Matt Silver
Smash Journeyman
How the **** do you know that? You're no better than a common troll.There are 35 chars.
After seeing trophy and sticker pics with no GS things - at all? That just upped Isaac's chances to me, so... Isaac for Brawl!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
How the **** do you know that? You're no better than a common troll.There are 35 chars.
Umm, ya know, about the sukapon thing, there is a kirby sticker too.... ZOMFG n00bzored!!!I'm sorry, Snitch. It looks like Sakurai's on my side.
Yeah. Isaac is lookin' pretty good right about now, don'tcha agree?
(I'm sorry if I'm a little off topic, but other characters' chances pertain to Isaac due to one more series in the Icon theory and such)
Does it matter? The only roster that matters is the one in the game. And if it's the 35 one, so be it. I will still enjoy the game like everybody else. But ****! Wouldn't it be ten times cooler if we would have gotten 5 characters more?...So Isaac being completely unrepresented by anything is evidence for him?
35 characters is the roster. I have it on good faith that all three of my sources' information is not hearsay, it's based on what's actually in the game, what they've seen with their own eyes.
Fun fact: One by one, every non-35 character roster is dropping.
It's tenuous reasoning, we know....So Isaac being completely unrepresented by anything is evidence for him?
Okay, if your sources have seen the roster, what is it? Besides, since 35 has been tossed around so much, it isn't that hard to come to some sort of agreement on the number. It wouldn't surprise me if the roster was 35 regardless. I'm not sure what the roster number has to do with Isaac.35 characters is the roster. I have it on good faith that all three of my sources' information is not hearsay, it's based on what's actually in the game, what they've seen with their own eyes.
I really don't get what you're saying with this.Fun fact: One by one, every non-35 character roster is dropping.
we will. that 35 character bull crap is false. Snitch is just a troll who likes to state nonsense as facts. :DWouldn't it be ten times cooler if we would have gotten 5 characters more?
1. MarkMan mentioned Wolf, Falco, no Ridley, and I recall he mentioned Wind Waker Link, Reno mentioned the rest of the roster, which included ROB in there. sp0rsk confirmed that they were reliable sources and were not basing their info on hearsay.It's tenuous reasoning, we know.
Okay, if your sources have seen the roster, what is it? Besides, since 35 has been tossed around so much, it isn't that hard to come to some sort of agreement on the number. It wouldn't surprise me if the roster was 35 regardless. I'm not sure what the roster number has to do with Isaac.
I really don't get what you're saying with this.
When it proves to be fake within three days, will you mind the wave of flame that will get to you?...So Isaac being completely unrepresented by anything is evidence for him?
35 characters is the roster. I have it on good faith that all three of my sources' information is not hearsay, it's based on what's actually in the game, what they've seen with their own eyes.
Fun fact: One by one, every non-35 character roster is dropping.
yes I do. the simple fact that 35 characters isn't enough too add all the character that the fans want. Sakurai has stated many times that he's making this game for the fans, so he wouldn't remove/leave out popular and deserving characters. it doesn't work that way.And to T-Eagle, hi, I assume you have even one thing that at all hurts the 35 character theory?
Yeah, we won't be the ones to prove you wrong. It'll be Sakurai the one to do so. And it'll be really funny.I don't really have to worry, since it's not fake.
I asked somebody to explain why the 35 roster is wrong. No one has, in the history of the 35 character roster, explained why it's false.
I don't expect any of you to.
no one has explained why it's true either. I've seen WAY more reasons as to why it's false, then I have for it being true... I seriously don't understand how anyone can be stupid enough to believe such a load of crap, that has been PROVEN to make no logical sense. Sakurai already said he's making this game for the fans; so he isn't, I repeat, ISN'T going to just ignore popular and deserving characters. end of story.I asked somebody to explain why the 35 roster is wrong. No one has, in the history of the 35 character roster, explained why it's false.
actually, no. Sakurai has officially stated in multiple interviews (most notably Iwata Asks) that he's making this game for the fans. it's a fact that he doing that. why would he just turn around and remove/leave out popular and deserving characters? thats right he wouldn't! so no; it's NOT an opinion. it's a logical conclusion.Oh my God, that's an opinion! The fact that you think that 35 characters is not good enough is proof that Sakurai thinks that!
and these people are...? I don't see how leaking info on games that have nothing to with with Smash Bros. adds anything to your case. they could be making it up, trying to play off of the respect they have for there other game leaks. I don't believe them. and I have every reason not to.And no, see, you're random. People who have leaked content for video games on multiple occasions are not "random".
no. my retorts are "Sakurai has PROVEN that he's doing this, so he wouldn't do the opposite" which is completely different.Your retorts to me are "I don't think it's good enough, so Sakurai couldn't think it is!"
of course you do. a little something called logic :DI would like a bigger roster but I have no reason to believe there is one.
For one, R.O.B. and how he is already implemented in the game is a reason to doubt it.We really don't have any reasons to doubt it. There's no logical reason why 35 roster is not true - literally no reason.
WHY DO YOU KEEP BRINGING THAT UP.
My God, is there something about what I ****ing said that doesn't give you a hint? Does "they never mentioned ROB" suddenly become "they mentioned ROB"? Do you understand English?
Holy crap.
Fun fact: I'm talking about the ****ing NeoGAF reps,
Could you clarify this for me? MarkMan, Reno, and sp0rsk are the NeoGAF guys, right? You stated that "Reno mentioned... ROB." What do you mean by your above comment, "they never mentioned ROB"?1. MarkMan mentioned Wolf, Falco, no Ridley, and I recall he mentioned Wind Waker Link, Reno mentioned the rest of the roster, which included ROB in there. sp0rsk confirmed that they were reliable sources and were not basing their info on hearsay.