountability measure for how well those series have been treated on the roster. Of the series with multiple characters, it's just DK and Earthbound stuck with two characters, while everyone else has three characters or more. One could be forgiven for thinking they would want at least the appearance of each big series being well-cared for after all the content has been shown.
Not every character has to have a playable, but there are a lot of people, including myself who would LOVE to see Rambi as an Assist Trophy. We got none for crying out loud.Rambi, fam?
This is pretty much the reason why I don't expect any third-party newcomer characters in the base roster in the vein of Sora or Steve from Minecraft.Then why weren't they at E3? I'm not saying we couldn't get someone like Simon Belmont, but putting Ridley forward was pretty much Nintendo saying "this is our biggest reveal to the world." Pretty much every E3 since 2006 had a third party reveal. Otherwise they would have dropped Sora or something.
You can, pal, no stress.sorry to ruin his fun, but lampy's just messing w/ you guys; he said so in the social thread. i hope he didn't get you all too flustered up.
But I'm genuinely curious now @ Crap-Zapper (would tag you but I'm not sure if you like being tagged), why do you think Dixie, KKR and Waddle Dee are All-Stars, but not Toad?
I'm sorry to bring this up as it is relatively unrelated but I've spent the last few days trying to figure out where the background of your profile image came from and only just realised that itsIf it's not a rule, then why does absolutely everyone expect a DK character to happen just because?
I think you may be the first person to have realised that, cheers.I'm sorry to bring this up as it is relatively unrelated but I've spent the last few days trying to figure out where the background of your profile image came from and only just realised that its
Captain America holding back Thanos
I'm so proud of myself.
I feel there are a lot of people stating that there are a lot of people saying he is a shoe-inn, but I haven't come across that many, just a few.I don't think the Mii costume is a guarantee at all.
However, it's clearly a sign that Sakurai knows there's demand for K.Rool.
So instead of seeing the costume as a sign that K.ROOL IS FOR SURE IN!
We need to see it as a foot in the door.
That's still a positive.
But is anyone here actually saying it makes him a lock? All I’ve seen is speculation that he’s on Sakurai’s radar.I don't think the Mii costume is a guarantee at all.
However, it's clearly a sign that Sakurai knows there's demand for K.Rool.
So instead of seeing the costume as a sign that K.ROOL IS FOR SURE IN!
We need to see it as a foot in the door.
That's still a positive.
They're in other threads lol.I feel there are a lot of people stating that there are a lot of people saying he is a shoe-inn, but I haven't come across that many, just a few.
Outside of Inklings, there are no shoe-inn's this time around. Even back before we knew anything, even Spring Man and Rex & Pyra where no shoe-inns. Neither is K. Rool, but as it is the character in question we talk about, we should definently not be overconfident, yet, as we have been let down before, but at the same point, we have never had this much going for us regarding the character. Therefore, I am more confident about his chances than ever before, but as said, no one is near a shoe-inn as the Inklings.
Still, wonder where all of these people are tho.