Is brawl not advanced enough to replace melee?

[bboyamir]

Is there a thread discussing, comparing, and contrasting brawl and melee? This might include things like brawl sucks, brawl is too slow compared to melee, because of a lack of fastfalling/lag cancelling techniques brawl will never reach the competitive level of melee, etc. I'm not taking sides i've just heard a lot of this stuff verbally but would like to get some pro opinions on whether they're staying with melee or moving up. There are definitely some advanced techniques that we have yet to discover but, with lcancelling and fastfalling being such integral elements of the "speedy" play of melee, is anybody just pissed off? let me know, i'm new to this site but not to smash.

 

[TwilightSky]

There might be one in the Melee section? Or something like that.

 

[MetaKevin]

There are...tons of them. In fact you might just be able to look at any page of posts anywhere.

 

[Tofu Beast]

****sigh*****

 

[Firestorm88]

At this stage in Brawl's life, it's far more advanced than Melee was at this stage in Melee's life.

 

[Xengri]

There isn't one single organized thread comparing the two (there should be though...Maybe when it gets released for the majority of us).

There is, however many numerous threads about the subject.
Most of them are useless and filled with people saying "Brawl sucks"(despite never actually playing the game) or, "stop wanting Melee 2.0" (despite no one ever mentioning anything close to that).

Most likely, your thread will be infected with these responses soon.

My advice is to just wait until it's at lest released in the US.
Then you might get a more worth while thread.

Oh, and welcome to SWF.

 

[NintendoWarrior]

Yes Brawl is.

 

[Luz]

Please read here

http://smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=121870

and here

http://smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=128574

 

[ptown]

i'm pretty sure it's a universally known fact that pros will not be going to play brawl.

so i think you should quit.