Reznor
work in progress
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 1,821
your thread ended up making a Ridley debate (anti ridley people trying to hard) this thread might go on a whileYou guys, this thread is over. Move to day 3, a special leak addition.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
your thread ended up making a Ridley debate (anti ridley people trying to hard) this thread might go on a whileYou guys, this thread is over. Move to day 3, a special leak addition.
Shokio? Using facts? The only fact he gave was that he's big in his own franchise, nothing else. Using Mario Spin-off titles for Bowser's size is pointless as those are just as non-canon as Smash Bros, he knows nothing about Pikmin, and frankly, the ending just makes him look like an immature bigot.
It's not about Ridley being the size of Samus you dolt, it's about the fact that Ridley's size is never the same, hell, even in between the cutscenes and the boss battle in Brawl Ridley isn't even the same size. The Smash Bros series isn't canon, size has never mattered, so saying it applies because a select character is large doesn't mean anything. Ridley has been shown to fit before, and just because you're butthurt about him being smaller doesn't make it any less possible.
And all I have to do are mention three things and the argument's over...inconsistent size...Smash series isn't canon...and Melee opening. Kay thanks, I think this argument's been dead for a while, it's like beating the bones of the dead horse that's been dead for months on end now...
Hey, it's not my problem I can actually use facts in my argument other than "That's just me". Also, are you really trying to bring looks into this? Yeah, okay, I already ended this argument, and to think stating facts = attacking makes it all the more funnier.lol personal insults? Yeah you're a cool guy. Butt hurt? lol you wish. I just think he looks f*cking ulgy, and i'm sure many would agree, and despite the fact that there are many other issues at hand other than size yall' still gonna act the same. I just have the sense to acknowledge something that doesn't look right rather than cling to my delusions of grandeur. I really hope for your sake this character gets in as a playable character, because they way you guys vehemently attack and insult others for not agreeing to your stances in an argument is ridiculous and laughable. Quit frankly, I don't give a damn who is in this game, so good luck to you.
Hey, it's not my problem I can actually use facts in my argument other than "That's just me". Also, are you really trying to bring looks into this? Yeah, okay, I already ended this argument, and to think stating facts = attacking makes it all the more funnier.
Hey guys, how about we dont argue about all this and just respect each other...
Inconsistent size, Smash isn't canon, Melee opening, argument over. By the way, nice slur, makes you look really (idiotic) intelligent.lol n*gga please, what facts?
s***your thread ended up making a Ridley debate (anti ridley people trying to hard) this thread might go on a while
Inconsistent size, Smash isn't canon, Melee opening, argument over. By the way, nice slur, makes you look really (idiotic) intelligent.
Problem with his arguments are, and I hate to say this, that he doesn't get Ridley's character.If you want to ignore common sense that's on you you wil be enjoying ridley as a boss just like in brawl lol.
The racism was completely unnecessary. It didn't add anything to the post and, believe it or not, "putting a cap" on your vocabulary actually does make you look like you're not a racist idiot.
Ridley could fit. Him not being playable in Brawl doesn't matter. Wario wasn't in Melee, but he should have been.
Rare owns nothing related to DKWrong goody two shoes, i'm not racist. A use of the word doesn't make me racist, and even so that extension of the word refers as a general term, or when used against someone, it refers to someone who is ignorant. Don't call someone racist when you literally know nothing about them.
If not Ridley, Space PIrate for smash 4, or King K Rool. I really don't remember him as much since I beat Donkey Kong Country such a long time ago. Also, aren't the rights to the character with Rare.
Rare owns nothing related to DK
how do some people not know this yet
they didn't include Ridley because they were to lazy (Sakurai said so himself)Though people may not like to hear this, Ridley won't be included in Smash Wii U for the same reasons he was always excluded. However, King K. Rool is not only a very promising concept for a Smash character, he actually has a shot. Personally I'd love KKR as a third DK representative.
Sakurai has said if they tried really hard they could have included him, though that was right after he stated it was impossible, so we're not sure as to what statement we should cling to. Of course his opinion on all things Ridley could have changed like with Villager too. Doesn't seem like it's a matter of principle though.Though people may not like to hear this, Ridley won't be included in Smash Wii U for the same reasons he was always excluded. However, King K. Rool is not only a very promising concept for a Smash character, he actually has a shot. Personally I'd love KKR as a third DK representative.
Rofl Shokio? He has worse points then some people on here...he doesnt even deserve the little bit of credit your giving him. RealTalk.This is a tough one, I love both and I'd enjoy to see both of them in but if the choice had to be made I'd have to go with Ridley. He's one of my favorite characters from that series and represents an element of Metroid I'd like to see in, so I'd choose Ridley.
As for the debate, never use Shokio's video to prove a point. Outside of the issues addressed with it by Wariofan1, it's a mess on its own. He makes petty mistakes that show he doesn't really do his research (yeah, I remember Ridley being in Prime 2), he has a frothing bias in the video that's really apparent and taints his argument and he pushes his video as the end-all-be-all when really he says nothing that adds to the debate and would change anyone's mind on the matter. Really, it's a poorly done video all around.
Thank you, Mr. GrooseTHREAD IS CLOSED
IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE THE ARGUMENT, TAKE IT TO THE RIDLEY OR K. ROOL THREADS.
Thank you, Mr. GrooseTHREAD IS CLOSED
IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE THE ARGUMENT, TAKE IT TO THE RIDLEY OR K. ROOL THREADS.